Cargando…

Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? Moving Toward Assessment

The human rights responsibilities of drug companies have been considered for years by nongovernmental organizations, but were most sharply defined in a report by the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to health, submitted to the United Nations General Assembly in August 2008. The “Human Rights Guide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gruskin, Sofia, Raad, Zyde
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2946953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20927356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000310
_version_ 1782187351741562880
author Gruskin, Sofia
Raad, Zyde
author_facet Gruskin, Sofia
Raad, Zyde
author_sort Gruskin, Sofia
collection PubMed
description The human rights responsibilities of drug companies have been considered for years by nongovernmental organizations, but were most sharply defined in a report by the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to health, submitted to the United Nations General Assembly in August 2008. The “Human Rights Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Companies in relation to Access to Medicines” include responsibilities for transparency, management, monitoring and accountability, pricing, and ethical marketing, and against lobbying for more protection in intellectual property laws, applying for patents for trivial modifications of existing medicines, inappropriate drug promotion, and excessive pricing. Two years after the release of the Guidelines, the PLoS Medicine Debate asks whether drug companies are living up to their human rights responsibilities. Sofia Gruskin and Zyde Raad from the Harvard School of Public Health say more assessment is needed of such responsibilities; Geralyn Ritter, Vice President of Global Public Policy and Corporate Responsibility at Merck & Co. argues that multiple stakeholders could do more to help States deliver the right to health; and Paul Hunt and Rajat Khosla introduce Mr. Hunt's work as the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to the highest attainable standard of health, regarding the human rights responsibilities of pharmaceutical companies and access to medicines.
format Text
id pubmed-2946953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29469532010-10-06 Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? Moving Toward Assessment Gruskin, Sofia Raad, Zyde PLoS Med The PLoS Medicine Debate The human rights responsibilities of drug companies have been considered for years by nongovernmental organizations, but were most sharply defined in a report by the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to health, submitted to the United Nations General Assembly in August 2008. The “Human Rights Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Companies in relation to Access to Medicines” include responsibilities for transparency, management, monitoring and accountability, pricing, and ethical marketing, and against lobbying for more protection in intellectual property laws, applying for patents for trivial modifications of existing medicines, inappropriate drug promotion, and excessive pricing. Two years after the release of the Guidelines, the PLoS Medicine Debate asks whether drug companies are living up to their human rights responsibilities. Sofia Gruskin and Zyde Raad from the Harvard School of Public Health say more assessment is needed of such responsibilities; Geralyn Ritter, Vice President of Global Public Policy and Corporate Responsibility at Merck & Co. argues that multiple stakeholders could do more to help States deliver the right to health; and Paul Hunt and Rajat Khosla introduce Mr. Hunt's work as the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to the highest attainable standard of health, regarding the human rights responsibilities of pharmaceutical companies and access to medicines. Public Library of Science 2010-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2946953/ /pubmed/20927356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000310 Text en Gruskin, Raad. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle The PLoS Medicine Debate
Gruskin, Sofia
Raad, Zyde
Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? Moving Toward Assessment
title Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? Moving Toward Assessment
title_full Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? Moving Toward Assessment
title_fullStr Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? Moving Toward Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? Moving Toward Assessment
title_short Are Drug Companies Living Up to Their Human Rights Responsibilities? Moving Toward Assessment
title_sort are drug companies living up to their human rights responsibilities? moving toward assessment
topic The PLoS Medicine Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2946953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20927356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000310
work_keys_str_mv AT gruskinsofia aredrugcompanieslivinguptotheirhumanrightsresponsibilitiesmovingtowardassessment
AT raadzyde aredrugcompanieslivinguptotheirhumanrightsresponsibilitiesmovingtowardassessment