Cargando…
Prevalence of Chlamydia infection among women visiting a gynaecology outpatient department: evaluation of an in-house PCR assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis
BACKGROUND: Screening women for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in developing countries is highly desirable because of asymptomatic infection. The existing diagnostic methods in developing countries are not effective and their sensitivity fall below 45.0% which leads to further spread of infection....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20822551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-9-24 |
_version_ | 1782187107043770368 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Achchhe L Sachdev, Divya Nagpal, Poonam Chaudhry, Uma Sonkar, Subash C Mendiratta, Suman L Saluja, Daman |
author_facet | Patel, Achchhe L Sachdev, Divya Nagpal, Poonam Chaudhry, Uma Sonkar, Subash C Mendiratta, Suman L Saluja, Daman |
author_sort | Patel, Achchhe L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Screening women for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in developing countries is highly desirable because of asymptomatic infection. The existing diagnostic methods in developing countries are not effective and their sensitivity fall below 45.0% which leads to further spread of infection. There is an urgent need for improved and cost effective diagnostic tests that will reduce the burden of sexually transmitted infections in the developing world. METHODS: Prevalence of C. trachomatis infection among women visiting gynaecology department of Hindu Rao hospital in Delhi, India was determined using Roche Amplicor Multi Well Plate kit (MWP) as well as using in-house PCR assay. We used 593 endocervical swabs for clinical evaluation of the in-house developed assay against Direct Fluorescence Assay (DFA; Group I n = 274) and Roche Amplicor MWP kit (Group II, n = 319 samples) and determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) of the in-house developed assay. RESULTS: We detected 23.0% positive cases and there was a higher representation of women aged 18-33 in this group. An in-house PCR assay was developed and evaluated by targeting unique sequence within the gyrA gene of C. trachomatis. Specificity of the reaction was confirmed by using genomic DNA of human and other STI related microorganisms as template. Assay is highly sensitive and can detect as low as 10 fg of C. trachomatis DNA. The resolved sensitivity of in-house PCR was 94.5% compared with 88.0% of DFA assay. The high specificity (98.4%) and sensitivity (97.1%) of the in-house assay against Roche kit and availability of test results within 3 hours allowed for immediate treatment and reduced the risk of potential onward transmission. CONCLUSIONS: The in-house PCR method is cost effective (~ 20.0% of Roche assay) and hence could be a better alternative for routine diagnosis of genital infection by C. trachomatis to facilitate improved screening and treatment management. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2944303 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29443032010-09-24 Prevalence of Chlamydia infection among women visiting a gynaecology outpatient department: evaluation of an in-house PCR assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis Patel, Achchhe L Sachdev, Divya Nagpal, Poonam Chaudhry, Uma Sonkar, Subash C Mendiratta, Suman L Saluja, Daman Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob Research BACKGROUND: Screening women for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in developing countries is highly desirable because of asymptomatic infection. The existing diagnostic methods in developing countries are not effective and their sensitivity fall below 45.0% which leads to further spread of infection. There is an urgent need for improved and cost effective diagnostic tests that will reduce the burden of sexually transmitted infections in the developing world. METHODS: Prevalence of C. trachomatis infection among women visiting gynaecology department of Hindu Rao hospital in Delhi, India was determined using Roche Amplicor Multi Well Plate kit (MWP) as well as using in-house PCR assay. We used 593 endocervical swabs for clinical evaluation of the in-house developed assay against Direct Fluorescence Assay (DFA; Group I n = 274) and Roche Amplicor MWP kit (Group II, n = 319 samples) and determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) of the in-house developed assay. RESULTS: We detected 23.0% positive cases and there was a higher representation of women aged 18-33 in this group. An in-house PCR assay was developed and evaluated by targeting unique sequence within the gyrA gene of C. trachomatis. Specificity of the reaction was confirmed by using genomic DNA of human and other STI related microorganisms as template. Assay is highly sensitive and can detect as low as 10 fg of C. trachomatis DNA. The resolved sensitivity of in-house PCR was 94.5% compared with 88.0% of DFA assay. The high specificity (98.4%) and sensitivity (97.1%) of the in-house assay against Roche kit and availability of test results within 3 hours allowed for immediate treatment and reduced the risk of potential onward transmission. CONCLUSIONS: The in-house PCR method is cost effective (~ 20.0% of Roche assay) and hence could be a better alternative for routine diagnosis of genital infection by C. trachomatis to facilitate improved screening and treatment management. BioMed Central 2010-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2944303/ /pubmed/20822551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-9-24 Text en Copyright ©2010 Patel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Patel, Achchhe L Sachdev, Divya Nagpal, Poonam Chaudhry, Uma Sonkar, Subash C Mendiratta, Suman L Saluja, Daman Prevalence of Chlamydia infection among women visiting a gynaecology outpatient department: evaluation of an in-house PCR assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis |
title | Prevalence of Chlamydia infection among women visiting a gynaecology outpatient department: evaluation of an in-house PCR assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis |
title_full | Prevalence of Chlamydia infection among women visiting a gynaecology outpatient department: evaluation of an in-house PCR assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of Chlamydia infection among women visiting a gynaecology outpatient department: evaluation of an in-house PCR assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of Chlamydia infection among women visiting a gynaecology outpatient department: evaluation of an in-house PCR assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis |
title_short | Prevalence of Chlamydia infection among women visiting a gynaecology outpatient department: evaluation of an in-house PCR assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis |
title_sort | prevalence of chlamydia infection among women visiting a gynaecology outpatient department: evaluation of an in-house pcr assay for detection of chlamydia trachomatis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20822551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-9-24 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelachchhel prevalenceofchlamydiainfectionamongwomenvisitingagynaecologyoutpatientdepartmentevaluationofaninhousepcrassayfordetectionofchlamydiatrachomatis AT sachdevdivya prevalenceofchlamydiainfectionamongwomenvisitingagynaecologyoutpatientdepartmentevaluationofaninhousepcrassayfordetectionofchlamydiatrachomatis AT nagpalpoonam prevalenceofchlamydiainfectionamongwomenvisitingagynaecologyoutpatientdepartmentevaluationofaninhousepcrassayfordetectionofchlamydiatrachomatis AT chaudhryuma prevalenceofchlamydiainfectionamongwomenvisitingagynaecologyoutpatientdepartmentevaluationofaninhousepcrassayfordetectionofchlamydiatrachomatis AT sonkarsubashc prevalenceofchlamydiainfectionamongwomenvisitingagynaecologyoutpatientdepartmentevaluationofaninhousepcrassayfordetectionofchlamydiatrachomatis AT mendirattasumanl prevalenceofchlamydiainfectionamongwomenvisitingagynaecologyoutpatientdepartmentevaluationofaninhousepcrassayfordetectionofchlamydiatrachomatis AT salujadaman prevalenceofchlamydiainfectionamongwomenvisitingagynaecologyoutpatientdepartmentevaluationofaninhousepcrassayfordetectionofchlamydiatrachomatis |