Cargando…
Sequential introduction of single room isolation and hand hygiene campaign in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit
BACKGROUND: After renovation of the adult intensive care unit (ICU) with installation of ten single rooms, an enhanced infection control program was conducted to control the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in our hospital. METHODS: Since the ICU renovation, all patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20822509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-263 |
_version_ | 1782187114738221056 |
---|---|
author | Cheng, Vincent CC Tai, Josepha WM Chan, WM Lau, Eric HY Chan, Jasper FW To, Kelvin KW Li, Iris WS Ho, PL Yuen, KY |
author_facet | Cheng, Vincent CC Tai, Josepha WM Chan, WM Lau, Eric HY Chan, Jasper FW To, Kelvin KW Li, Iris WS Ho, PL Yuen, KY |
author_sort | Cheng, Vincent CC |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: After renovation of the adult intensive care unit (ICU) with installation of ten single rooms, an enhanced infection control program was conducted to control the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in our hospital. METHODS: Since the ICU renovation, all patients colonized or infected with MRSA were nursed in single rooms with contact precautions. The incidence of MRSA infection in the ICU was monitored during 3 different phases: the baseline period (phase 1); after ICU renovation (phase 2) and after implementation of a hand hygiene campaign with alcohol-based hand rub (phase 3). Patients infected with extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species were chosen as controls because they were managed in open cubicles with standard precautions. RESULTS: Without a major change in bed occupancy rate, nursing workforce, or the protocol of environmental cleansing throughout the study period, a stepwise reduction in ICU onset nonbacteraemic MRSA infection was observed: from 3.54 (phase 1) to 2.26 (phase 2, p = 0.042) and 1.02 (phase 3, p = 0.006) per 1000-patient-days. ICU onset bacteraemic MRSA infection was significantly reduced from 1.94 (phase 1) to 0.9 (phase 2, p = 0.005) and 0.28 (phase 3, p = 0.021) per 1000-patient-days. Infection due to ESBL-producing organisms did not show a corresponding reduction. The usage density of broad-spectrum antibiotics and fluoroquinolones increased from phase 1 to 3. However a significant trend improvement of ICU onset MRSA infection by segmented regression analysis can only be demonstrated when comparison was made before and after the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic. This suggests that the deaths of fellow healthcare workers from an occupational acquired infection had an overwhelming effect on their compliance with infection control measures. CONCLUSION: Provision of single room isolation facilities and promotion of hand hygiene practice are important. However compliance with infection control measures relies largely on a personal commitment, which may increase when personal safety is threatened. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2944349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29443492010-09-24 Sequential introduction of single room isolation and hand hygiene campaign in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit Cheng, Vincent CC Tai, Josepha WM Chan, WM Lau, Eric HY Chan, Jasper FW To, Kelvin KW Li, Iris WS Ho, PL Yuen, KY BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: After renovation of the adult intensive care unit (ICU) with installation of ten single rooms, an enhanced infection control program was conducted to control the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in our hospital. METHODS: Since the ICU renovation, all patients colonized or infected with MRSA were nursed in single rooms with contact precautions. The incidence of MRSA infection in the ICU was monitored during 3 different phases: the baseline period (phase 1); after ICU renovation (phase 2) and after implementation of a hand hygiene campaign with alcohol-based hand rub (phase 3). Patients infected with extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species were chosen as controls because they were managed in open cubicles with standard precautions. RESULTS: Without a major change in bed occupancy rate, nursing workforce, or the protocol of environmental cleansing throughout the study period, a stepwise reduction in ICU onset nonbacteraemic MRSA infection was observed: from 3.54 (phase 1) to 2.26 (phase 2, p = 0.042) and 1.02 (phase 3, p = 0.006) per 1000-patient-days. ICU onset bacteraemic MRSA infection was significantly reduced from 1.94 (phase 1) to 0.9 (phase 2, p = 0.005) and 0.28 (phase 3, p = 0.021) per 1000-patient-days. Infection due to ESBL-producing organisms did not show a corresponding reduction. The usage density of broad-spectrum antibiotics and fluoroquinolones increased from phase 1 to 3. However a significant trend improvement of ICU onset MRSA infection by segmented regression analysis can only be demonstrated when comparison was made before and after the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic. This suggests that the deaths of fellow healthcare workers from an occupational acquired infection had an overwhelming effect on their compliance with infection control measures. CONCLUSION: Provision of single room isolation facilities and promotion of hand hygiene practice are important. However compliance with infection control measures relies largely on a personal commitment, which may increase when personal safety is threatened. BioMed Central 2010-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2944349/ /pubmed/20822509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-263 Text en Copyright ©2010 Cheng et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cheng, Vincent CC Tai, Josepha WM Chan, WM Lau, Eric HY Chan, Jasper FW To, Kelvin KW Li, Iris WS Ho, PL Yuen, KY Sequential introduction of single room isolation and hand hygiene campaign in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit |
title | Sequential introduction of single room isolation and hand hygiene campaign in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit |
title_full | Sequential introduction of single room isolation and hand hygiene campaign in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit |
title_fullStr | Sequential introduction of single room isolation and hand hygiene campaign in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit |
title_full_unstemmed | Sequential introduction of single room isolation and hand hygiene campaign in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit |
title_short | Sequential introduction of single room isolation and hand hygiene campaign in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit |
title_sort | sequential introduction of single room isolation and hand hygiene campaign in the control of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20822509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-10-263 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chengvincentcc sequentialintroductionofsingleroomisolationandhandhygienecampaigninthecontrolofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinintensivecareunit AT taijosephawm sequentialintroductionofsingleroomisolationandhandhygienecampaigninthecontrolofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinintensivecareunit AT chanwm sequentialintroductionofsingleroomisolationandhandhygienecampaigninthecontrolofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinintensivecareunit AT lauerichy sequentialintroductionofsingleroomisolationandhandhygienecampaigninthecontrolofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinintensivecareunit AT chanjasperfw sequentialintroductionofsingleroomisolationandhandhygienecampaigninthecontrolofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinintensivecareunit AT tokelvinkw sequentialintroductionofsingleroomisolationandhandhygienecampaigninthecontrolofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinintensivecareunit AT liirisws sequentialintroductionofsingleroomisolationandhandhygienecampaigninthecontrolofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinintensivecareunit AT hopl sequentialintroductionofsingleroomisolationandhandhygienecampaigninthecontrolofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinintensivecareunit AT yuenky sequentialintroductionofsingleroomisolationandhandhygienecampaigninthecontrolofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusinintensivecareunit |