Cargando…

Biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments

BACKGROUND: The objective was to determine the age-dependent compressive and tensile properties of female and male thoracic spine segments using postmortem human subjects (PMHS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight thoracic disc segments at T4-5, T6-7, T8-9, and T10-11 levels from 12 PMHS T3-T11 spin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stemper, Brian D., Board, Derek, Yoganandan, Narayan, Wolfla, Christopher E.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20890410
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.65477
_version_ 1782187142048382976
author Stemper, Brian D.
Board, Derek
Yoganandan, Narayan
Wolfla, Christopher E.
author_facet Stemper, Brian D.
Board, Derek
Yoganandan, Narayan
Wolfla, Christopher E.
author_sort Stemper, Brian D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective was to determine the age-dependent compressive and tensile properties of female and male thoracic spine segments using postmortem human subjects (PMHS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight thoracic disc segments at T4-5, T6-7, T8-9, and T10-11 levels from 12 PMHS T3-T11 spinal columns were divided into groups A and B based on specimen age and loaded in compression and tension. Stiffness and elastic modulus were computed. Stiffness was defined as the slope in the linear region of the force—displacement response. Elastic modulus was defined as the slope of the stress strain curve. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to determine significant differences (P<0.05) in the disc cross-sectional area, stiffness, and elastic modulus based on gender, spinal level, and group. RESULTS: Specimen ages in group A (28 ± 8 years) were significantly lower than in group B (70 ± 7 years). Male discs had significantly greater area (7.2 ± 2.0 sq cm) than female discs (5.9 ± 1.8 sq cm). Tensile and compressive stiffness values were significantly different between the two age groups, but not between gender and level. Specimens in group A had greater tensile (486 ± 108 N/mm) and compressive (3300 ± 642 N/mm) stiffness values compared to group B specimens (tension: 397 ± 124 N/mm, compression: 2527 ± 734 N/mm). Tensile and compressive elastic modulus values depended upon age group and gender, but not on level. Group A specimens had significantly greater tensile and compressive moduli (2.9 ± 0.8 MPa, 19.5 ± 4.1 MPa) than group B specimens (1.7 ± 0.6 MPa, 10.6 ± 3.4 MPa). Female specimens showed significantly greater tensile and compressive moduli (2.6 ± 1.0 MPa, 16.6 ± 6.4 MPa) than male specimens (2.0 ± 0.7 MPa, 13.7 ± 5.0 MPa). DISCUSSION: Using the two groups to represent "young" and "old" specimens, this study showed that the mechanical response decreases in older specimens, and the decrease is greater in compressive than distractive properties. While the decrease is expected, the relative change between the two modes of loading has not been reported. Another conclusion from the study is that the mechanical properties depend on gender, although not as decisive due to sample size.
format Text
id pubmed-2944859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29448592010-09-24 Biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments Stemper, Brian D. Board, Derek Yoganandan, Narayan Wolfla, Christopher E. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article BACKGROUND: The objective was to determine the age-dependent compressive and tensile properties of female and male thoracic spine segments using postmortem human subjects (PMHS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight thoracic disc segments at T4-5, T6-7, T8-9, and T10-11 levels from 12 PMHS T3-T11 spinal columns were divided into groups A and B based on specimen age and loaded in compression and tension. Stiffness and elastic modulus were computed. Stiffness was defined as the slope in the linear region of the force—displacement response. Elastic modulus was defined as the slope of the stress strain curve. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to determine significant differences (P<0.05) in the disc cross-sectional area, stiffness, and elastic modulus based on gender, spinal level, and group. RESULTS: Specimen ages in group A (28 ± 8 years) were significantly lower than in group B (70 ± 7 years). Male discs had significantly greater area (7.2 ± 2.0 sq cm) than female discs (5.9 ± 1.8 sq cm). Tensile and compressive stiffness values were significantly different between the two age groups, but not between gender and level. Specimens in group A had greater tensile (486 ± 108 N/mm) and compressive (3300 ± 642 N/mm) stiffness values compared to group B specimens (tension: 397 ± 124 N/mm, compression: 2527 ± 734 N/mm). Tensile and compressive elastic modulus values depended upon age group and gender, but not on level. Group A specimens had significantly greater tensile and compressive moduli (2.9 ± 0.8 MPa, 19.5 ± 4.1 MPa) than group B specimens (1.7 ± 0.6 MPa, 10.6 ± 3.4 MPa). Female specimens showed significantly greater tensile and compressive moduli (2.6 ± 1.0 MPa, 16.6 ± 6.4 MPa) than male specimens (2.0 ± 0.7 MPa, 13.7 ± 5.0 MPa). DISCUSSION: Using the two groups to represent "young" and "old" specimens, this study showed that the mechanical response decreases in older specimens, and the decrease is greater in compressive than distractive properties. While the decrease is expected, the relative change between the two modes of loading has not been reported. Another conclusion from the study is that the mechanical properties depend on gender, although not as decisive due to sample size. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2944859/ /pubmed/20890410 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.65477 Text en © Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Stemper, Brian D.
Board, Derek
Yoganandan, Narayan
Wolfla, Christopher E.
Biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments
title Biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments
title_full Biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments
title_fullStr Biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments
title_short Biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments
title_sort biomechanical properties of human thoracic spine disc segments
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20890410
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.65477
work_keys_str_mv AT stemperbriand biomechanicalpropertiesofhumanthoracicspinediscsegments
AT boardderek biomechanicalpropertiesofhumanthoracicspinediscsegments
AT yoganandannarayan biomechanicalpropertiesofhumanthoracicspinediscsegments
AT wolflachristophere biomechanicalpropertiesofhumanthoracicspinediscsegments