Cargando…

Quality Assessment of Colonoscopy Reporting: Results from a Statewide Cancer Screening Program

This paper aimed to assess quality of colonoscopy reports and determine if physicians in practice were already documenting recommended quality indicators, prior to the publication of a standardized Colonoscopy Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) in 2007. We examined 110 colonoscopy reports from 2005...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jun, Nadel, Marion R., Poppell, Carolyn F., Dwyer, Diane M., Lieberman, David A., Steinberger, Eileen K.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2948883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20936146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/419796
_version_ 1782187500009160704
author Li, Jun
Nadel, Marion R.
Poppell, Carolyn F.
Dwyer, Diane M.
Lieberman, David A.
Steinberger, Eileen K.
author_facet Li, Jun
Nadel, Marion R.
Poppell, Carolyn F.
Dwyer, Diane M.
Lieberman, David A.
Steinberger, Eileen K.
author_sort Li, Jun
collection PubMed
description This paper aimed to assess quality of colonoscopy reports and determine if physicians in practice were already documenting recommended quality indicators, prior to the publication of a standardized Colonoscopy Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) in 2007. We examined 110 colonoscopy reports from 2005-2006 through Maryland Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. We evaluated 25 key data elements recommended by CO-RADS, including procedure indications, risk/comorbidity assessments, procedure technical descriptions, colonoscopy findings, specimen retrieval/pathology. Among 110 reports, 73% documented the bowel preparation quality and 82% documented specific cecal landmarks. For the 177 individual polyps identified, information on size and morphology was documented for 87% and 53%, respectively. Colonoscopy reporting varied considerately in the pre-CO-RADS period. The absence of key data elements may impact the ability to make recommendations for recall intervals. This paper provides baseline data to assess if CO-RADS has an impact on reporting and how best to improve the quality of reporting.
format Text
id pubmed-2948883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29488832010-10-08 Quality Assessment of Colonoscopy Reporting: Results from a Statewide Cancer Screening Program Li, Jun Nadel, Marion R. Poppell, Carolyn F. Dwyer, Diane M. Lieberman, David A. Steinberger, Eileen K. Diagn Ther Endosc Research Article This paper aimed to assess quality of colonoscopy reports and determine if physicians in practice were already documenting recommended quality indicators, prior to the publication of a standardized Colonoscopy Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) in 2007. We examined 110 colonoscopy reports from 2005-2006 through Maryland Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. We evaluated 25 key data elements recommended by CO-RADS, including procedure indications, risk/comorbidity assessments, procedure technical descriptions, colonoscopy findings, specimen retrieval/pathology. Among 110 reports, 73% documented the bowel preparation quality and 82% documented specific cecal landmarks. For the 177 individual polyps identified, information on size and morphology was documented for 87% and 53%, respectively. Colonoscopy reporting varied considerately in the pre-CO-RADS period. The absence of key data elements may impact the ability to make recommendations for recall intervals. This paper provides baseline data to assess if CO-RADS has an impact on reporting and how best to improve the quality of reporting. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010 2010-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2948883/ /pubmed/20936146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/419796 Text en Copyright © 2010 Jun Li et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Jun
Nadel, Marion R.
Poppell, Carolyn F.
Dwyer, Diane M.
Lieberman, David A.
Steinberger, Eileen K.
Quality Assessment of Colonoscopy Reporting: Results from a Statewide Cancer Screening Program
title Quality Assessment of Colonoscopy Reporting: Results from a Statewide Cancer Screening Program
title_full Quality Assessment of Colonoscopy Reporting: Results from a Statewide Cancer Screening Program
title_fullStr Quality Assessment of Colonoscopy Reporting: Results from a Statewide Cancer Screening Program
title_full_unstemmed Quality Assessment of Colonoscopy Reporting: Results from a Statewide Cancer Screening Program
title_short Quality Assessment of Colonoscopy Reporting: Results from a Statewide Cancer Screening Program
title_sort quality assessment of colonoscopy reporting: results from a statewide cancer screening program
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2948883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20936146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/419796
work_keys_str_mv AT lijun qualityassessmentofcolonoscopyreportingresultsfromastatewidecancerscreeningprogram
AT nadelmarionr qualityassessmentofcolonoscopyreportingresultsfromastatewidecancerscreeningprogram
AT poppellcarolynf qualityassessmentofcolonoscopyreportingresultsfromastatewidecancerscreeningprogram
AT dwyerdianem qualityassessmentofcolonoscopyreportingresultsfromastatewidecancerscreeningprogram
AT liebermandavida qualityassessmentofcolonoscopyreportingresultsfromastatewidecancerscreeningprogram
AT steinbergereileenk qualityassessmentofcolonoscopyreportingresultsfromastatewidecancerscreeningprogram