Cargando…
International benchmarking of specialty hospitals. A series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres
BACKGROUND: Benchmarking is one of the methods used in business that is applied to hospitals to improve the management of their operations. International comparison between hospitals can explain performance differences. As there is a trend towards specialization of hospitals, this study examines the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20807408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-253 |
_version_ | 1782187103109513216 |
---|---|
author | van Lent, Wineke AM de Beer, Relinde D van Harten, Wim H |
author_facet | van Lent, Wineke AM de Beer, Relinde D van Harten, Wim H |
author_sort | van Lent, Wineke AM |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Benchmarking is one of the methods used in business that is applied to hospitals to improve the management of their operations. International comparison between hospitals can explain performance differences. As there is a trend towards specialization of hospitals, this study examines the benchmarking process and the success factors of benchmarking in international specialized cancer centres. METHODS: Three independent international benchmarking studies on operations management in cancer centres were conducted. The first study included three comprehensive cancer centres (CCC), three chemotherapy day units (CDU) were involved in the second study and four radiotherapy departments were included in the final study. Per multiple case study a research protocol was used to structure the benchmarking process. After reviewing the multiple case studies, the resulting description was used to study the research objectives. RESULTS: We adapted and evaluated existing benchmarking processes through formalizing stakeholder involvement and verifying the comparability of the partners. We also devised a framework to structure the indicators to produce a coherent indicator set and better improvement suggestions. Evaluating the feasibility of benchmarking as a tool to improve hospital processes led to mixed results. Case study 1 resulted in general recommendations for the organizations involved. In case study 2, the combination of benchmarking and lean management led in one CDU to a 24% increase in bed utilization and a 12% increase in productivity. Three radiotherapy departments of case study 3, were considering implementing the recommendations. Additionally, success factors, such as a well-defined and small project scope, partner selection based on clear criteria, stakeholder involvement, simple and well-structured indicators, analysis of both the process and its results and, adapt the identified better working methods to the own setting, were found. CONCLUSIONS: The improved benchmarking process and the success factors can produce relevant input to improve the operations management of specialty hospitals. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2944268 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29442682010-09-24 International benchmarking of specialty hospitals. A series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres van Lent, Wineke AM de Beer, Relinde D van Harten, Wim H BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Benchmarking is one of the methods used in business that is applied to hospitals to improve the management of their operations. International comparison between hospitals can explain performance differences. As there is a trend towards specialization of hospitals, this study examines the benchmarking process and the success factors of benchmarking in international specialized cancer centres. METHODS: Three independent international benchmarking studies on operations management in cancer centres were conducted. The first study included three comprehensive cancer centres (CCC), three chemotherapy day units (CDU) were involved in the second study and four radiotherapy departments were included in the final study. Per multiple case study a research protocol was used to structure the benchmarking process. After reviewing the multiple case studies, the resulting description was used to study the research objectives. RESULTS: We adapted and evaluated existing benchmarking processes through formalizing stakeholder involvement and verifying the comparability of the partners. We also devised a framework to structure the indicators to produce a coherent indicator set and better improvement suggestions. Evaluating the feasibility of benchmarking as a tool to improve hospital processes led to mixed results. Case study 1 resulted in general recommendations for the organizations involved. In case study 2, the combination of benchmarking and lean management led in one CDU to a 24% increase in bed utilization and a 12% increase in productivity. Three radiotherapy departments of case study 3, were considering implementing the recommendations. Additionally, success factors, such as a well-defined and small project scope, partner selection based on clear criteria, stakeholder involvement, simple and well-structured indicators, analysis of both the process and its results and, adapt the identified better working methods to the own setting, were found. CONCLUSIONS: The improved benchmarking process and the success factors can produce relevant input to improve the operations management of specialty hospitals. BioMed Central 2010-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC2944268/ /pubmed/20807408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-253 Text en Copyright ©2010 van Lent et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van Lent, Wineke AM de Beer, Relinde D van Harten, Wim H International benchmarking of specialty hospitals. A series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres |
title | International benchmarking of specialty hospitals. A series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres |
title_full | International benchmarking of specialty hospitals. A series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres |
title_fullStr | International benchmarking of specialty hospitals. A series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres |
title_full_unstemmed | International benchmarking of specialty hospitals. A series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres |
title_short | International benchmarking of specialty hospitals. A series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres |
title_sort | international benchmarking of specialty hospitals. a series of case studies on comprehensive cancer centres |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20807408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-253 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanlentwinekeam internationalbenchmarkingofspecialtyhospitalsaseriesofcasestudiesoncomprehensivecancercentres AT debeerrelinded internationalbenchmarkingofspecialtyhospitalsaseriesofcasestudiesoncomprehensivecancercentres AT vanhartenwimh internationalbenchmarkingofspecialtyhospitalsaseriesofcasestudiesoncomprehensivecancercentres |