Cargando…

The Influence of Hepatic Function on Prostate Cancer Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy

Prostate growth is dependent on circulating androgens which can be influenced by hepatic function. Liver disease has been suggested to influence prostate cancer (CaP) incidence. However, the effect of hepatic function on CaP outcomes has not been investigated. A total of 1,181 patients who underwent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bañez, Lionel L., Loftis, Richard M., Freedland, Stephen J., Presti, Joseph C., Aronson, William J., Amling, Christopher L., Kane, Christopher J., Terris, Martha K.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2947348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20195294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2010.3
_version_ 1782187368746319872
author Bañez, Lionel L.
Loftis, Richard M.
Freedland, Stephen J.
Presti, Joseph C.
Aronson, William J.
Amling, Christopher L.
Kane, Christopher J.
Terris, Martha K.
author_facet Bañez, Lionel L.
Loftis, Richard M.
Freedland, Stephen J.
Presti, Joseph C.
Aronson, William J.
Amling, Christopher L.
Kane, Christopher J.
Terris, Martha K.
author_sort Bañez, Lionel L.
collection PubMed
description Prostate growth is dependent on circulating androgens which can be influenced by hepatic function. Liver disease has been suggested to influence prostate cancer (CaP) incidence. However, the effect of hepatic function on CaP outcomes has not been investigated. A total of 1,181 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) between 1988 and 2008 at four Veterans Affairs hospitals that comprise the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database and had available liver function test (LFT) data were included in the study. Independent associations of LFTs with unfavorable pathological features and biochemical recurrence were determined using logistic and Cox regression analyses. Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) levels were elevated in 8.2% and 4.4% of patients, respectively. After controlling for CaP features, logistic regression revealed a significant association between SGOT levels and pathological Gleason sum ≥7(4+3) cancer (odds ratio=2.12; 95% confidence interval=1.11-4.05; p=0.02). Mild hepatic dysfunction was significantly associated with adverse CaP grade but was not significantly associated with other adverse pathological features or biochemical recurrence in a cohort of men undergoing R. The effect of moderate to severe liver disease on disease outcomes in CaP patients managed non-surgically remains to be investigated.
format Text
id pubmed-2947348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29473482010-12-01 The Influence of Hepatic Function on Prostate Cancer Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy Bañez, Lionel L. Loftis, Richard M. Freedland, Stephen J. Presti, Joseph C. Aronson, William J. Amling, Christopher L. Kane, Christopher J. Terris, Martha K. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Article Prostate growth is dependent on circulating androgens which can be influenced by hepatic function. Liver disease has been suggested to influence prostate cancer (CaP) incidence. However, the effect of hepatic function on CaP outcomes has not been investigated. A total of 1,181 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) between 1988 and 2008 at four Veterans Affairs hospitals that comprise the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database and had available liver function test (LFT) data were included in the study. Independent associations of LFTs with unfavorable pathological features and biochemical recurrence were determined using logistic and Cox regression analyses. Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) levels were elevated in 8.2% and 4.4% of patients, respectively. After controlling for CaP features, logistic regression revealed a significant association between SGOT levels and pathological Gleason sum ≥7(4+3) cancer (odds ratio=2.12; 95% confidence interval=1.11-4.05; p=0.02). Mild hepatic dysfunction was significantly associated with adverse CaP grade but was not significantly associated with other adverse pathological features or biochemical recurrence in a cohort of men undergoing R. The effect of moderate to severe liver disease on disease outcomes in CaP patients managed non-surgically remains to be investigated. 2010-03-02 2010-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2947348/ /pubmed/20195294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2010.3 Text en Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Bañez, Lionel L.
Loftis, Richard M.
Freedland, Stephen J.
Presti, Joseph C.
Aronson, William J.
Amling, Christopher L.
Kane, Christopher J.
Terris, Martha K.
The Influence of Hepatic Function on Prostate Cancer Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy
title The Influence of Hepatic Function on Prostate Cancer Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy
title_full The Influence of Hepatic Function on Prostate Cancer Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy
title_fullStr The Influence of Hepatic Function on Prostate Cancer Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Hepatic Function on Prostate Cancer Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy
title_short The Influence of Hepatic Function on Prostate Cancer Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy
title_sort influence of hepatic function on prostate cancer outcomes following radical prostatectomy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2947348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20195294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2010.3
work_keys_str_mv AT banezlionell theinfluenceofhepaticfunctiononprostatecanceroutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT loftisrichardm theinfluenceofhepaticfunctiononprostatecanceroutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT freedlandstephenj theinfluenceofhepaticfunctiononprostatecanceroutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT prestijosephc theinfluenceofhepaticfunctiononprostatecanceroutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT aronsonwilliamj theinfluenceofhepaticfunctiononprostatecanceroutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT amlingchristopherl theinfluenceofhepaticfunctiononprostatecanceroutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT kanechristopherj theinfluenceofhepaticfunctiononprostatecanceroutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT terrismarthak theinfluenceofhepaticfunctiononprostatecanceroutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT banezlionell influenceofhepaticfunctiononprostatecanceroutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT loftisrichardm influenceofhepaticfunctiononprostatecanceroutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT freedlandstephenj influenceofhepaticfunctiononprostatecanceroutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT prestijosephc influenceofhepaticfunctiononprostatecanceroutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT aronsonwilliamj influenceofhepaticfunctiononprostatecanceroutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT amlingchristopherl influenceofhepaticfunctiononprostatecanceroutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT kanechristopherj influenceofhepaticfunctiononprostatecanceroutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomy
AT terrismarthak influenceofhepaticfunctiononprostatecanceroutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomy