Cargando…
GPIIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonism Using Small Molecules Provides no Additive Long-Term Protection after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention as Compared to Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin
BACKGROUND: There is some controversy as to whether tirofiban or eptifibatide, two small anti-aggregating drugs (AAD), may reduce the incidence of composite ischemic events within one year in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the real clinical world. METHODS: We compare...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Open
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2948151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20922049 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874192401004010151 |
_version_ | 1782187423982157824 |
---|---|
author | Schiariti, Michele Saladini, Angela Papalia, Francesco Grillo, Placido Nesta, Cristina Cuturello, Domenico Missiroli, Bindo Puddu, Paolo Emilio |
author_facet | Schiariti, Michele Saladini, Angela Papalia, Francesco Grillo, Placido Nesta, Cristina Cuturello, Domenico Missiroli, Bindo Puddu, Paolo Emilio |
author_sort | Schiariti, Michele |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is some controversy as to whether tirofiban or eptifibatide, two small anti-aggregating drugs (AAD), may reduce the incidence of composite ischemic events within one year in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the real clinical world. METHODS: We compared consecutive patients on oral double AAD (with clopidogrel and aspirin) who underwent PCI (n=207) and patients who were on single AAD and received a second AAD, just prior to PCI, and either high-dose tirofiban or double-bolus eptifibatide (double AAD plus small molecules group, n=666). The primary end point (incidence of composite ischemic events within one year) included death, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stent thrombosis or repeat PCI or coronary bypass surgery (related to the target vessel PCI failure) and was modelled by Cox’s regression. RESULTS: There were 89 composite ischemic events: 24 (11.6%) in double AAD alone and 65 (9.8%) in double AAD plus small molecules groups (log-rank test: p=0.36). Incidences by type of ischemic events were similar between the 2 groups. Based on 21 potential covariates fitted simultaneously, adjusted hazard ratios (HR and 95% confidence intervals) showed that age (HR 1.03, 1.01-1.06, p=0.01), diabetes (HR 1.68, 1.01-2.79, p=0.05) and intra aortic balloon pump (HR 5.12, 2.36-11.10, p=0.0001) were significant risk factors whereas thrombolysis by tenecteplase (HR 0.35, 0.13-0.98, p=0.05) and having had hypertension or anti-hypertensive treatment (HR 0.58, 0.36-0.93, p=0.03) were significant protectors for events. Whether small molecules were present provided a non significant additional benefit as compared to double AAD alone (HR 0.83, 0.51-1.36, p=0.46). Pre-PCI CK-MB were not useful to predict events (HR 1.01, 0.99-1.01, p=0.17). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical world patients undergoing PCI (rescue plus primary <13%) while on double AAD, based on clopidogrel plus aspirin, small molecules (tirofiban or eptifibatide) provided no additive long-term protection against the occurrence of composite ischemic events whereas thrombolysis by tenecteplase did. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2948151 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Bentham Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29481512010-10-04 GPIIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonism Using Small Molecules Provides no Additive Long-Term Protection after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention as Compared to Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin Schiariti, Michele Saladini, Angela Papalia, Francesco Grillo, Placido Nesta, Cristina Cuturello, Domenico Missiroli, Bindo Puddu, Paolo Emilio Open Cardiovasc Med J Article BACKGROUND: There is some controversy as to whether tirofiban or eptifibatide, two small anti-aggregating drugs (AAD), may reduce the incidence of composite ischemic events within one year in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the real clinical world. METHODS: We compared consecutive patients on oral double AAD (with clopidogrel and aspirin) who underwent PCI (n=207) and patients who were on single AAD and received a second AAD, just prior to PCI, and either high-dose tirofiban or double-bolus eptifibatide (double AAD plus small molecules group, n=666). The primary end point (incidence of composite ischemic events within one year) included death, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stent thrombosis or repeat PCI or coronary bypass surgery (related to the target vessel PCI failure) and was modelled by Cox’s regression. RESULTS: There were 89 composite ischemic events: 24 (11.6%) in double AAD alone and 65 (9.8%) in double AAD plus small molecules groups (log-rank test: p=0.36). Incidences by type of ischemic events were similar between the 2 groups. Based on 21 potential covariates fitted simultaneously, adjusted hazard ratios (HR and 95% confidence intervals) showed that age (HR 1.03, 1.01-1.06, p=0.01), diabetes (HR 1.68, 1.01-2.79, p=0.05) and intra aortic balloon pump (HR 5.12, 2.36-11.10, p=0.0001) were significant risk factors whereas thrombolysis by tenecteplase (HR 0.35, 0.13-0.98, p=0.05) and having had hypertension or anti-hypertensive treatment (HR 0.58, 0.36-0.93, p=0.03) were significant protectors for events. Whether small molecules were present provided a non significant additional benefit as compared to double AAD alone (HR 0.83, 0.51-1.36, p=0.46). Pre-PCI CK-MB were not useful to predict events (HR 1.01, 0.99-1.01, p=0.17). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical world patients undergoing PCI (rescue plus primary <13%) while on double AAD, based on clopidogrel plus aspirin, small molecules (tirofiban or eptifibatide) provided no additive long-term protection against the occurrence of composite ischemic events whereas thrombolysis by tenecteplase did. Bentham Open 2010-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2948151/ /pubmed/20922049 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874192401004010151 Text en © Schiariti et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Schiariti, Michele Saladini, Angela Papalia, Francesco Grillo, Placido Nesta, Cristina Cuturello, Domenico Missiroli, Bindo Puddu, Paolo Emilio GPIIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonism Using Small Molecules Provides no Additive Long-Term Protection after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention as Compared to Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin |
title | GPIIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonism Using Small Molecules Provides no Additive Long-Term Protection after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention as Compared to Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin |
title_full | GPIIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonism Using Small Molecules Provides no Additive Long-Term Protection after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention as Compared to Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin |
title_fullStr | GPIIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonism Using Small Molecules Provides no Additive Long-Term Protection after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention as Compared to Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin |
title_full_unstemmed | GPIIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonism Using Small Molecules Provides no Additive Long-Term Protection after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention as Compared to Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin |
title_short | GPIIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonism Using Small Molecules Provides no Additive Long-Term Protection after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention as Compared to Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin |
title_sort | gpiib/iiia receptor antagonism using small molecules provides no additive long-term protection after percutaneous coronary intervention as compared to clopidogrel plus aspirin |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2948151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20922049 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874192401004010151 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schiaritimichele gpiibiiiareceptorantagonismusingsmallmoleculesprovidesnoadditivelongtermprotectionafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionascomparedtoclopidogrelplusaspirin AT saladiniangela gpiibiiiareceptorantagonismusingsmallmoleculesprovidesnoadditivelongtermprotectionafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionascomparedtoclopidogrelplusaspirin AT papaliafrancesco gpiibiiiareceptorantagonismusingsmallmoleculesprovidesnoadditivelongtermprotectionafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionascomparedtoclopidogrelplusaspirin AT grilloplacido gpiibiiiareceptorantagonismusingsmallmoleculesprovidesnoadditivelongtermprotectionafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionascomparedtoclopidogrelplusaspirin AT nestacristina gpiibiiiareceptorantagonismusingsmallmoleculesprovidesnoadditivelongtermprotectionafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionascomparedtoclopidogrelplusaspirin AT cuturellodomenico gpiibiiiareceptorantagonismusingsmallmoleculesprovidesnoadditivelongtermprotectionafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionascomparedtoclopidogrelplusaspirin AT missirolibindo gpiibiiiareceptorantagonismusingsmallmoleculesprovidesnoadditivelongtermprotectionafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionascomparedtoclopidogrelplusaspirin AT puddupaoloemilio gpiibiiiareceptorantagonismusingsmallmoleculesprovidesnoadditivelongtermprotectionafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionascomparedtoclopidogrelplusaspirin |