Cargando…

Dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer

Implanted gold fiducial markers are widely used in radiation therapy to improve targeting accuracy. Recent investigations have revealed that metallic fiducial markers can cause severe perturbations in dose distributions for proton therapy, suggesting smaller markers should be considered. The objecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giebeler, Annelise, Fontenot, Jonas, Balter, Peter, Ciangaru, George, Zhu, Ronald, Newhauser, Wayne
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2949274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19223836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2875
_version_ 1782187517111435264
author Giebeler, Annelise
Fontenot, Jonas
Balter, Peter
Ciangaru, George
Zhu, Ronald
Newhauser, Wayne
author_facet Giebeler, Annelise
Fontenot, Jonas
Balter, Peter
Ciangaru, George
Zhu, Ronald
Newhauser, Wayne
author_sort Giebeler, Annelise
collection PubMed
description Implanted gold fiducial markers are widely used in radiation therapy to improve targeting accuracy. Recent investigations have revealed that metallic fiducial markers can cause severe perturbations in dose distributions for proton therapy, suggesting smaller markers should be considered. The objective of this study was to estimate the dosimetric impact of small gold markers in patients receiving proton therapy for prostate cancer. Small, medium, and large helical wire markers with lengths of 10 mm and helix diameters of 0.35 mm, 0.75 mm, and 1.15 mm, respectively, were implanted in an anthropomorphic phantom. Radiographic visibility was confirmed using a kilovoltage x‐ray imaging system, and dose perturbations were predicted from Monte Carlo simulations and confirmed by measurements. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that size of dose perturbation depended on marker size, orientation, and distance from the beam's end of range. Specifically, the perturbation of proton dose for the lateral‐opposed‐pair treatment technique was 31% for large markers and 23% for medium markers in a typical oblique orientation. Results for perpendicular and parallel orientations were respectively lower and higher. Consequently, these markers are not well suited for use in patients receiving proton therapy for prostate cancer. Dose perturbation was not observed for the small markers, but these markers were deemed too fragile for transrectal implantation in the prostate. PACS number: 87.53.Pb
format Text
id pubmed-2949274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29492742018-04-02 Dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer Giebeler, Annelise Fontenot, Jonas Balter, Peter Ciangaru, George Zhu, Ronald Newhauser, Wayne J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Implanted gold fiducial markers are widely used in radiation therapy to improve targeting accuracy. Recent investigations have revealed that metallic fiducial markers can cause severe perturbations in dose distributions for proton therapy, suggesting smaller markers should be considered. The objective of this study was to estimate the dosimetric impact of small gold markers in patients receiving proton therapy for prostate cancer. Small, medium, and large helical wire markers with lengths of 10 mm and helix diameters of 0.35 mm, 0.75 mm, and 1.15 mm, respectively, were implanted in an anthropomorphic phantom. Radiographic visibility was confirmed using a kilovoltage x‐ray imaging system, and dose perturbations were predicted from Monte Carlo simulations and confirmed by measurements. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that size of dose perturbation depended on marker size, orientation, and distance from the beam's end of range. Specifically, the perturbation of proton dose for the lateral‐opposed‐pair treatment technique was 31% for large markers and 23% for medium markers in a typical oblique orientation. Results for perpendicular and parallel orientations were respectively lower and higher. Consequently, these markers are not well suited for use in patients receiving proton therapy for prostate cancer. Dose perturbation was not observed for the small markers, but these markers were deemed too fragile for transrectal implantation in the prostate. PACS number: 87.53.Pb John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2009-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2949274/ /pubmed/19223836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2875 Text en © 2009 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Giebeler, Annelise
Fontenot, Jonas
Balter, Peter
Ciangaru, George
Zhu, Ronald
Newhauser, Wayne
Dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer
title Dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer
title_full Dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer
title_fullStr Dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer
title_short Dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer
title_sort dose perturbations from implanted helical gold markers in proton therapy of prostate cancer
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2949274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19223836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i1.2875
work_keys_str_mv AT giebelerannelise doseperturbationsfromimplantedhelicalgoldmarkersinprotontherapyofprostatecancer
AT fontenotjonas doseperturbationsfromimplantedhelicalgoldmarkersinprotontherapyofprostatecancer
AT balterpeter doseperturbationsfromimplantedhelicalgoldmarkersinprotontherapyofprostatecancer
AT ciangarugeorge doseperturbationsfromimplantedhelicalgoldmarkersinprotontherapyofprostatecancer
AT zhuronald doseperturbationsfromimplantedhelicalgoldmarkersinprotontherapyofprostatecancer
AT newhauserwayne doseperturbationsfromimplantedhelicalgoldmarkersinprotontherapyofprostatecancer