Cargando…

Qualitative insights into general practitioners views on polypharmacy

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is common among older people. The purpose of this study is to describe GPs' views and beliefs on polypharmacy in order to identify the role of the GP in relation to improving prescribing behaviour. The awareness of these often established beliefs is key for understandin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anthierens, Sibyl, Tansens, Anneleen, Petrovic, Mirko, Christiaens, Thierry
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2945967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20840795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-65
_version_ 1782187258856603648
author Anthierens, Sibyl
Tansens, Anneleen
Petrovic, Mirko
Christiaens, Thierry
author_facet Anthierens, Sibyl
Tansens, Anneleen
Petrovic, Mirko
Christiaens, Thierry
author_sort Anthierens, Sibyl
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is common among older people. The purpose of this study is to describe GPs' views and beliefs on polypharmacy in order to identify the role of the GP in relation to improving prescribing behaviour. The awareness of these often established beliefs is key for understanding behaviour and promoting change which can guide action towards more rational prescribing. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive methodology was used with semi-structured interviews. Interviews were conducted with 65 GPs from the region of Aalst, a district of a mixed urban and rural population in Belgium. The aim of the study was to describe the GPs' perspectives on polypharmacy in primary care. RESULTS: GPs acknowledge that polypharmacy is a problem in their older patient population, especially because of the risk of adverse drug reactions, interactions and lowered adherence. GPs mention that difficulties in keeping an overview of the exact medication intake is an important problem caused by polypharmacy. The patients' strong belief in their medication and self-medication are seen as important barriers in reducing the number of drugs taken. Next to these patient related factors, there are some factors related to the prescriber, such as the lack of regular evaluation of the medication schedule by GPs and the involvement of several prescribers, especially in a hospital setting. According to the respondents, prevention and evidence based medicine guidelines often induce polypharmacy. CONCLUSIONS: GPs point out that polypharmacy is an important problem in their older patient population. They see an important role for themselves in optimizing drug regimens for their patients. However, they do not have a readymade solution for polypharmacy. The limited set of options for addressing polypharmacy leave GPs feeling powerless to tackle the problem. There is a need for simple GP friendly tools and access to pharmacotherapeutic advice. Future research in this area and interventions seeking to improve prescribing for the elderly will have to focus on practical tools and take into account the GPs' sense of helplessness.
format Text
id pubmed-2945967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29459672010-09-28 Qualitative insights into general practitioners views on polypharmacy Anthierens, Sibyl Tansens, Anneleen Petrovic, Mirko Christiaens, Thierry BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is common among older people. The purpose of this study is to describe GPs' views and beliefs on polypharmacy in order to identify the role of the GP in relation to improving prescribing behaviour. The awareness of these often established beliefs is key for understanding behaviour and promoting change which can guide action towards more rational prescribing. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive methodology was used with semi-structured interviews. Interviews were conducted with 65 GPs from the region of Aalst, a district of a mixed urban and rural population in Belgium. The aim of the study was to describe the GPs' perspectives on polypharmacy in primary care. RESULTS: GPs acknowledge that polypharmacy is a problem in their older patient population, especially because of the risk of adverse drug reactions, interactions and lowered adherence. GPs mention that difficulties in keeping an overview of the exact medication intake is an important problem caused by polypharmacy. The patients' strong belief in their medication and self-medication are seen as important barriers in reducing the number of drugs taken. Next to these patient related factors, there are some factors related to the prescriber, such as the lack of regular evaluation of the medication schedule by GPs and the involvement of several prescribers, especially in a hospital setting. According to the respondents, prevention and evidence based medicine guidelines often induce polypharmacy. CONCLUSIONS: GPs point out that polypharmacy is an important problem in their older patient population. They see an important role for themselves in optimizing drug regimens for their patients. However, they do not have a readymade solution for polypharmacy. The limited set of options for addressing polypharmacy leave GPs feeling powerless to tackle the problem. There is a need for simple GP friendly tools and access to pharmacotherapeutic advice. Future research in this area and interventions seeking to improve prescribing for the elderly will have to focus on practical tools and take into account the GPs' sense of helplessness. BioMed Central 2010-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2945967/ /pubmed/20840795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-65 Text en Copyright ©2010 Anthierens et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Anthierens, Sibyl
Tansens, Anneleen
Petrovic, Mirko
Christiaens, Thierry
Qualitative insights into general practitioners views on polypharmacy
title Qualitative insights into general practitioners views on polypharmacy
title_full Qualitative insights into general practitioners views on polypharmacy
title_fullStr Qualitative insights into general practitioners views on polypharmacy
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative insights into general practitioners views on polypharmacy
title_short Qualitative insights into general practitioners views on polypharmacy
title_sort qualitative insights into general practitioners views on polypharmacy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2945967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20840795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-65
work_keys_str_mv AT anthierenssibyl qualitativeinsightsintogeneralpractitionersviewsonpolypharmacy
AT tansensanneleen qualitativeinsightsintogeneralpractitionersviewsonpolypharmacy
AT petrovicmirko qualitativeinsightsintogeneralpractitionersviewsonpolypharmacy
AT christiaensthierry qualitativeinsightsintogeneralpractitionersviewsonpolypharmacy