Cargando…

Predators Are Attracted to the Olfactory Signals of Prey

BACKGROUND: Predator attraction to prey social signals can force prey to trade-off the social imperatives to communicate against the profound effect of predation on their future fitness. These tradeoffs underlie theories on the design and evolution of conspecific signalling systems and have received...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughes, Nelika K., Price, Catherine J., Banks, Peter B.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2948037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20927352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013114
_version_ 1782187416661000192
author Hughes, Nelika K.
Price, Catherine J.
Banks, Peter B.
author_facet Hughes, Nelika K.
Price, Catherine J.
Banks, Peter B.
author_sort Hughes, Nelika K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Predator attraction to prey social signals can force prey to trade-off the social imperatives to communicate against the profound effect of predation on their future fitness. These tradeoffs underlie theories on the design and evolution of conspecific signalling systems and have received much attention in visual and acoustic signalling modes. Yet while most territorial mammals communicate using olfactory signals and olfactory hunting is widespread in predators, evidence for the attraction of predators to prey olfactory signals under field conditions is lacking. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To redress this fundamental issue, we examined the attraction of free-roaming predators to discrete patches of scents collected from groups of two and six adult, male house mice, Mus domesticus, which primarily communicate through olfaction. Olfactorily-hunting predators were rapidly attracted to mouse scent signals, visiting mouse scented locations sooner, and in greater number, than control locations. There were no effects of signal concentration on predator attraction to their prey's signals. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This implies that communication will be costly if conspecific receivers and eavesdropping predators are simultaneously attracted to a signal. Significantly, our results also suggest that receivers may be at greater risk of predation when communicating than signallers, as receivers must visit risky patches of scent to perform their half of the communication equation, while signallers need not.
format Text
id pubmed-2948037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29480372010-10-06 Predators Are Attracted to the Olfactory Signals of Prey Hughes, Nelika K. Price, Catherine J. Banks, Peter B. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Predator attraction to prey social signals can force prey to trade-off the social imperatives to communicate against the profound effect of predation on their future fitness. These tradeoffs underlie theories on the design and evolution of conspecific signalling systems and have received much attention in visual and acoustic signalling modes. Yet while most territorial mammals communicate using olfactory signals and olfactory hunting is widespread in predators, evidence for the attraction of predators to prey olfactory signals under field conditions is lacking. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To redress this fundamental issue, we examined the attraction of free-roaming predators to discrete patches of scents collected from groups of two and six adult, male house mice, Mus domesticus, which primarily communicate through olfaction. Olfactorily-hunting predators were rapidly attracted to mouse scent signals, visiting mouse scented locations sooner, and in greater number, than control locations. There were no effects of signal concentration on predator attraction to their prey's signals. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This implies that communication will be costly if conspecific receivers and eavesdropping predators are simultaneously attracted to a signal. Significantly, our results also suggest that receivers may be at greater risk of predation when communicating than signallers, as receivers must visit risky patches of scent to perform their half of the communication equation, while signallers need not. Public Library of Science 2010-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC2948037/ /pubmed/20927352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013114 Text en Hughes et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hughes, Nelika K.
Price, Catherine J.
Banks, Peter B.
Predators Are Attracted to the Olfactory Signals of Prey
title Predators Are Attracted to the Olfactory Signals of Prey
title_full Predators Are Attracted to the Olfactory Signals of Prey
title_fullStr Predators Are Attracted to the Olfactory Signals of Prey
title_full_unstemmed Predators Are Attracted to the Olfactory Signals of Prey
title_short Predators Are Attracted to the Olfactory Signals of Prey
title_sort predators are attracted to the olfactory signals of prey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2948037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20927352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013114
work_keys_str_mv AT hughesnelikak predatorsareattractedtotheolfactorysignalsofprey
AT pricecatherinej predatorsareattractedtotheolfactorysignalsofprey
AT bankspeterb predatorsareattractedtotheolfactorysignalsofprey