Cargando…

Formative evaluation of a telemedicine model for delivering clinical neurophysiology services part I: Utility, technical performance and service provider perspective

BACKGROUND: Formative evaluation is conducted in the early stages of system implementation to assess how it works in practice and to identify opportunities for improving technical and process performance. A formative evaluation of a teleneurophysiology service was conducted to examine its technical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Breen, Patricia, Murphy, Kevin, Browne, Geraldine, Molloy, Fiona, Reid, Valerie, Doherty, Colin, Delanty, Norman, Connolly, Sean, Fitzsimons, Mary
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2949692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20843309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-10-48
_version_ 1782187552814399488
author Breen, Patricia
Murphy, Kevin
Browne, Geraldine
Molloy, Fiona
Reid, Valerie
Doherty, Colin
Delanty, Norman
Connolly, Sean
Fitzsimons, Mary
author_facet Breen, Patricia
Murphy, Kevin
Browne, Geraldine
Molloy, Fiona
Reid, Valerie
Doherty, Colin
Delanty, Norman
Connolly, Sean
Fitzsimons, Mary
author_sort Breen, Patricia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Formative evaluation is conducted in the early stages of system implementation to assess how it works in practice and to identify opportunities for improving technical and process performance. A formative evaluation of a teleneurophysiology service was conducted to examine its technical and sociological dimensions. METHODS: A teleneurophysiology service providing routine EEG investigation was established. Service use, technical performance and satisfaction of clinical neurophysiology personnel were assessed qualitatively and quantitatively. These were contrasted with a previously reported analysis of the need for teleneurophysiology, and examination of expectation and satisfaction with clinical neurophysiology services in Ireland. A preliminary cost-benefit analysis was also conducted. RESULTS: Over the course of 40 clinical sessions during 20 weeks, 142 EEG investigations were recorded and stored on a file server at a satellite centre which was 130 miles away from the host clinical neurophysiology department. Using a virtual private network, the EEGs were accessed by a consultant neurophysiologist at the host centre for interpretation. The model resulted in a 5-fold increase in access to EEG services as well as reducing average waiting times for investigation by a half. Technically the model worked well, although a temporary loss of virtual private network connectivity highlighted the need for clarity in terms of responsibility for troubleshooting and repair of equipment problems. Referral quality, communication between host and satellite centres, quality of EEG recordings, and ease of EEG review and reporting indicated that appropriate organisational processes were adopted by the service. Compared to traditional CN service delivery, the teleneurophysiology model resulted in a comparable unit cost per EEG. CONCLUSION: Observations suggest that when traditional organisational boundaries are crossed challenges associated with the social dimension of service delivery may be amplified. Teleneurophysiology requires a governance and management that recognises its socio-technical nature.
format Text
id pubmed-2949692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29496922010-10-06 Formative evaluation of a telemedicine model for delivering clinical neurophysiology services part I: Utility, technical performance and service provider perspective Breen, Patricia Murphy, Kevin Browne, Geraldine Molloy, Fiona Reid, Valerie Doherty, Colin Delanty, Norman Connolly, Sean Fitzsimons, Mary BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Formative evaluation is conducted in the early stages of system implementation to assess how it works in practice and to identify opportunities for improving technical and process performance. A formative evaluation of a teleneurophysiology service was conducted to examine its technical and sociological dimensions. METHODS: A teleneurophysiology service providing routine EEG investigation was established. Service use, technical performance and satisfaction of clinical neurophysiology personnel were assessed qualitatively and quantitatively. These were contrasted with a previously reported analysis of the need for teleneurophysiology, and examination of expectation and satisfaction with clinical neurophysiology services in Ireland. A preliminary cost-benefit analysis was also conducted. RESULTS: Over the course of 40 clinical sessions during 20 weeks, 142 EEG investigations were recorded and stored on a file server at a satellite centre which was 130 miles away from the host clinical neurophysiology department. Using a virtual private network, the EEGs were accessed by a consultant neurophysiologist at the host centre for interpretation. The model resulted in a 5-fold increase in access to EEG services as well as reducing average waiting times for investigation by a half. Technically the model worked well, although a temporary loss of virtual private network connectivity highlighted the need for clarity in terms of responsibility for troubleshooting and repair of equipment problems. Referral quality, communication between host and satellite centres, quality of EEG recordings, and ease of EEG review and reporting indicated that appropriate organisational processes were adopted by the service. Compared to traditional CN service delivery, the teleneurophysiology model resulted in a comparable unit cost per EEG. CONCLUSION: Observations suggest that when traditional organisational boundaries are crossed challenges associated with the social dimension of service delivery may be amplified. Teleneurophysiology requires a governance and management that recognises its socio-technical nature. BioMed Central 2010-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2949692/ /pubmed/20843309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-10-48 Text en Copyright ©2010 Breen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Breen, Patricia
Murphy, Kevin
Browne, Geraldine
Molloy, Fiona
Reid, Valerie
Doherty, Colin
Delanty, Norman
Connolly, Sean
Fitzsimons, Mary
Formative evaluation of a telemedicine model for delivering clinical neurophysiology services part I: Utility, technical performance and service provider perspective
title Formative evaluation of a telemedicine model for delivering clinical neurophysiology services part I: Utility, technical performance and service provider perspective
title_full Formative evaluation of a telemedicine model for delivering clinical neurophysiology services part I: Utility, technical performance and service provider perspective
title_fullStr Formative evaluation of a telemedicine model for delivering clinical neurophysiology services part I: Utility, technical performance and service provider perspective
title_full_unstemmed Formative evaluation of a telemedicine model for delivering clinical neurophysiology services part I: Utility, technical performance and service provider perspective
title_short Formative evaluation of a telemedicine model for delivering clinical neurophysiology services part I: Utility, technical performance and service provider perspective
title_sort formative evaluation of a telemedicine model for delivering clinical neurophysiology services part i: utility, technical performance and service provider perspective
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2949692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20843309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-10-48
work_keys_str_mv AT breenpatricia formativeevaluationofatelemedicinemodelfordeliveringclinicalneurophysiologyservicespartiutilitytechnicalperformanceandserviceproviderperspective
AT murphykevin formativeevaluationofatelemedicinemodelfordeliveringclinicalneurophysiologyservicespartiutilitytechnicalperformanceandserviceproviderperspective
AT brownegeraldine formativeevaluationofatelemedicinemodelfordeliveringclinicalneurophysiologyservicespartiutilitytechnicalperformanceandserviceproviderperspective
AT molloyfiona formativeevaluationofatelemedicinemodelfordeliveringclinicalneurophysiologyservicespartiutilitytechnicalperformanceandserviceproviderperspective
AT reidvalerie formativeevaluationofatelemedicinemodelfordeliveringclinicalneurophysiologyservicespartiutilitytechnicalperformanceandserviceproviderperspective
AT dohertycolin formativeevaluationofatelemedicinemodelfordeliveringclinicalneurophysiologyservicespartiutilitytechnicalperformanceandserviceproviderperspective
AT delantynorman formativeevaluationofatelemedicinemodelfordeliveringclinicalneurophysiologyservicespartiutilitytechnicalperformanceandserviceproviderperspective
AT connollysean formativeevaluationofatelemedicinemodelfordeliveringclinicalneurophysiologyservicespartiutilitytechnicalperformanceandserviceproviderperspective
AT fitzsimonsmary formativeevaluationofatelemedicinemodelfordeliveringclinicalneurophysiologyservicespartiutilitytechnicalperformanceandserviceproviderperspective