Cargando…

Patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with SCI during robot-aided gait training

BACKGROUND: Manual body weight supported treadmill training and robot-aided treadmill training are frequently used techniques for the gait rehabilitation of individuals after stroke and spinal cord injury. Current evidence suggests that robot-aided gait training may be improved by making robotic beh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duschau-Wicke, Alexander, Caprez, Andrea, Riener, Robert
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2949707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20828422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-7-43
_version_ 1782187560044331008
author Duschau-Wicke, Alexander
Caprez, Andrea
Riener, Robert
author_facet Duschau-Wicke, Alexander
Caprez, Andrea
Riener, Robert
author_sort Duschau-Wicke, Alexander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Manual body weight supported treadmill training and robot-aided treadmill training are frequently used techniques for the gait rehabilitation of individuals after stroke and spinal cord injury. Current evidence suggests that robot-aided gait training may be improved by making robotic behavior more patient-cooperative. In this study, we have investigated the immediate effects of patient-cooperative versus non-cooperative robot-aided gait training on individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). METHODS: Eleven patients with iSCI participated in a single training session with the gait rehabilitation robot Lokomat. The patients were exposed to four different training modes in random order: During both non-cooperative position control and compliant impedance control, fixed timing of movements was provided. During two variants of the patient-cooperative path control approach, free timing of movements was enabled and the robot provided only spatial guidance. The two variants of the path control approach differed in the amount of additional support, which was either individually adjusted or exaggerated. Joint angles and torques of the robot as well as muscle activity and heart rate of the patients were recorded. Kinematic variability, interaction torques, heart rate and muscle activity were compared between the different conditions. RESULTS: Patients showed more spatial and temporal kinematic variability, reduced interaction torques, a higher increase of heart rate and more muscle activity in the patient-cooperative path control mode with individually adjusted support than in the non-cooperative position control mode. In the compliant impedance control mode, spatial kinematic variability was increased and interaction torques were reduced, but temporal kinematic variability, heart rate and muscle activity were not significantly higher than in the position control mode. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-cooperative robot-aided gait training with free timing of movements made individuals with iSCI participate more actively and with larger kinematic variability than non-cooperative, position-controlled robot-aided gait training.
format Text
id pubmed-2949707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29497072010-11-03 Patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with SCI during robot-aided gait training Duschau-Wicke, Alexander Caprez, Andrea Riener, Robert J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Manual body weight supported treadmill training and robot-aided treadmill training are frequently used techniques for the gait rehabilitation of individuals after stroke and spinal cord injury. Current evidence suggests that robot-aided gait training may be improved by making robotic behavior more patient-cooperative. In this study, we have investigated the immediate effects of patient-cooperative versus non-cooperative robot-aided gait training on individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). METHODS: Eleven patients with iSCI participated in a single training session with the gait rehabilitation robot Lokomat. The patients were exposed to four different training modes in random order: During both non-cooperative position control and compliant impedance control, fixed timing of movements was provided. During two variants of the patient-cooperative path control approach, free timing of movements was enabled and the robot provided only spatial guidance. The two variants of the path control approach differed in the amount of additional support, which was either individually adjusted or exaggerated. Joint angles and torques of the robot as well as muscle activity and heart rate of the patients were recorded. Kinematic variability, interaction torques, heart rate and muscle activity were compared between the different conditions. RESULTS: Patients showed more spatial and temporal kinematic variability, reduced interaction torques, a higher increase of heart rate and more muscle activity in the patient-cooperative path control mode with individually adjusted support than in the non-cooperative position control mode. In the compliant impedance control mode, spatial kinematic variability was increased and interaction torques were reduced, but temporal kinematic variability, heart rate and muscle activity were not significantly higher than in the position control mode. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-cooperative robot-aided gait training with free timing of movements made individuals with iSCI participate more actively and with larger kinematic variability than non-cooperative, position-controlled robot-aided gait training. BioMed Central 2010-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2949707/ /pubmed/20828422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-7-43 Text en Copyright ©2010 Duschau-Wicke et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Duschau-Wicke, Alexander
Caprez, Andrea
Riener, Robert
Patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with SCI during robot-aided gait training
title Patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with SCI during robot-aided gait training
title_full Patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with SCI during robot-aided gait training
title_fullStr Patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with SCI during robot-aided gait training
title_full_unstemmed Patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with SCI during robot-aided gait training
title_short Patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with SCI during robot-aided gait training
title_sort patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with sci during robot-aided gait training
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2949707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20828422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-7-43
work_keys_str_mv AT duschauwickealexander patientcooperativecontrolincreasesactiveparticipationofindividualswithsciduringrobotaidedgaittraining
AT caprezandrea patientcooperativecontrolincreasesactiveparticipationofindividualswithsciduringrobotaidedgaittraining
AT rienerrobert patientcooperativecontrolincreasesactiveparticipationofindividualswithsciduringrobotaidedgaittraining