Cargando…
Do recruitment maneuvers simply improve oxygenation?
Recruitment maneuvers have been the subject of intense investigation. Their role in the acute care setting is debated given the lack of information on their influence on clinical outcomes. Oxygenation improvement is often a striking effect, together with changes of respiratory mechanics. However, he...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2945070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20598114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9042 |
_version_ | 1782187174156828672 |
---|---|
author | Valenza, Franco |
author_facet | Valenza, Franco |
author_sort | Valenza, Franco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recruitment maneuvers have been the subject of intense investigation. Their role in the acute care setting is debated given the lack of information on their influence on clinical outcomes. Oxygenation improvement is often a striking effect, together with changes of respiratory mechanics. However, hemodynamic compromise is frequently associated with the maneuver, sometimes even barotrauma. Another possible downside is bacterial translocation secondary to lung overdistention, as suggested by experimental and initial clinical data. When a recruitment maneuver is performed, the patho-physiological consequences of lung recruitment should guide clinicians more than oxygenation improvement alone. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2945070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29450702011-07-01 Do recruitment maneuvers simply improve oxygenation? Valenza, Franco Crit Care Commentary Recruitment maneuvers have been the subject of intense investigation. Their role in the acute care setting is debated given the lack of information on their influence on clinical outcomes. Oxygenation improvement is often a striking effect, together with changes of respiratory mechanics. However, hemodynamic compromise is frequently associated with the maneuver, sometimes even barotrauma. Another possible downside is bacterial translocation secondary to lung overdistention, as suggested by experimental and initial clinical data. When a recruitment maneuver is performed, the patho-physiological consequences of lung recruitment should guide clinicians more than oxygenation improvement alone. BioMed Central 2010 2010-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2945070/ /pubmed/20598114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9042 Text en Copyright ©2010 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Valenza, Franco Do recruitment maneuvers simply improve oxygenation? |
title | Do recruitment maneuvers simply improve oxygenation? |
title_full | Do recruitment maneuvers simply improve oxygenation? |
title_fullStr | Do recruitment maneuvers simply improve oxygenation? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do recruitment maneuvers simply improve oxygenation? |
title_short | Do recruitment maneuvers simply improve oxygenation? |
title_sort | do recruitment maneuvers simply improve oxygenation? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2945070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20598114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9042 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT valenzafranco dorecruitmentmaneuverssimplyimproveoxygenation |