Cargando…

International benchmarking of specialty hospitals. A series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres

BACKGROUND: Benchmarking is one of the methods used in business that is applied to hospitals to improve the management of their operations. International comparison between hospitals can explain performance differences. As there is a trend towards specialization of hospitals, this study examines the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Lent, Wineke AM, de Beer, Relinde D, van Harten, Wim H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20807408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-253
_version_ 1782187103109513216
author van Lent, Wineke AM
de Beer, Relinde D
van Harten, Wim H
author_facet van Lent, Wineke AM
de Beer, Relinde D
van Harten, Wim H
author_sort van Lent, Wineke AM
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Benchmarking is one of the methods used in business that is applied to hospitals to improve the management of their operations. International comparison between hospitals can explain performance differences. As there is a trend towards specialization of hospitals, this study examines the benchmarking process and the success factors of benchmarking in international specialized cancer centres. METHODS: Three independent international benchmarking studies on operations management in cancer centres were conducted. The first study included three comprehensive cancer centres (CCC), three chemotherapy day units (CDU) were involved in the second study and four radiotherapy departments were included in the final study. Per multiple case study a research protocol was used to structure the benchmarking process. After reviewing the multiple case studies, the resulting description was used to study the research objectives. RESULTS: We adapted and evaluated existing benchmarking processes through formalizing stakeholder involvement and verifying the comparability of the partners. We also devised a framework to structure the indicators to produce a coherent indicator set and better improvement suggestions. Evaluating the feasibility of benchmarking as a tool to improve hospital processes led to mixed results. Case study 1 resulted in general recommendations for the organizations involved. In case study 2, the combination of benchmarking and lean management led in one CDU to a 24% increase in bed utilization and a 12% increase in productivity. Three radiotherapy departments of case study 3, were considering implementing the recommendations. Additionally, success factors, such as a well-defined and small project scope, partner selection based on clear criteria, stakeholder involvement, simple and well-structured indicators, analysis of both the process and its results and, adapt the identified better working methods to the own setting, were found. CONCLUSIONS: The improved benchmarking process and the success factors can produce relevant input to improve the operations management of specialty hospitals.
format Text
id pubmed-2944268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29442682010-09-24 International benchmarking of specialty hospitals. A series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres van Lent, Wineke AM de Beer, Relinde D van Harten, Wim H BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Benchmarking is one of the methods used in business that is applied to hospitals to improve the management of their operations. International comparison between hospitals can explain performance differences. As there is a trend towards specialization of hospitals, this study examines the benchmarking process and the success factors of benchmarking in international specialized cancer centres. METHODS: Three independent international benchmarking studies on operations management in cancer centres were conducted. The first study included three comprehensive cancer centres (CCC), three chemotherapy day units (CDU) were involved in the second study and four radiotherapy departments were included in the final study. Per multiple case study a research protocol was used to structure the benchmarking process. After reviewing the multiple case studies, the resulting description was used to study the research objectives. RESULTS: We adapted and evaluated existing benchmarking processes through formalizing stakeholder involvement and verifying the comparability of the partners. We also devised a framework to structure the indicators to produce a coherent indicator set and better improvement suggestions. Evaluating the feasibility of benchmarking as a tool to improve hospital processes led to mixed results. Case study 1 resulted in general recommendations for the organizations involved. In case study 2, the combination of benchmarking and lean management led in one CDU to a 24% increase in bed utilization and a 12% increase in productivity. Three radiotherapy departments of case study 3, were considering implementing the recommendations. Additionally, success factors, such as a well-defined and small project scope, partner selection based on clear criteria, stakeholder involvement, simple and well-structured indicators, analysis of both the process and its results and, adapt the identified better working methods to the own setting, were found. CONCLUSIONS: The improved benchmarking process and the success factors can produce relevant input to improve the operations management of specialty hospitals. BioMed Central 2010-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2944268/ /pubmed/20807408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-253 Text en Copyright ©2010 van Lent et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Lent, Wineke AM
de Beer, Relinde D
van Harten, Wim H
International benchmarking of specialty hospitals. A series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres
title International benchmarking of specialty hospitals. A series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres
title_full International benchmarking of specialty hospitals. A series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres
title_fullStr International benchmarking of specialty hospitals. A series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres
title_full_unstemmed International benchmarking of specialty hospitals. A series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres
title_short International benchmarking of specialty hospitals. A series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres
title_sort international benchmarking of specialty hospitals. a series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20807408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-253
work_keys_str_mv AT vanlentwinekeam internationalbenchmarkingofspecialtyhospitalsaseriesofcasestudiesoncomprehensivecancercentres
AT debeerrelinded internationalbenchmarkingofspecialtyhospitalsaseriesofcasestudiesoncomprehensivecancercentres
AT vanhartenwimh internationalbenchmarkingofspecialtyhospitalsaseriesofcasestudiesoncomprehensivecancercentres