Cargando…
Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? Moving Toward Assessment
The human rights responsibilities of drug companies have been considered for years by nongovernmental organizations, but were most sharply defined in a report by the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to health, submitted to the United Nations General Assembly in August 2008. The “Human Rights Guide...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2946953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20927356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000310 |
_version_ | 1782187351741562880 |
---|---|
author | Gruskin, Sofia Raad, Zyde |
author_facet | Gruskin, Sofia Raad, Zyde |
author_sort | Gruskin, Sofia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The human rights responsibilities of drug companies have been considered for years by nongovernmental organizations, but were most sharply defined in a report by the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to health, submitted to the United Nations General Assembly in August 2008. The “Human Rights Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Companies in relation to Access to Medicines” include responsibilities for transparency, management, monitoring and accountability, pricing, and ethical marketing, and against lobbying for more protection in intellectual property laws, applying for patents for trivial modifications of existing medicines, inappropriate drug promotion, and excessive pricing. Two years after the release of the Guidelines, the PLoS Medicine Debate asks whether drug companies are living up to their human rights responsibilities. Sofia Gruskin and Zyde Raad from the Harvard School of Public Health say more assessment is needed of such responsibilities; Geralyn Ritter, Vice President of Global Public Policy and Corporate Responsibility at Merck & Co. argues that multiple stakeholders could do more to help States deliver the right to health; and Paul Hunt and Rajat Khosla introduce Mr. Hunt's work as the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to the highest attainable standard of health, regarding the human rights responsibilities of pharmaceutical companies and access to medicines. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2946953 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29469532010-10-06 Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? Moving Toward Assessment Gruskin, Sofia Raad, Zyde PLoS Med The PLoS Medicine Debate The human rights responsibilities of drug companies have been considered for years by nongovernmental organizations, but were most sharply defined in a report by the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to health, submitted to the United Nations General Assembly in August 2008. The “Human Rights Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Companies in relation to Access to Medicines” include responsibilities for transparency, management, monitoring and accountability, pricing, and ethical marketing, and against lobbying for more protection in intellectual property laws, applying for patents for trivial modifications of existing medicines, inappropriate drug promotion, and excessive pricing. Two years after the release of the Guidelines, the PLoS Medicine Debate asks whether drug companies are living up to their human rights responsibilities. Sofia Gruskin and Zyde Raad from the Harvard School of Public Health say more assessment is needed of such responsibilities; Geralyn Ritter, Vice President of Global Public Policy and Corporate Responsibility at Merck & Co. argues that multiple stakeholders could do more to help States deliver the right to health; and Paul Hunt and Rajat Khosla introduce Mr. Hunt's work as the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to the highest attainable standard of health, regarding the human rights responsibilities of pharmaceutical companies and access to medicines. Public Library of Science 2010-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2946953/ /pubmed/20927356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000310 Text en Gruskin, Raad. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | The PLoS Medicine Debate Gruskin, Sofia Raad, Zyde Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? Moving Toward Assessment |
title | Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? Moving Toward Assessment |
title_full | Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? Moving Toward Assessment |
title_fullStr | Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? Moving Toward Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? Moving Toward Assessment |
title_short | Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? Moving Toward Assessment |
title_sort | are drug companies living up to their human rights responsibilities? moving toward assessment |
topic | The PLoS Medicine Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2946953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20927356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000310 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gruskinsofia aredrugcompanieslivinguptotheirhumanrightsresponsibilitiesmovingtowardassessment AT raadzyde aredrugcompanieslivinguptotheirhumanrightsresponsibilitiesmovingtowardassessment |