Cargando…

Collaborative working within UK NHS secondary care and across sectors for COPD and the impact of peer review: qualitative findings from the UK National COPD Resources and Outcomes Project

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the effects on collaborative work within the UK National Health Service (NHS) of an intervention for service quality improvement: informal, structured, reciprocated, multidisciplinary peer review with feedback and action plans. The setting was care for chronic obstructi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rivas, Carol, Abbott, Stephen, Taylor, Stephanie J.C, Clarke, Aileen, Roberts, C. Michael, Stone, Robert, Griffiths, Chris
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2948684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20922063
_version_ 1782187484983066624
author Rivas, Carol
Abbott, Stephen
Taylor, Stephanie J.C
Clarke, Aileen
Roberts, C. Michael
Stone, Robert
Griffiths, Chris
author_facet Rivas, Carol
Abbott, Stephen
Taylor, Stephanie J.C
Clarke, Aileen
Roberts, C. Michael
Stone, Robert
Griffiths, Chris
author_sort Rivas, Carol
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We investigated the effects on collaborative work within the UK National Health Service (NHS) of an intervention for service quality improvement: informal, structured, reciprocated, multidisciplinary peer review with feedback and action plans. The setting was care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). THEORY AND METHODS: We analysed semi-structured interviews with 43 hospital respiratory consultants, nurses and general managers at 24 intervention and 11 control sites, as part of a UK randomised controlled study, the National COPD Resources and Outcomes Project (NCROP), using Scott's conceptual framework for action (inter-organisational, intra-organisational, inter-professional and inter-individual). Three areas of care targeted by NCROP involved collaboration across primary and secondary care. RESULTS: Hospital respiratory department collaborations with commissioners and hospital managers varied. Analysis suggested that this is related to team responses to barriers. Clinicians in unsuccessful collaborations told ‘atrocity stories’ of organisational, structural and professional barriers to service improvement. The others removed barriers by working with government and commissioner agendas to ensure continued involvement in patients' care. Multidisciplinary peer review facilitated collaboration between participants, enabling them to meet, reconcile differences and exchange ideas across boundaries. CONCLUSIONS: The data come from the first randomised controlled trial of organisational peer review, adding to research into UK health service collaborative work, which has had a more restricted focus on inter-professional relations. NCROP peer review may only modestly improve collaboration but these data suggest it might be more effective than top-down exhortations to change when collaboration both across and within organisations is required.
format Text
id pubmed-2948684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29486842010-10-04 Collaborative working within UK NHS secondary care and across sectors for COPD and the impact of peer review: qualitative findings from the UK National COPD Resources and Outcomes Project Rivas, Carol Abbott, Stephen Taylor, Stephanie J.C Clarke, Aileen Roberts, C. Michael Stone, Robert Griffiths, Chris Int J Integr Care Research and Theory INTRODUCTION: We investigated the effects on collaborative work within the UK National Health Service (NHS) of an intervention for service quality improvement: informal, structured, reciprocated, multidisciplinary peer review with feedback and action plans. The setting was care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). THEORY AND METHODS: We analysed semi-structured interviews with 43 hospital respiratory consultants, nurses and general managers at 24 intervention and 11 control sites, as part of a UK randomised controlled study, the National COPD Resources and Outcomes Project (NCROP), using Scott's conceptual framework for action (inter-organisational, intra-organisational, inter-professional and inter-individual). Three areas of care targeted by NCROP involved collaboration across primary and secondary care. RESULTS: Hospital respiratory department collaborations with commissioners and hospital managers varied. Analysis suggested that this is related to team responses to barriers. Clinicians in unsuccessful collaborations told ‘atrocity stories’ of organisational, structural and professional barriers to service improvement. The others removed barriers by working with government and commissioner agendas to ensure continued involvement in patients' care. Multidisciplinary peer review facilitated collaboration between participants, enabling them to meet, reconcile differences and exchange ideas across boundaries. CONCLUSIONS: The data come from the first randomised controlled trial of organisational peer review, adding to research into UK health service collaborative work, which has had a more restricted focus on inter-professional relations. NCROP peer review may only modestly improve collaboration but these data suggest it might be more effective than top-down exhortations to change when collaboration both across and within organisations is required. Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving 2010-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2948684/ /pubmed/20922063 Text en Copyright 2010, International Journal of Integrated Care (IJIC)
spellingShingle Research and Theory
Rivas, Carol
Abbott, Stephen
Taylor, Stephanie J.C
Clarke, Aileen
Roberts, C. Michael
Stone, Robert
Griffiths, Chris
Collaborative working within UK NHS secondary care and across sectors for COPD and the impact of peer review: qualitative findings from the UK National COPD Resources and Outcomes Project
title Collaborative working within UK NHS secondary care and across sectors for COPD and the impact of peer review: qualitative findings from the UK National COPD Resources and Outcomes Project
title_full Collaborative working within UK NHS secondary care and across sectors for COPD and the impact of peer review: qualitative findings from the UK National COPD Resources and Outcomes Project
title_fullStr Collaborative working within UK NHS secondary care and across sectors for COPD and the impact of peer review: qualitative findings from the UK National COPD Resources and Outcomes Project
title_full_unstemmed Collaborative working within UK NHS secondary care and across sectors for COPD and the impact of peer review: qualitative findings from the UK National COPD Resources and Outcomes Project
title_short Collaborative working within UK NHS secondary care and across sectors for COPD and the impact of peer review: qualitative findings from the UK National COPD Resources and Outcomes Project
title_sort collaborative working within uk nhs secondary care and across sectors for copd and the impact of peer review: qualitative findings from the uk national copd resources and outcomes project
topic Research and Theory
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2948684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20922063
work_keys_str_mv AT rivascarol collaborativeworkingwithinuknhssecondarycareandacrosssectorsforcopdandtheimpactofpeerreviewqualitativefindingsfromtheuknationalcopdresourcesandoutcomesproject
AT abbottstephen collaborativeworkingwithinuknhssecondarycareandacrosssectorsforcopdandtheimpactofpeerreviewqualitativefindingsfromtheuknationalcopdresourcesandoutcomesproject
AT taylorstephaniejc collaborativeworkingwithinuknhssecondarycareandacrosssectorsforcopdandtheimpactofpeerreviewqualitativefindingsfromtheuknationalcopdresourcesandoutcomesproject
AT clarkeaileen collaborativeworkingwithinuknhssecondarycareandacrosssectorsforcopdandtheimpactofpeerreviewqualitativefindingsfromtheuknationalcopdresourcesandoutcomesproject
AT robertscmichael collaborativeworkingwithinuknhssecondarycareandacrosssectorsforcopdandtheimpactofpeerreviewqualitativefindingsfromtheuknationalcopdresourcesandoutcomesproject
AT stonerobert collaborativeworkingwithinuknhssecondarycareandacrosssectorsforcopdandtheimpactofpeerreviewqualitativefindingsfromtheuknationalcopdresourcesandoutcomesproject
AT griffithschris collaborativeworkingwithinuknhssecondarycareandacrosssectorsforcopdandtheimpactofpeerreviewqualitativefindingsfromtheuknationalcopdresourcesandoutcomesproject