Cargando…
Characterization of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging: Do Nonhigh Grade and High Grade Show Different Imaging Features?
To characterize imaging features of pure DCIS on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DCE-MRI), 31 consecutive patients (37-81 years old, mean 56), including 2 Grade I, 16 Grade II, and 13 Grade III, were studied. MR images were reviewed retrospectively and the morphological appearances and kinetic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2946595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20885929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/431341 |
_version_ | 1782187310294499328 |
---|---|
author | Chan, Siwa Chen, Jeon-Hor Agrawal, Garima Lin, Muqing Mehta, Rita S. Carpenter, Philip M. Nalcioglu, Orhan Su, Min-Ying |
author_facet | Chan, Siwa Chen, Jeon-Hor Agrawal, Garima Lin, Muqing Mehta, Rita S. Carpenter, Philip M. Nalcioglu, Orhan Su, Min-Ying |
author_sort | Chan, Siwa |
collection | PubMed |
description | To characterize imaging features of pure DCIS on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DCE-MRI), 31 consecutive patients (37-81 years old, mean 56), including 2 Grade I, 16 Grade II, and 13 Grade III, were studied. MR images were reviewed retrospectively and the morphological appearances and kinetic features of breast lesions were categorized according to the ACR BI-RADS breast MRI lexicon. DCE-MRI was a sensitive imaging modality in detecting pure DCIS. MR imaging showed enhancing lesions in 29/31 (94%) cases. Pure DCIS appeared as mass type or non-mass lesions on MRI with nearly equal frequency. The 29 MR detected lesions include 15 mass lesions (52%), and 14 lesions showing non-mass-like lesions (48%). For the mass lesions, the most frequent presentations were irregular shape (50%), irregular margin (50%) and heterogeneous enhancement (67%). For the non-mass-like lesions, the clumped internal enhancement pattern was the dominate feature, seen in 9/14 cases (64%). Regarding enhancement kinetic curve, 21/29 (78%) lesions showed suspicious malignant type kinetics. No significant difference was found in morphology (P > .05), tumor size (P = 0.21), and kinetic characteristics (P = .38) between non-high grade (I+II) and high-grade (III) pure DCIS. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2946595 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29465952010-09-30 Characterization of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging: Do Nonhigh Grade and High Grade Show Different Imaging Features? Chan, Siwa Chen, Jeon-Hor Agrawal, Garima Lin, Muqing Mehta, Rita S. Carpenter, Philip M. Nalcioglu, Orhan Su, Min-Ying J Oncol Clinical Study To characterize imaging features of pure DCIS on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DCE-MRI), 31 consecutive patients (37-81 years old, mean 56), including 2 Grade I, 16 Grade II, and 13 Grade III, were studied. MR images were reviewed retrospectively and the morphological appearances and kinetic features of breast lesions were categorized according to the ACR BI-RADS breast MRI lexicon. DCE-MRI was a sensitive imaging modality in detecting pure DCIS. MR imaging showed enhancing lesions in 29/31 (94%) cases. Pure DCIS appeared as mass type or non-mass lesions on MRI with nearly equal frequency. The 29 MR detected lesions include 15 mass lesions (52%), and 14 lesions showing non-mass-like lesions (48%). For the mass lesions, the most frequent presentations were irregular shape (50%), irregular margin (50%) and heterogeneous enhancement (67%). For the non-mass-like lesions, the clumped internal enhancement pattern was the dominate feature, seen in 9/14 cases (64%). Regarding enhancement kinetic curve, 21/29 (78%) lesions showed suspicious malignant type kinetics. No significant difference was found in morphology (P > .05), tumor size (P = 0.21), and kinetic characteristics (P = .38) between non-high grade (I+II) and high-grade (III) pure DCIS. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010 2010-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2946595/ /pubmed/20885929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/431341 Text en Copyright © 2010 Siwa Chan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Chan, Siwa Chen, Jeon-Hor Agrawal, Garima Lin, Muqing Mehta, Rita S. Carpenter, Philip M. Nalcioglu, Orhan Su, Min-Ying Characterization of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging: Do Nonhigh Grade and High Grade Show Different Imaging Features? |
title | Characterization of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging: Do Nonhigh Grade and High Grade Show Different Imaging Features? |
title_full | Characterization of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging: Do Nonhigh Grade and High Grade Show Different Imaging Features? |
title_fullStr | Characterization of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging: Do Nonhigh Grade and High Grade Show Different Imaging Features? |
title_full_unstemmed | Characterization of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging: Do Nonhigh Grade and High Grade Show Different Imaging Features? |
title_short | Characterization of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging: Do Nonhigh Grade and High Grade Show Different Imaging Features? |
title_sort | characterization of pure ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic contrast-enhanced mr imaging: do nonhigh grade and high grade show different imaging features? |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2946595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20885929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/431341 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chansiwa characterizationofpureductalcarcinomainsituondynamiccontrastenhancedmrimagingdononhighgradeandhighgradeshowdifferentimagingfeatures AT chenjeonhor characterizationofpureductalcarcinomainsituondynamiccontrastenhancedmrimagingdononhighgradeandhighgradeshowdifferentimagingfeatures AT agrawalgarima characterizationofpureductalcarcinomainsituondynamiccontrastenhancedmrimagingdononhighgradeandhighgradeshowdifferentimagingfeatures AT linmuqing characterizationofpureductalcarcinomainsituondynamiccontrastenhancedmrimagingdononhighgradeandhighgradeshowdifferentimagingfeatures AT mehtaritas characterizationofpureductalcarcinomainsituondynamiccontrastenhancedmrimagingdononhighgradeandhighgradeshowdifferentimagingfeatures AT carpenterphilipm characterizationofpureductalcarcinomainsituondynamiccontrastenhancedmrimagingdononhighgradeandhighgradeshowdifferentimagingfeatures AT nalciogluorhan characterizationofpureductalcarcinomainsituondynamiccontrastenhancedmrimagingdononhighgradeandhighgradeshowdifferentimagingfeatures AT suminying characterizationofpureductalcarcinomainsituondynamiccontrastenhancedmrimagingdononhighgradeandhighgradeshowdifferentimagingfeatures |