Cargando…

Excellent outcomes of laparoscopic esophagomyotomy for achalasia in patients older than 60 years of age

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of an esophagomyotomy for dysphagia in elderly patients with achalasia has been questioned. This study was designed to provide an answer. METHODS: A total of 162 consecutive patients with achalasia who had a laparoscopic myotomy and Dor fundoplication and who were avail...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roll, Garrett R., Ma, Sandi, Gasper, Warren J., Patti, Marco, Way, Lawrence W., Carter, Jonathan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2945469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20361213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1003-4
_version_ 1782187220519616512
author Roll, Garrett R.
Ma, Sandi
Gasper, Warren J.
Patti, Marco
Way, Lawrence W.
Carter, Jonathan
author_facet Roll, Garrett R.
Ma, Sandi
Gasper, Warren J.
Patti, Marco
Way, Lawrence W.
Carter, Jonathan
author_sort Roll, Garrett R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of an esophagomyotomy for dysphagia in elderly patients with achalasia has been questioned. This study was designed to provide an answer. METHODS: A total of 162 consecutive patients with achalasia who had a laparoscopic myotomy and Dor fundoplication and who were available for follow-up interview were divided by age: <60 years (range, 14–59; 118 patients), and ≥60 years (range, 60–93; 44 patients). Primary outcome measures were severity of dysphagia, regurgitation, heartburn, and chest pain before and after the operation as assessed on a four-point Likert scale, and the need for postoperative dilatation or revisional surgery. RESULTS: Follow-up averaged 64 months. Older patients had less dysphagia (mean score 3.6 vs. 3.9; P < 0.01) and less chest pain (1.0 vs. 1.8; P < 0.01). Regurgitation (3.0 vs. 3.2; P = not significant (NS)) and heartburn (1.6 vs. 2.0, P = NS) were similar. Older patients were no different in degree of esophageal dilation, manometric findings, number of previous pneumatic dilatations, or previous botulinum toxin therapy. None of the older patients had previously had an esophagomyotomy, whereas 14% of younger patients had (P < 0.01). After laparoscopic myotomy, older patients had better relief of dysphagia (mean score 1.0 vs 1.6; P < 0.01), less heartburn (0.8 vs. 1.1; P = 0.03), and less chest pain (0.2 vs. 0.8, P < 0.01). Complication rates were similar. Older patients did not require more postoperative dilatations (22 patients vs. 10 patients; P = 0.7) or revisional surgery for recurrent or persistent symptoms (3 vs. 1 patients; P = 0.6). Satisfaction scores did not differ, and more than 90% of patients in both groups said in retrospect they would have undergone the procedure if they had known beforehand how it would turn out. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective review with long follow-up supports laparoscopic esophagomyotomy as first-line therapy in older patients with achalasia. They appeared to benefit even more than younger patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2945469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29454692010-10-12 Excellent outcomes of laparoscopic esophagomyotomy for achalasia in patients older than 60 years of age Roll, Garrett R. Ma, Sandi Gasper, Warren J. Patti, Marco Way, Lawrence W. Carter, Jonathan Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of an esophagomyotomy for dysphagia in elderly patients with achalasia has been questioned. This study was designed to provide an answer. METHODS: A total of 162 consecutive patients with achalasia who had a laparoscopic myotomy and Dor fundoplication and who were available for follow-up interview were divided by age: <60 years (range, 14–59; 118 patients), and ≥60 years (range, 60–93; 44 patients). Primary outcome measures were severity of dysphagia, regurgitation, heartburn, and chest pain before and after the operation as assessed on a four-point Likert scale, and the need for postoperative dilatation or revisional surgery. RESULTS: Follow-up averaged 64 months. Older patients had less dysphagia (mean score 3.6 vs. 3.9; P < 0.01) and less chest pain (1.0 vs. 1.8; P < 0.01). Regurgitation (3.0 vs. 3.2; P = not significant (NS)) and heartburn (1.6 vs. 2.0, P = NS) were similar. Older patients were no different in degree of esophageal dilation, manometric findings, number of previous pneumatic dilatations, or previous botulinum toxin therapy. None of the older patients had previously had an esophagomyotomy, whereas 14% of younger patients had (P < 0.01). After laparoscopic myotomy, older patients had better relief of dysphagia (mean score 1.0 vs 1.6; P < 0.01), less heartburn (0.8 vs. 1.1; P = 0.03), and less chest pain (0.2 vs. 0.8, P < 0.01). Complication rates were similar. Older patients did not require more postoperative dilatations (22 patients vs. 10 patients; P = 0.7) or revisional surgery for recurrent or persistent symptoms (3 vs. 1 patients; P = 0.6). Satisfaction scores did not differ, and more than 90% of patients in both groups said in retrospect they would have undergone the procedure if they had known beforehand how it would turn out. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective review with long follow-up supports laparoscopic esophagomyotomy as first-line therapy in older patients with achalasia. They appeared to benefit even more than younger patients. Springer-Verlag 2010-04-02 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2945469/ /pubmed/20361213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1003-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Roll, Garrett R.
Ma, Sandi
Gasper, Warren J.
Patti, Marco
Way, Lawrence W.
Carter, Jonathan
Excellent outcomes of laparoscopic esophagomyotomy for achalasia in patients older than 60 years of age
title Excellent outcomes of laparoscopic esophagomyotomy for achalasia in patients older than 60 years of age
title_full Excellent outcomes of laparoscopic esophagomyotomy for achalasia in patients older than 60 years of age
title_fullStr Excellent outcomes of laparoscopic esophagomyotomy for achalasia in patients older than 60 years of age
title_full_unstemmed Excellent outcomes of laparoscopic esophagomyotomy for achalasia in patients older than 60 years of age
title_short Excellent outcomes of laparoscopic esophagomyotomy for achalasia in patients older than 60 years of age
title_sort excellent outcomes of laparoscopic esophagomyotomy for achalasia in patients older than 60 years of age
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2945469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20361213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1003-4
work_keys_str_mv AT rollgarrettr excellentoutcomesoflaparoscopicesophagomyotomyforachalasiainpatientsolderthan60yearsofage
AT masandi excellentoutcomesoflaparoscopicesophagomyotomyforachalasiainpatientsolderthan60yearsofage
AT gasperwarrenj excellentoutcomesoflaparoscopicesophagomyotomyforachalasiainpatientsolderthan60yearsofage
AT pattimarco excellentoutcomesoflaparoscopicesophagomyotomyforachalasiainpatientsolderthan60yearsofage
AT waylawrencew excellentoutcomesoflaparoscopicesophagomyotomyforachalasiainpatientsolderthan60yearsofage
AT carterjonathan excellentoutcomesoflaparoscopicesophagomyotomyforachalasiainpatientsolderthan60yearsofage