Cargando…

Positive end-expiratory pressure affects the value of intra-abdominal pressure in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a pilot study

INTRODUCTION: To examine the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in patients with acute lung injury (ALI). METHODS: Thirty sedated and mechanically ventilated patients with ALI or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) admitted to a sixteen-bed su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verzilli, Daniel, Constantin, Jean-Michel, Sebbane, Mustapha, Chanques, Gérald, Jung, Boris, Perrigault, Pierre-François, Malbrain, Manu, Jaber, Samir
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2945111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20663183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9193
_version_ 1782187184055386112
author Verzilli, Daniel
Constantin, Jean-Michel
Sebbane, Mustapha
Chanques, Gérald
Jung, Boris
Perrigault, Pierre-François
Malbrain, Manu
Jaber, Samir
author_facet Verzilli, Daniel
Constantin, Jean-Michel
Sebbane, Mustapha
Chanques, Gérald
Jung, Boris
Perrigault, Pierre-François
Malbrain, Manu
Jaber, Samir
author_sort Verzilli, Daniel
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To examine the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in patients with acute lung injury (ALI). METHODS: Thirty sedated and mechanically ventilated patients with ALI or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) admitted to a sixteen-bed surgical medical ICU were included. All patients were studied with sequentially increasing PEEP (0, 6 and 12 cmH(2)O) during a PEEP-trial. RESULTS: Age was 55 ± 17 years, weight was 70 ± 17 kg, SAPS II was 44 ± 14 and Pa(O2)/F(IO2 )was 192 ± 53 mmHg. The IAP was 12 ± 5 mmHg at PEEP 0 (zero end-expiratory pressure, ZEEP), 13 ± 5 mmHg at PEEP 6 and 15 ± 6 mmHg at PEEP 12 (P < 0.05 vs ZEEP). In the patients with intra-abdominal hypertension defined as IAP ≥ 12 mmHg (n = 15), IAP significantly increased from 15 ± 3 mmHg at ZEEP to 20 ± 3 mmHg at PEEP 12 (P < 0.01). Whereas in the patients with IAP < 12 mmHg (n = 15), IAP did not significantly change from ZEEP to PEEP 12 (8 ± 2 vs 10 ± 3 mmHg). In the 13 patients in whom cardiac output was measured, increase in PEEP from 0 to 12 cmH(2)O did not significantly change cardiac output, nor in the 8 out of 15 patients of the high-IAP group. The observed effects were similar in both ALI (n = 17) and ARDS (n = 13) patients. CONCLUSIONS: PEEP is a contributing factor that impacts IAP values. It seems necessary to take into account the level of PEEP whilst interpreting IAP values in patients under mechanical ventilation.
format Text
id pubmed-2945111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29451112010-09-25 Positive end-expiratory pressure affects the value of intra-abdominal pressure in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a pilot study Verzilli, Daniel Constantin, Jean-Michel Sebbane, Mustapha Chanques, Gérald Jung, Boris Perrigault, Pierre-François Malbrain, Manu Jaber, Samir Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: To examine the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in patients with acute lung injury (ALI). METHODS: Thirty sedated and mechanically ventilated patients with ALI or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) admitted to a sixteen-bed surgical medical ICU were included. All patients were studied with sequentially increasing PEEP (0, 6 and 12 cmH(2)O) during a PEEP-trial. RESULTS: Age was 55 ± 17 years, weight was 70 ± 17 kg, SAPS II was 44 ± 14 and Pa(O2)/F(IO2 )was 192 ± 53 mmHg. The IAP was 12 ± 5 mmHg at PEEP 0 (zero end-expiratory pressure, ZEEP), 13 ± 5 mmHg at PEEP 6 and 15 ± 6 mmHg at PEEP 12 (P < 0.05 vs ZEEP). In the patients with intra-abdominal hypertension defined as IAP ≥ 12 mmHg (n = 15), IAP significantly increased from 15 ± 3 mmHg at ZEEP to 20 ± 3 mmHg at PEEP 12 (P < 0.01). Whereas in the patients with IAP < 12 mmHg (n = 15), IAP did not significantly change from ZEEP to PEEP 12 (8 ± 2 vs 10 ± 3 mmHg). In the 13 patients in whom cardiac output was measured, increase in PEEP from 0 to 12 cmH(2)O did not significantly change cardiac output, nor in the 8 out of 15 patients of the high-IAP group. The observed effects were similar in both ALI (n = 17) and ARDS (n = 13) patients. CONCLUSIONS: PEEP is a contributing factor that impacts IAP values. It seems necessary to take into account the level of PEEP whilst interpreting IAP values in patients under mechanical ventilation. BioMed Central 2010 2010-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2945111/ /pubmed/20663183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9193 Text en Copyright ©2010 Verzilli et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Verzilli, Daniel
Constantin, Jean-Michel
Sebbane, Mustapha
Chanques, Gérald
Jung, Boris
Perrigault, Pierre-François
Malbrain, Manu
Jaber, Samir
Positive end-expiratory pressure affects the value of intra-abdominal pressure in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a pilot study
title Positive end-expiratory pressure affects the value of intra-abdominal pressure in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a pilot study
title_full Positive end-expiratory pressure affects the value of intra-abdominal pressure in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a pilot study
title_fullStr Positive end-expiratory pressure affects the value of intra-abdominal pressure in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Positive end-expiratory pressure affects the value of intra-abdominal pressure in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a pilot study
title_short Positive end-expiratory pressure affects the value of intra-abdominal pressure in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a pilot study
title_sort positive end-expiratory pressure affects the value of intra-abdominal pressure in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a pilot study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2945111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20663183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9193
work_keys_str_mv AT verzillidaniel positiveendexpiratorypressureaffectsthevalueofintraabdominalpressureinacutelunginjuryacuterespiratorydistresssyndromepatientsapilotstudy
AT constantinjeanmichel positiveendexpiratorypressureaffectsthevalueofintraabdominalpressureinacutelunginjuryacuterespiratorydistresssyndromepatientsapilotstudy
AT sebbanemustapha positiveendexpiratorypressureaffectsthevalueofintraabdominalpressureinacutelunginjuryacuterespiratorydistresssyndromepatientsapilotstudy
AT chanquesgerald positiveendexpiratorypressureaffectsthevalueofintraabdominalpressureinacutelunginjuryacuterespiratorydistresssyndromepatientsapilotstudy
AT jungboris positiveendexpiratorypressureaffectsthevalueofintraabdominalpressureinacutelunginjuryacuterespiratorydistresssyndromepatientsapilotstudy
AT perrigaultpierrefrancois positiveendexpiratorypressureaffectsthevalueofintraabdominalpressureinacutelunginjuryacuterespiratorydistresssyndromepatientsapilotstudy
AT malbrainmanu positiveendexpiratorypressureaffectsthevalueofintraabdominalpressureinacutelunginjuryacuterespiratorydistresssyndromepatientsapilotstudy
AT jabersamir positiveendexpiratorypressureaffectsthevalueofintraabdominalpressureinacutelunginjuryacuterespiratorydistresssyndromepatientsapilotstudy