Cargando…

Understanding reactions to an internet-delivered health-care intervention: accommodating user preferences for information provision

BACKGROUND: It is recognised as good practice to use qualitative methods to elicit users' views of internet-delivered health-care interventions during their development. This paper seeks to illustrate the advantages of combining usability testing with 'theoretical modelling', i.e. ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yardley, Lucy, Morrison, Leanne G, Andreou, Panayiota, Joseph, Judith, Little, Paul
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2946266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20849599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-10-52
_version_ 1782187276034375680
author Yardley, Lucy
Morrison, Leanne G
Andreou, Panayiota
Joseph, Judith
Little, Paul
author_facet Yardley, Lucy
Morrison, Leanne G
Andreou, Panayiota
Joseph, Judith
Little, Paul
author_sort Yardley, Lucy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is recognised as good practice to use qualitative methods to elicit users' views of internet-delivered health-care interventions during their development. This paper seeks to illustrate the advantages of combining usability testing with 'theoretical modelling', i.e. analyses that relate the findings of qualitative studies during intervention development to social science theory, in order to gain deeper insights into the reasons and context for how people respond to the intervention. This paper illustrates how usability testing may be enriched by theoretical modelling by means of two qualitative studies of users' views of the delivery of information in an internet-delivered intervention to help users decide whether they needed to seek medical care for their cold or flu symptoms. METHODS: In Study 1, 21 participants recruited from a city in southern England were asked to 'think aloud' while viewing draft web-pages presented in paper format. In Study 2, views of our prototype website were elicited, again using think aloud methods, in a sample of 26 participants purposively sampled for diversity in education levels. Both data-sets were analysed by thematic analysis. RESULTS: Study 1 revealed that although the information provided by the draft web-pages had many of the intended empowering benefits, users often felt overwhelmed by the quantity of information. Relating these findings to theory and research on factors influencing preferences for information-seeking we hypothesised that to meet the needs of different users (especially those with lower literacy levels) our website should be designed to provide only essential personalised advice, but with options to access further information. Study 2 showed that our website design did prove accessible to users with different literacy levels. However, some users seemed to want still greater control over how information was accessed. CONCLUSIONS: Educational level need not be an insuperable barrier to appreciating web-based access to detailed health-related information, provided that users feel they can quickly gain access to the specific information they seek.
format Text
id pubmed-2946266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29462662010-09-28 Understanding reactions to an internet-delivered health-care intervention: accommodating user preferences for information provision Yardley, Lucy Morrison, Leanne G Andreou, Panayiota Joseph, Judith Little, Paul BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: It is recognised as good practice to use qualitative methods to elicit users' views of internet-delivered health-care interventions during their development. This paper seeks to illustrate the advantages of combining usability testing with 'theoretical modelling', i.e. analyses that relate the findings of qualitative studies during intervention development to social science theory, in order to gain deeper insights into the reasons and context for how people respond to the intervention. This paper illustrates how usability testing may be enriched by theoretical modelling by means of two qualitative studies of users' views of the delivery of information in an internet-delivered intervention to help users decide whether they needed to seek medical care for their cold or flu symptoms. METHODS: In Study 1, 21 participants recruited from a city in southern England were asked to 'think aloud' while viewing draft web-pages presented in paper format. In Study 2, views of our prototype website were elicited, again using think aloud methods, in a sample of 26 participants purposively sampled for diversity in education levels. Both data-sets were analysed by thematic analysis. RESULTS: Study 1 revealed that although the information provided by the draft web-pages had many of the intended empowering benefits, users often felt overwhelmed by the quantity of information. Relating these findings to theory and research on factors influencing preferences for information-seeking we hypothesised that to meet the needs of different users (especially those with lower literacy levels) our website should be designed to provide only essential personalised advice, but with options to access further information. Study 2 showed that our website design did prove accessible to users with different literacy levels. However, some users seemed to want still greater control over how information was accessed. CONCLUSIONS: Educational level need not be an insuperable barrier to appreciating web-based access to detailed health-related information, provided that users feel they can quickly gain access to the specific information they seek. BioMed Central 2010-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2946266/ /pubmed/20849599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-10-52 Text en Copyright ©2010 Yardley et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yardley, Lucy
Morrison, Leanne G
Andreou, Panayiota
Joseph, Judith
Little, Paul
Understanding reactions to an internet-delivered health-care intervention: accommodating user preferences for information provision
title Understanding reactions to an internet-delivered health-care intervention: accommodating user preferences for information provision
title_full Understanding reactions to an internet-delivered health-care intervention: accommodating user preferences for information provision
title_fullStr Understanding reactions to an internet-delivered health-care intervention: accommodating user preferences for information provision
title_full_unstemmed Understanding reactions to an internet-delivered health-care intervention: accommodating user preferences for information provision
title_short Understanding reactions to an internet-delivered health-care intervention: accommodating user preferences for information provision
title_sort understanding reactions to an internet-delivered health-care intervention: accommodating user preferences for information provision
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2946266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20849599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-10-52
work_keys_str_mv AT yardleylucy understandingreactionstoaninternetdeliveredhealthcareinterventionaccommodatinguserpreferencesforinformationprovision
AT morrisonleanneg understandingreactionstoaninternetdeliveredhealthcareinterventionaccommodatinguserpreferencesforinformationprovision
AT andreoupanayiota understandingreactionstoaninternetdeliveredhealthcareinterventionaccommodatinguserpreferencesforinformationprovision
AT josephjudith understandingreactionstoaninternetdeliveredhealthcareinterventionaccommodatinguserpreferencesforinformationprovision
AT littlepaul understandingreactionstoaninternetdeliveredhealthcareinterventionaccommodatinguserpreferencesforinformationprovision