Cargando…
Adherence and its Measurement in Phase 2/3 Microbicide Trials
Adherence optimization and measurement have emerged as critically challenging issues for clinical trials of topical microbicides. Although microbicide trials have routinely collected adherence data, their utilization in trial design, implementation, and interpretation has been inconsistent. Drawing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19924525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-009-9635-x |
_version_ | 1782187153751539712 |
---|---|
author | Tolley, Elizabeth E. Harrison, Polly F. Goetghebeur, Els Morrow, Kathleen Pool, Robert Taylor, Doug Tillman, Stephanie N. van der Straten, Ariane |
author_facet | Tolley, Elizabeth E. Harrison, Polly F. Goetghebeur, Els Morrow, Kathleen Pool, Robert Taylor, Doug Tillman, Stephanie N. van der Straten, Ariane |
author_sort | Tolley, Elizabeth E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Adherence optimization and measurement have emerged as critically challenging issues for clinical trials of topical microbicides. Although microbicide trials have routinely collected adherence data, their utilization in trial design, implementation, and interpretation has been inconsistent. Drawing on data-driven presentations from several focused meetings, this paper synthesizes lessons from past microbicide trials and provides recommendations for future trials of microbicide and other HIV prevention technologies. First, it describes four purposes for adherence data collection, with particular attention to intention-to-treat versus adherence-adjusted analyses for determining effectiveness. Second, the microbicide field’s experiences with adherence measures and data collection modes are discussed, including the strengths and weaknesses of various options and approaches for improving measurement. Then, several approaches to optimizing trial participants’ adherence are presented. The paper concludes with a set of recommendations for immediate use or further research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10461-009-9635-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2944966 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29449662010-10-12 Adherence and its Measurement in Phase 2/3 Microbicide Trials Tolley, Elizabeth E. Harrison, Polly F. Goetghebeur, Els Morrow, Kathleen Pool, Robert Taylor, Doug Tillman, Stephanie N. van der Straten, Ariane AIDS Behav Substantive Review Adherence optimization and measurement have emerged as critically challenging issues for clinical trials of topical microbicides. Although microbicide trials have routinely collected adherence data, their utilization in trial design, implementation, and interpretation has been inconsistent. Drawing on data-driven presentations from several focused meetings, this paper synthesizes lessons from past microbicide trials and provides recommendations for future trials of microbicide and other HIV prevention technologies. First, it describes four purposes for adherence data collection, with particular attention to intention-to-treat versus adherence-adjusted analyses for determining effectiveness. Second, the microbicide field’s experiences with adherence measures and data collection modes are discussed, including the strengths and weaknesses of various options and approaches for improving measurement. Then, several approaches to optimizing trial participants’ adherence are presented. The paper concludes with a set of recommendations for immediate use or further research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10461-009-9635-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2009-11-19 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2944966/ /pubmed/19924525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-009-9635-x Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Substantive Review Tolley, Elizabeth E. Harrison, Polly F. Goetghebeur, Els Morrow, Kathleen Pool, Robert Taylor, Doug Tillman, Stephanie N. van der Straten, Ariane Adherence and its Measurement in Phase 2/3 Microbicide Trials |
title | Adherence and its Measurement in Phase 2/3 Microbicide Trials |
title_full | Adherence and its Measurement in Phase 2/3 Microbicide Trials |
title_fullStr | Adherence and its Measurement in Phase 2/3 Microbicide Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Adherence and its Measurement in Phase 2/3 Microbicide Trials |
title_short | Adherence and its Measurement in Phase 2/3 Microbicide Trials |
title_sort | adherence and its measurement in phase 2/3 microbicide trials |
topic | Substantive Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19924525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-009-9635-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tolleyelizabethe adherenceanditsmeasurementinphase23microbicidetrials AT harrisonpollyf adherenceanditsmeasurementinphase23microbicidetrials AT goetghebeurels adherenceanditsmeasurementinphase23microbicidetrials AT morrowkathleen adherenceanditsmeasurementinphase23microbicidetrials AT poolrobert adherenceanditsmeasurementinphase23microbicidetrials AT taylordoug adherenceanditsmeasurementinphase23microbicidetrials AT tillmanstephanien adherenceanditsmeasurementinphase23microbicidetrials AT vanderstratenariane adherenceanditsmeasurementinphase23microbicidetrials |