Cargando…
Biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments
BACKGROUND: The objective was to determine the age-dependent compressive and tensile properties of female and male thoracic spine segments using postmortem human subjects (PMHS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight thoracic disc segments at T4-5, T6-7, T8-9, and T10-11 levels from 12 PMHS T3-T11 spin...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20890410 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.65477 |
_version_ | 1782187142048382976 |
---|---|
author | Stemper, Brian D. Board, Derek Yoganandan, Narayan Wolfla, Christopher E. |
author_facet | Stemper, Brian D. Board, Derek Yoganandan, Narayan Wolfla, Christopher E. |
author_sort | Stemper, Brian D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The objective was to determine the age-dependent compressive and tensile properties of female and male thoracic spine segments using postmortem human subjects (PMHS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight thoracic disc segments at T4-5, T6-7, T8-9, and T10-11 levels from 12 PMHS T3-T11 spinal columns were divided into groups A and B based on specimen age and loaded in compression and tension. Stiffness and elastic modulus were computed. Stiffness was defined as the slope in the linear region of the force—displacement response. Elastic modulus was defined as the slope of the stress strain curve. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to determine significant differences (P<0.05) in the disc cross-sectional area, stiffness, and elastic modulus based on gender, spinal level, and group. RESULTS: Specimen ages in group A (28 ± 8 years) were significantly lower than in group B (70 ± 7 years). Male discs had significantly greater area (7.2 ± 2.0 sq cm) than female discs (5.9 ± 1.8 sq cm). Tensile and compressive stiffness values were significantly different between the two age groups, but not between gender and level. Specimens in group A had greater tensile (486 ± 108 N/mm) and compressive (3300 ± 642 N/mm) stiffness values compared to group B specimens (tension: 397 ± 124 N/mm, compression: 2527 ± 734 N/mm). Tensile and compressive elastic modulus values depended upon age group and gender, but not on level. Group A specimens had significantly greater tensile and compressive moduli (2.9 ± 0.8 MPa, 19.5 ± 4.1 MPa) than group B specimens (1.7 ± 0.6 MPa, 10.6 ± 3.4 MPa). Female specimens showed significantly greater tensile and compressive moduli (2.6 ± 1.0 MPa, 16.6 ± 6.4 MPa) than male specimens (2.0 ± 0.7 MPa, 13.7 ± 5.0 MPa). DISCUSSION: Using the two groups to represent "young" and "old" specimens, this study showed that the mechanical response decreases in older specimens, and the decrease is greater in compressive than distractive properties. While the decrease is expected, the relative change between the two modes of loading has not been reported. Another conclusion from the study is that the mechanical properties depend on gender, although not as decisive due to sample size. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2944859 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29448592010-09-24 Biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments Stemper, Brian D. Board, Derek Yoganandan, Narayan Wolfla, Christopher E. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article BACKGROUND: The objective was to determine the age-dependent compressive and tensile properties of female and male thoracic spine segments using postmortem human subjects (PMHS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight thoracic disc segments at T4-5, T6-7, T8-9, and T10-11 levels from 12 PMHS T3-T11 spinal columns were divided into groups A and B based on specimen age and loaded in compression and tension. Stiffness and elastic modulus were computed. Stiffness was defined as the slope in the linear region of the force—displacement response. Elastic modulus was defined as the slope of the stress strain curve. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to determine significant differences (P<0.05) in the disc cross-sectional area, stiffness, and elastic modulus based on gender, spinal level, and group. RESULTS: Specimen ages in group A (28 ± 8 years) were significantly lower than in group B (70 ± 7 years). Male discs had significantly greater area (7.2 ± 2.0 sq cm) than female discs (5.9 ± 1.8 sq cm). Tensile and compressive stiffness values were significantly different between the two age groups, but not between gender and level. Specimens in group A had greater tensile (486 ± 108 N/mm) and compressive (3300 ± 642 N/mm) stiffness values compared to group B specimens (tension: 397 ± 124 N/mm, compression: 2527 ± 734 N/mm). Tensile and compressive elastic modulus values depended upon age group and gender, but not on level. Group A specimens had significantly greater tensile and compressive moduli (2.9 ± 0.8 MPa, 19.5 ± 4.1 MPa) than group B specimens (1.7 ± 0.6 MPa, 10.6 ± 3.4 MPa). Female specimens showed significantly greater tensile and compressive moduli (2.6 ± 1.0 MPa, 16.6 ± 6.4 MPa) than male specimens (2.0 ± 0.7 MPa, 13.7 ± 5.0 MPa). DISCUSSION: Using the two groups to represent "young" and "old" specimens, this study showed that the mechanical response decreases in older specimens, and the decrease is greater in compressive than distractive properties. While the decrease is expected, the relative change between the two modes of loading has not been reported. Another conclusion from the study is that the mechanical properties depend on gender, although not as decisive due to sample size. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2944859/ /pubmed/20890410 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.65477 Text en © Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Stemper, Brian D. Board, Derek Yoganandan, Narayan Wolfla, Christopher E. Biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments |
title | Biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments |
title_full | Biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments |
title_short | Biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments |
title_sort | biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20890410 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.65477 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stemperbriand biomechanicalpropertiesofhumanthoracicspinediscsegments AT boardderek biomechanicalpropertiesofhumanthoracicspinediscsegments AT yoganandannarayan biomechanicalpropertiesofhumanthoracicspinediscsegments AT wolflachristophere biomechanicalpropertiesofhumanthoracicspinediscsegments |