Cargando…
Quality Assessment of Colonoscopy Reporting: Results from a Statewide Cancer Screening Program
This paper aimed to assess quality of colonoscopy reports and determine if physicians in practice were already documenting recommended quality indicators, prior to the publication of a standardized Colonoscopy Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) in 2007. We examined 110 colonoscopy reports from 2005...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2948883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20936146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/419796 |
_version_ | 1782187500009160704 |
---|---|
author | Li, Jun Nadel, Marion R. Poppell, Carolyn F. Dwyer, Diane M. Lieberman, David A. Steinberger, Eileen K. |
author_facet | Li, Jun Nadel, Marion R. Poppell, Carolyn F. Dwyer, Diane M. Lieberman, David A. Steinberger, Eileen K. |
author_sort | Li, Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper aimed to assess quality of colonoscopy reports and determine if physicians in practice were already documenting recommended quality indicators, prior to the publication of a standardized Colonoscopy Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) in 2007. We examined 110 colonoscopy reports from 2005-2006 through Maryland Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. We evaluated 25 key data elements recommended by CO-RADS, including procedure indications, risk/comorbidity assessments, procedure technical descriptions, colonoscopy findings, specimen retrieval/pathology. Among 110 reports, 73% documented the bowel preparation quality and 82% documented specific cecal landmarks. For the 177 individual polyps identified, information on size and morphology was documented for 87% and 53%, respectively. Colonoscopy reporting varied considerately in the pre-CO-RADS period. The absence of key data elements may impact the ability to make recommendations for recall intervals. This paper provides baseline data to assess if CO-RADS has an impact on reporting and how best to improve the quality of reporting. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2948883 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29488832010-10-08 Quality Assessment of Colonoscopy Reporting: Results from a Statewide Cancer Screening Program Li, Jun Nadel, Marion R. Poppell, Carolyn F. Dwyer, Diane M. Lieberman, David A. Steinberger, Eileen K. Diagn Ther Endosc Research Article This paper aimed to assess quality of colonoscopy reports and determine if physicians in practice were already documenting recommended quality indicators, prior to the publication of a standardized Colonoscopy Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) in 2007. We examined 110 colonoscopy reports from 2005-2006 through Maryland Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. We evaluated 25 key data elements recommended by CO-RADS, including procedure indications, risk/comorbidity assessments, procedure technical descriptions, colonoscopy findings, specimen retrieval/pathology. Among 110 reports, 73% documented the bowel preparation quality and 82% documented specific cecal landmarks. For the 177 individual polyps identified, information on size and morphology was documented for 87% and 53%, respectively. Colonoscopy reporting varied considerately in the pre-CO-RADS period. The absence of key data elements may impact the ability to make recommendations for recall intervals. This paper provides baseline data to assess if CO-RADS has an impact on reporting and how best to improve the quality of reporting. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010 2010-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2948883/ /pubmed/20936146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/419796 Text en Copyright © 2010 Jun Li et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Jun Nadel, Marion R. Poppell, Carolyn F. Dwyer, Diane M. Lieberman, David A. Steinberger, Eileen K. Quality Assessment of Colonoscopy Reporting: Results from a Statewide Cancer Screening Program |
title | Quality Assessment of Colonoscopy Reporting: Results from a Statewide Cancer Screening Program |
title_full | Quality Assessment of Colonoscopy Reporting: Results from a Statewide Cancer Screening Program |
title_fullStr | Quality Assessment of Colonoscopy Reporting: Results from a Statewide Cancer Screening Program |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality Assessment of Colonoscopy Reporting: Results from a Statewide Cancer Screening Program |
title_short | Quality Assessment of Colonoscopy Reporting: Results from a Statewide Cancer Screening Program |
title_sort | quality assessment of colonoscopy reporting: results from a statewide cancer screening program |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2948883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20936146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/419796 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lijun qualityassessmentofcolonoscopyreportingresultsfromastatewidecancerscreeningprogram AT nadelmarionr qualityassessmentofcolonoscopyreportingresultsfromastatewidecancerscreeningprogram AT poppellcarolynf qualityassessmentofcolonoscopyreportingresultsfromastatewidecancerscreeningprogram AT dwyerdianem qualityassessmentofcolonoscopyreportingresultsfromastatewidecancerscreeningprogram AT liebermandavida qualityassessmentofcolonoscopyreportingresultsfromastatewidecancerscreeningprogram AT steinbergereileenk qualityassessmentofcolonoscopyreportingresultsfromastatewidecancerscreeningprogram |