Cargando…

Responsiveness of AF6, a new, short, validated, atrial fibrillation-specific questionnaire—symptomatic benefit of direct current cardioversion

OBJECTIVES: To measure the effects on symptoms of electrical cardioversion (DC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) by means of a new, short, validated, AF-specific questionnaire, the AF6. METHODS: One hundred eleven patients (67 ± 12 years, 89 men) were screened before and 12 ± 3 days after D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Härdén, Marie, Nyström, Britta, Bengtson, Ann, Medin, Jennie, Frison, Lars, Edvardsson, Nils
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2947005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20461545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-010-9487-3
_version_ 1782187356610101248
author Härdén, Marie
Nyström, Britta
Bengtson, Ann
Medin, Jennie
Frison, Lars
Edvardsson, Nils
author_facet Härdén, Marie
Nyström, Britta
Bengtson, Ann
Medin, Jennie
Frison, Lars
Edvardsson, Nils
author_sort Härdén, Marie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To measure the effects on symptoms of electrical cardioversion (DC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) by means of a new, short, validated, AF-specific questionnaire, the AF6. METHODS: One hundred eleven patients (67 ± 12 years, 89 men) were screened before and 12 ± 3 days after DC using AF6, covering ‘breathing difficulties at rest’, ‘breathing difficulties on exertion’, ‘limitations in day-to-day life due to atrial fibrillation’, ‘feeling of discomfort due to atrial fibrillation’, ‘tiredness due to atrial fibrillation’, and ‘worry/anxiety due to atrial fibrillation’. A single global score was calculated. The Toronto AF Symptoms and Severity Check List (AFSS) and the generic SF-36 were also administered. Patients in sinus rhythm at 12 ± 3 days (n = 56) were defined as responders and patients in AF (n = 55) as non-responders. RESULTS: The mean single global score decreased in all patients (18 ± 12.4 to 13 ± 11.6, p < 0.0001) and in responders (22 ± 14 vs. 12 ± 12, p < 0.01) but not in non-responders (14 ± 9 vs. 14 ± 11, N.S). The AFSS frequency scores decreased from 14.5 ± 7.7 to 9.5 ± 7.8 in responders, p = 0.001, but not in non-responders. There was a strong correlation between changes in the AF6 and the SF-36 regarding four of the six items. Effect sizes of AF6 ranged from 0 to 0.52 in all patients, in responders from 0.10 to 0.85 and in non-responders from −0.23 to 0.34, the highest figures consistently referring to ‘tiredness due to atrial fibrillation’. CONCLUSIONS: The symptom scores measured by AF6 decreased significantly, especially in responders. AF6 demonstrated adequate responsiveness to change, and effect sizes were mostly moderate, in responders moderate to high.
format Text
id pubmed-2947005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29470052010-10-12 Responsiveness of AF6, a new, short, validated, atrial fibrillation-specific questionnaire—symptomatic benefit of direct current cardioversion Härdén, Marie Nyström, Britta Bengtson, Ann Medin, Jennie Frison, Lars Edvardsson, Nils J Interv Card Electrophysiol Article OBJECTIVES: To measure the effects on symptoms of electrical cardioversion (DC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) by means of a new, short, validated, AF-specific questionnaire, the AF6. METHODS: One hundred eleven patients (67 ± 12 years, 89 men) were screened before and 12 ± 3 days after DC using AF6, covering ‘breathing difficulties at rest’, ‘breathing difficulties on exertion’, ‘limitations in day-to-day life due to atrial fibrillation’, ‘feeling of discomfort due to atrial fibrillation’, ‘tiredness due to atrial fibrillation’, and ‘worry/anxiety due to atrial fibrillation’. A single global score was calculated. The Toronto AF Symptoms and Severity Check List (AFSS) and the generic SF-36 were also administered. Patients in sinus rhythm at 12 ± 3 days (n = 56) were defined as responders and patients in AF (n = 55) as non-responders. RESULTS: The mean single global score decreased in all patients (18 ± 12.4 to 13 ± 11.6, p < 0.0001) and in responders (22 ± 14 vs. 12 ± 12, p < 0.01) but not in non-responders (14 ± 9 vs. 14 ± 11, N.S). The AFSS frequency scores decreased from 14.5 ± 7.7 to 9.5 ± 7.8 in responders, p = 0.001, but not in non-responders. There was a strong correlation between changes in the AF6 and the SF-36 regarding four of the six items. Effect sizes of AF6 ranged from 0 to 0.52 in all patients, in responders from 0.10 to 0.85 and in non-responders from −0.23 to 0.34, the highest figures consistently referring to ‘tiredness due to atrial fibrillation’. CONCLUSIONS: The symptom scores measured by AF6 decreased significantly, especially in responders. AF6 demonstrated adequate responsiveness to change, and effect sizes were mostly moderate, in responders moderate to high. Springer US 2010-05-12 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2947005/ /pubmed/20461545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-010-9487-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Härdén, Marie
Nyström, Britta
Bengtson, Ann
Medin, Jennie
Frison, Lars
Edvardsson, Nils
Responsiveness of AF6, a new, short, validated, atrial fibrillation-specific questionnaire—symptomatic benefit of direct current cardioversion
title Responsiveness of AF6, a new, short, validated, atrial fibrillation-specific questionnaire—symptomatic benefit of direct current cardioversion
title_full Responsiveness of AF6, a new, short, validated, atrial fibrillation-specific questionnaire—symptomatic benefit of direct current cardioversion
title_fullStr Responsiveness of AF6, a new, short, validated, atrial fibrillation-specific questionnaire—symptomatic benefit of direct current cardioversion
title_full_unstemmed Responsiveness of AF6, a new, short, validated, atrial fibrillation-specific questionnaire—symptomatic benefit of direct current cardioversion
title_short Responsiveness of AF6, a new, short, validated, atrial fibrillation-specific questionnaire—symptomatic benefit of direct current cardioversion
title_sort responsiveness of af6, a new, short, validated, atrial fibrillation-specific questionnaire—symptomatic benefit of direct current cardioversion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2947005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20461545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-010-9487-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hardenmarie responsivenessofaf6anewshortvalidatedatrialfibrillationspecificquestionnairesymptomaticbenefitofdirectcurrentcardioversion
AT nystrombritta responsivenessofaf6anewshortvalidatedatrialfibrillationspecificquestionnairesymptomaticbenefitofdirectcurrentcardioversion
AT bengtsonann responsivenessofaf6anewshortvalidatedatrialfibrillationspecificquestionnairesymptomaticbenefitofdirectcurrentcardioversion
AT medinjennie responsivenessofaf6anewshortvalidatedatrialfibrillationspecificquestionnairesymptomaticbenefitofdirectcurrentcardioversion
AT frisonlars responsivenessofaf6anewshortvalidatedatrialfibrillationspecificquestionnairesymptomaticbenefitofdirectcurrentcardioversion
AT edvardssonnils responsivenessofaf6anewshortvalidatedatrialfibrillationspecificquestionnairesymptomaticbenefitofdirectcurrentcardioversion