Cargando…

Sequential introduction of single room isolation and hand hygiene campaign in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit

BACKGROUND: After renovation of the adult intensive care unit (ICU) with installation of ten single rooms, an enhanced infection control program was conducted to control the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in our hospital. METHODS: Since the ICU renovation, all patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Vincent CC, Tai, Josepha WM, Chan, WM, Lau, Eric HY, Chan, Jasper FW, To, Kelvin KW, Li, Iris WS, Ho, PL, Yuen, KY
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20822509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-263
_version_ 1782187114738221056
author Cheng, Vincent CC
Tai, Josepha WM
Chan, WM
Lau, Eric HY
Chan, Jasper FW
To, Kelvin KW
Li, Iris WS
Ho, PL
Yuen, KY
author_facet Cheng, Vincent CC
Tai, Josepha WM
Chan, WM
Lau, Eric HY
Chan, Jasper FW
To, Kelvin KW
Li, Iris WS
Ho, PL
Yuen, KY
author_sort Cheng, Vincent CC
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: After renovation of the adult intensive care unit (ICU) with installation of ten single rooms, an enhanced infection control program was conducted to control the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in our hospital. METHODS: Since the ICU renovation, all patients colonized or infected with MRSA were nursed in single rooms with contact precautions. The incidence of MRSA infection in the ICU was monitored during 3 different phases: the baseline period (phase 1); after ICU renovation (phase 2) and after implementation of a hand hygiene campaign with alcohol-based hand rub (phase 3). Patients infected with extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species were chosen as controls because they were managed in open cubicles with standard precautions. RESULTS: Without a major change in bed occupancy rate, nursing workforce, or the protocol of environmental cleansing throughout the study period, a stepwise reduction in ICU onset nonbacteraemic MRSA infection was observed: from 3.54 (phase 1) to 2.26 (phase 2, p = 0.042) and 1.02 (phase 3, p = 0.006) per 1000-patient-days. ICU onset bacteraemic MRSA infection was significantly reduced from 1.94 (phase 1) to 0.9 (phase 2, p = 0.005) and 0.28 (phase 3, p = 0.021) per 1000-patient-days. Infection due to ESBL-producing organisms did not show a corresponding reduction. The usage density of broad-spectrum antibiotics and fluoroquinolones increased from phase 1 to 3. However a significant trend improvement of ICU onset MRSA infection by segmented regression analysis can only be demonstrated when comparison was made before and after the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic. This suggests that the deaths of fellow healthcare workers from an occupational acquired infection had an overwhelming effect on their compliance with infection control measures. CONCLUSION: Provision of single room isolation facilities and promotion of hand hygiene practice are important. However compliance with infection control measures relies largely on a personal commitment, which may increase when personal safety is threatened.
format Text
id pubmed-2944349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29443492010-09-24 Sequential introduction of single room isolation and hand hygiene campaign in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit Cheng, Vincent CC Tai, Josepha WM Chan, WM Lau, Eric HY Chan, Jasper FW To, Kelvin KW Li, Iris WS Ho, PL Yuen, KY BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: After renovation of the adult intensive care unit (ICU) with installation of ten single rooms, an enhanced infection control program was conducted to control the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in our hospital. METHODS: Since the ICU renovation, all patients colonized or infected with MRSA were nursed in single rooms with contact precautions. The incidence of MRSA infection in the ICU was monitored during 3 different phases: the baseline period (phase 1); after ICU renovation (phase 2) and after implementation of a hand hygiene campaign with alcohol-based hand rub (phase 3). Patients infected with extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species were chosen as controls because they were managed in open cubicles with standard precautions. RESULTS: Without a major change in bed occupancy rate, nursing workforce, or the protocol of environmental cleansing throughout the study period, a stepwise reduction in ICU onset nonbacteraemic MRSA infection was observed: from 3.54 (phase 1) to 2.26 (phase 2, p = 0.042) and 1.02 (phase 3, p = 0.006) per 1000-patient-days. ICU onset bacteraemic MRSA infection was significantly reduced from 1.94 (phase 1) to 0.9 (phase 2, p = 0.005) and 0.28 (phase 3, p = 0.021) per 1000-patient-days. Infection due to ESBL-producing organisms did not show a corresponding reduction. The usage density of broad-spectrum antibiotics and fluoroquinolones increased from phase 1 to 3. However a significant trend improvement of ICU onset MRSA infection by segmented regression analysis can only be demonstrated when comparison was made before and after the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic. This suggests that the deaths of fellow healthcare workers from an occupational acquired infection had an overwhelming effect on their compliance with infection control measures. CONCLUSION: Provision of single room isolation facilities and promotion of hand hygiene practice are important. However compliance with infection control measures relies largely on a personal commitment, which may increase when personal safety is threatened. BioMed Central 2010-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2944349/ /pubmed/20822509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-263 Text en Copyright ©2010 Cheng et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cheng, Vincent CC
Tai, Josepha WM
Chan, WM
Lau, Eric HY
Chan, Jasper FW
To, Kelvin KW
Li, Iris WS
Ho, PL
Yuen, KY
Sequential introduction of single room isolation and hand hygiene campaign in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit
title Sequential introduction of single room isolation and hand hygiene campaign in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit
title_full Sequential introduction of single room isolation and hand hygiene campaign in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit
title_fullStr Sequential introduction of single room isolation and hand hygiene campaign in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit
title_full_unstemmed Sequential introduction of single room isolation and hand hygiene campaign in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit
title_short Sequential introduction of single room isolation and hand hygiene campaign in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit
title_sort sequential introduction of single room isolation and hand hygiene campaign in the control of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20822509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-263
work_keys_str_mv AT chengvincentcc sequentialintroductionofsingleroomisolationandhandhygienecampaigninthecontrolofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinintensivecareunit
AT taijosephawm sequentialintroductionofsingleroomisolationandhandhygienecampaigninthecontrolofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinintensivecareunit
AT chanwm sequentialintroductionofsingleroomisolationandhandhygienecampaigninthecontrolofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinintensivecareunit
AT lauerichy sequentialintroductionofsingleroomisolationandhandhygienecampaigninthecontrolofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinintensivecareunit
AT chanjasperfw sequentialintroductionofsingleroomisolationandhandhygienecampaigninthecontrolofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinintensivecareunit
AT tokelvinkw sequentialintroductionofsingleroomisolationandhandhygienecampaigninthecontrolofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinintensivecareunit
AT liirisws sequentialintroductionofsingleroomisolationandhandhygienecampaigninthecontrolofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinintensivecareunit
AT hopl sequentialintroductionofsingleroomisolationandhandhygienecampaigninthecontrolofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinintensivecareunit
AT yuenky sequentialintroductionofsingleroomisolationandhandhygienecampaigninthecontrolofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinintensivecareunit