Cargando…
Dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer
Implanted gold fiducial markers are widely used in radiation therapy to improve targeting accuracy. Recent investigations have revealed that metallic fiducial markers can cause severe perturbations in dose distributions for proton therapy, suggesting smaller markers should be considered. The objecti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2949274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19223836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2875 |
_version_ | 1782187517111435264 |
---|---|
author | Giebeler, Annelise Fontenot, Jonas Balter, Peter Ciangaru, George Zhu, Ronald Newhauser, Wayne |
author_facet | Giebeler, Annelise Fontenot, Jonas Balter, Peter Ciangaru, George Zhu, Ronald Newhauser, Wayne |
author_sort | Giebeler, Annelise |
collection | PubMed |
description | Implanted gold fiducial markers are widely used in radiation therapy to improve targeting accuracy. Recent investigations have revealed that metallic fiducial markers can cause severe perturbations in dose distributions for proton therapy, suggesting smaller markers should be considered. The objective of this study was to estimate the dosimetric impact of small gold markers in patients receiving proton therapy for prostate cancer. Small, medium, and large helical wire markers with lengths of 10 mm and helix diameters of 0.35 mm, 0.75 mm, and 1.15 mm, respectively, were implanted in an anthropomorphic phantom. Radiographic visibility was confirmed using a kilovoltage x‐ray imaging system, and dose perturbations were predicted from Monte Carlo simulations and confirmed by measurements. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that size of dose perturbation depended on marker size, orientation, and distance from the beam's end of range. Specifically, the perturbation of proton dose for the lateral‐opposed‐pair treatment technique was 31% for large markers and 23% for medium markers in a typical oblique orientation. Results for perpendicular and parallel orientations were respectively lower and higher. Consequently, these markers are not well suited for use in patients receiving proton therapy for prostate cancer. Dose perturbation was not observed for the small markers, but these markers were deemed too fragile for transrectal implantation in the prostate. PACS number: 87.53.Pb |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2949274 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29492742018-04-02 Dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer Giebeler, Annelise Fontenot, Jonas Balter, Peter Ciangaru, George Zhu, Ronald Newhauser, Wayne J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Implanted gold fiducial markers are widely used in radiation therapy to improve targeting accuracy. Recent investigations have revealed that metallic fiducial markers can cause severe perturbations in dose distributions for proton therapy, suggesting smaller markers should be considered. The objective of this study was to estimate the dosimetric impact of small gold markers in patients receiving proton therapy for prostate cancer. Small, medium, and large helical wire markers with lengths of 10 mm and helix diameters of 0.35 mm, 0.75 mm, and 1.15 mm, respectively, were implanted in an anthropomorphic phantom. Radiographic visibility was confirmed using a kilovoltage x‐ray imaging system, and dose perturbations were predicted from Monte Carlo simulations and confirmed by measurements. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that size of dose perturbation depended on marker size, orientation, and distance from the beam's end of range. Specifically, the perturbation of proton dose for the lateral‐opposed‐pair treatment technique was 31% for large markers and 23% for medium markers in a typical oblique orientation. Results for perpendicular and parallel orientations were respectively lower and higher. Consequently, these markers are not well suited for use in patients receiving proton therapy for prostate cancer. Dose perturbation was not observed for the small markers, but these markers were deemed too fragile for transrectal implantation in the prostate. PACS number: 87.53.Pb John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2009-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2949274/ /pubmed/19223836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2875 Text en © 2009 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Giebeler, Annelise Fontenot, Jonas Balter, Peter Ciangaru, George Zhu, Ronald Newhauser, Wayne Dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer |
title | Dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer |
title_full | Dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer |
title_short | Dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer |
title_sort | dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2949274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19223836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2875 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giebelerannelise doseperturbationsfromimplantedhelicalgoldmarkersinprotontherapyofprostatecancer AT fontenotjonas doseperturbationsfromimplantedhelicalgoldmarkersinprotontherapyofprostatecancer AT balterpeter doseperturbationsfromimplantedhelicalgoldmarkersinprotontherapyofprostatecancer AT ciangarugeorge doseperturbationsfromimplantedhelicalgoldmarkersinprotontherapyofprostatecancer AT zhuronald doseperturbationsfromimplantedhelicalgoldmarkersinprotontherapyofprostatecancer AT newhauserwayne doseperturbationsfromimplantedhelicalgoldmarkersinprotontherapyofprostatecancer |