Cargando…

Adherence and its Measurement in Phase 2/3 Microbicide Trials

Adherence optimization and measurement have emerged as critically challenging issues for clinical trials of topical microbicides. Although microbicide trials have routinely collected adherence data, their utilization in trial design, implementation, and interpretation has been inconsistent. Drawing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tolley, Elizabeth E., Harrison, Polly F., Goetghebeur, Els, Morrow, Kathleen, Pool, Robert, Taylor, Doug, Tillman, Stephanie N., van der Straten, Ariane
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19924525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-009-9635-x
_version_ 1782187153751539712
author Tolley, Elizabeth E.
Harrison, Polly F.
Goetghebeur, Els
Morrow, Kathleen
Pool, Robert
Taylor, Doug
Tillman, Stephanie N.
van der Straten, Ariane
author_facet Tolley, Elizabeth E.
Harrison, Polly F.
Goetghebeur, Els
Morrow, Kathleen
Pool, Robert
Taylor, Doug
Tillman, Stephanie N.
van der Straten, Ariane
author_sort Tolley, Elizabeth E.
collection PubMed
description Adherence optimization and measurement have emerged as critically challenging issues for clinical trials of topical microbicides. Although microbicide trials have routinely collected adherence data, their utilization in trial design, implementation, and interpretation has been inconsistent. Drawing on data-driven presentations from several focused meetings, this paper synthesizes lessons from past microbicide trials and provides recommendations for future trials of microbicide and other HIV prevention technologies. First, it describes four purposes for adherence data collection, with particular attention to intention-to-treat versus adherence-adjusted analyses for determining effectiveness. Second, the microbicide field’s experiences with adherence measures and data collection modes are discussed, including the strengths and weaknesses of various options and approaches for improving measurement. Then, several approaches to optimizing trial participants’ adherence are presented. The paper concludes with a set of recommendations for immediate use or further research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10461-009-9635-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Text
id pubmed-2944966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29449662010-10-12 Adherence and its Measurement in Phase 2/3 Microbicide Trials Tolley, Elizabeth E. Harrison, Polly F. Goetghebeur, Els Morrow, Kathleen Pool, Robert Taylor, Doug Tillman, Stephanie N. van der Straten, Ariane AIDS Behav Substantive Review Adherence optimization and measurement have emerged as critically challenging issues for clinical trials of topical microbicides. Although microbicide trials have routinely collected adherence data, their utilization in trial design, implementation, and interpretation has been inconsistent. Drawing on data-driven presentations from several focused meetings, this paper synthesizes lessons from past microbicide trials and provides recommendations for future trials of microbicide and other HIV prevention technologies. First, it describes four purposes for adherence data collection, with particular attention to intention-to-treat versus adherence-adjusted analyses for determining effectiveness. Second, the microbicide field’s experiences with adherence measures and data collection modes are discussed, including the strengths and weaknesses of various options and approaches for improving measurement. Then, several approaches to optimizing trial participants’ adherence are presented. The paper concludes with a set of recommendations for immediate use or further research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10461-009-9635-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2009-11-19 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2944966/ /pubmed/19924525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-009-9635-x Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Substantive Review
Tolley, Elizabeth E.
Harrison, Polly F.
Goetghebeur, Els
Morrow, Kathleen
Pool, Robert
Taylor, Doug
Tillman, Stephanie N.
van der Straten, Ariane
Adherence and its Measurement in Phase 2/3 Microbicide Trials
title Adherence and its Measurement in Phase 2/3 Microbicide Trials
title_full Adherence and its Measurement in Phase 2/3 Microbicide Trials
title_fullStr Adherence and its Measurement in Phase 2/3 Microbicide Trials
title_full_unstemmed Adherence and its Measurement in Phase 2/3 Microbicide Trials
title_short Adherence and its Measurement in Phase 2/3 Microbicide Trials
title_sort adherence and its measurement in phase 2/3 microbicide trials
topic Substantive Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19924525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-009-9635-x
work_keys_str_mv AT tolleyelizabethe adherenceanditsmeasurementinphase23microbicidetrials
AT harrisonpollyf adherenceanditsmeasurementinphase23microbicidetrials
AT goetghebeurels adherenceanditsmeasurementinphase23microbicidetrials
AT morrowkathleen adherenceanditsmeasurementinphase23microbicidetrials
AT poolrobert adherenceanditsmeasurementinphase23microbicidetrials
AT taylordoug adherenceanditsmeasurementinphase23microbicidetrials
AT tillmanstephanien adherenceanditsmeasurementinphase23microbicidetrials
AT vanderstratenariane adherenceanditsmeasurementinphase23microbicidetrials