Cargando…

Risk communication in clinical trials: A cognitive experiment and a survey

BACKGROUND: A Royal Statistical Society Working Party recently recommended that "Greater use should be made of numerical, as opposed to verbal, descriptions of risk" in first-in-man clinical trials. This echoed the view of many clinicians and psychologists about risk communication. As the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheung, Yin Bun, Wee, Hwee Lin, Thumboo, Julian, Goh, Cynthia, Pietrobon, Ricardo, Toh, Han Chong, Yong, Yu Fen, Tan, Say Beng
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2949696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20868525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-10-55
_version_ 1782187556189765632
author Cheung, Yin Bun
Wee, Hwee Lin
Thumboo, Julian
Goh, Cynthia
Pietrobon, Ricardo
Toh, Han Chong
Yong, Yu Fen
Tan, Say Beng
author_facet Cheung, Yin Bun
Wee, Hwee Lin
Thumboo, Julian
Goh, Cynthia
Pietrobon, Ricardo
Toh, Han Chong
Yong, Yu Fen
Tan, Say Beng
author_sort Cheung, Yin Bun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A Royal Statistical Society Working Party recently recommended that "Greater use should be made of numerical, as opposed to verbal, descriptions of risk" in first-in-man clinical trials. This echoed the view of many clinicians and psychologists about risk communication. As the clinical trial industry expands rapidly across the globe, it is important to understand risk communication in Asian countries. METHODS: We conducted a cognitive experiment about participation in a hypothetical clinical trial of a pain relief medication and a survey in cancer and arthritis patients in Singapore. In part 1 of the experiment, the patients received information about the risk of side effects in one of three formats (frequency, percentage and verbal descriptor) and in one of two sequences (from least to most severe and from most to least severe), and were asked about their willingness to participate. In part 2, the patients received information about the risk in all three formats, in the same sequence, and were again asked about their willingness to participate. A survey of preference for risk presentation methods and usage of verbal descriptors immediately followed. RESULTS: Willingness to participate and the likelihood of changing one's decision were not affected by the risk presentation methods. Most patients indicated a preference for the frequency format, but patients with primary school or no formal education were indifferent. While the patients used the verbal descriptors "very common", "common" and "very rare" in ways similar to the European Commission's Guidelines, their usage of the descriptors "uncommon" and "rare" was substantially different from the EU's. CONCLUSION: In this sample of Asian cancer and arthritis patients, risk presentation format had no impact on willingness to participate in a clinical trial. However, there is a clear preference for the frequency format. The lay use of verbal descriptors was substantially different from the EU's.
format Text
id pubmed-2949696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29496962010-10-06 Risk communication in clinical trials: A cognitive experiment and a survey Cheung, Yin Bun Wee, Hwee Lin Thumboo, Julian Goh, Cynthia Pietrobon, Ricardo Toh, Han Chong Yong, Yu Fen Tan, Say Beng BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: A Royal Statistical Society Working Party recently recommended that "Greater use should be made of numerical, as opposed to verbal, descriptions of risk" in first-in-man clinical trials. This echoed the view of many clinicians and psychologists about risk communication. As the clinical trial industry expands rapidly across the globe, it is important to understand risk communication in Asian countries. METHODS: We conducted a cognitive experiment about participation in a hypothetical clinical trial of a pain relief medication and a survey in cancer and arthritis patients in Singapore. In part 1 of the experiment, the patients received information about the risk of side effects in one of three formats (frequency, percentage and verbal descriptor) and in one of two sequences (from least to most severe and from most to least severe), and were asked about their willingness to participate. In part 2, the patients received information about the risk in all three formats, in the same sequence, and were again asked about their willingness to participate. A survey of preference for risk presentation methods and usage of verbal descriptors immediately followed. RESULTS: Willingness to participate and the likelihood of changing one's decision were not affected by the risk presentation methods. Most patients indicated a preference for the frequency format, but patients with primary school or no formal education were indifferent. While the patients used the verbal descriptors "very common", "common" and "very rare" in ways similar to the European Commission's Guidelines, their usage of the descriptors "uncommon" and "rare" was substantially different from the EU's. CONCLUSION: In this sample of Asian cancer and arthritis patients, risk presentation format had no impact on willingness to participate in a clinical trial. However, there is a clear preference for the frequency format. The lay use of verbal descriptors was substantially different from the EU's. BioMed Central 2010-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC2949696/ /pubmed/20868525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-10-55 Text en Copyright ©2010 Cheung et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cheung, Yin Bun
Wee, Hwee Lin
Thumboo, Julian
Goh, Cynthia
Pietrobon, Ricardo
Toh, Han Chong
Yong, Yu Fen
Tan, Say Beng
Risk communication in clinical trials: A cognitive experiment and a survey
title Risk communication in clinical trials: A cognitive experiment and a survey
title_full Risk communication in clinical trials: A cognitive experiment and a survey
title_fullStr Risk communication in clinical trials: A cognitive experiment and a survey
title_full_unstemmed Risk communication in clinical trials: A cognitive experiment and a survey
title_short Risk communication in clinical trials: A cognitive experiment and a survey
title_sort risk communication in clinical trials: a cognitive experiment and a survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2949696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20868525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-10-55
work_keys_str_mv AT cheungyinbun riskcommunicationinclinicaltrialsacognitiveexperimentandasurvey
AT weehweelin riskcommunicationinclinicaltrialsacognitiveexperimentandasurvey
AT thumboojulian riskcommunicationinclinicaltrialsacognitiveexperimentandasurvey
AT gohcynthia riskcommunicationinclinicaltrialsacognitiveexperimentandasurvey
AT pietrobonricardo riskcommunicationinclinicaltrialsacognitiveexperimentandasurvey
AT tohhanchong riskcommunicationinclinicaltrialsacognitiveexperimentandasurvey
AT yongyufen riskcommunicationinclinicaltrialsacognitiveexperimentandasurvey
AT tansaybeng riskcommunicationinclinicaltrialsacognitiveexperimentandasurvey