Cargando…

A comparative summary of expression systems for the recombinant production of galactose oxidase

BACKGROUND: The microbes Escherichia coli and Pichia pastoris are convenient prokaryotic and eukaryotic hosts, respectively, for the recombinant production of proteins at laboratory scales. A comparative study was performed to evaluate a range of constructs and process parameters for the heterologou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spadiut, Oliver, Olsson, Lisbeth, Brumer, Harry
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2949794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20836876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-9-68
_version_ 1782187581266460672
author Spadiut, Oliver
Olsson, Lisbeth
Brumer, Harry
author_facet Spadiut, Oliver
Olsson, Lisbeth
Brumer, Harry
author_sort Spadiut, Oliver
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The microbes Escherichia coli and Pichia pastoris are convenient prokaryotic and eukaryotic hosts, respectively, for the recombinant production of proteins at laboratory scales. A comparative study was performed to evaluate a range of constructs and process parameters for the heterologous intra- and extracellular expression of genes encoding the industrially relevant enzyme galactose 6-oxidase (EC 1.1.3.9) from the fungus Fusarium graminearum. In particular, the wild-type galox gene from F. graminearum, an optimized variant for E. coli and a codon-optimized gene for P. pastoris were expressed without the native pro-sequence, but with a His-tag either at the N- or the C-terminus of the enzyme. RESULTS: The intracellular expression of a codon-optimized gene with an N-terminal His(10)-tag in E. coli, using the pET16b(+ )vector and BL21DE3 cells, resulted in a volumetric productivity of 180 U·L(-1)·h(-1). The intracellular expression of the wild-type gene from F. graminearum, using the pPIC3.5 vector and the P. pastoris strain GS115, was poor, resulting in a volumetric productivity of 120 U·L(-1)·h(-1). Furthermore, this system did not tolerate an N-terminal His(10)-tag, thus rendering isolation of the enzyme from the complicated mixture difficult. The highest volumetric productivity (610 U·L(-1)·h(-1)) was achieved when the wild-type gene from F. graminearum was expressed extracellularly in the P. pastoris strain SMD1168H using the pPICZα-system. A C-terminal His(6)-tag did not significantly affect the production of the enzyme, thus enabling simple purification by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography. Notably, codon-optimisation of the galox gene for expression in P. pastoris did not result in a higher product yield (g protein·L(-1 )culture). Effective activation of the enzyme to generate the active-site radical copper complex could be equally well achieved by addition of CuSO(4 )directly in the culture medium or post-harvest. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that intracellular production in E. coli and extracellular production in P. pastoris comprise a complementary pair of systems for the production of GalOx. The prokaryotic host is favored for high-throughput screening, for example in the development of improved enzymes, while the yeast system is ideal for production scale-up for enzyme applications.
format Text
id pubmed-2949794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29497942010-10-06 A comparative summary of expression systems for the recombinant production of galactose oxidase Spadiut, Oliver Olsson, Lisbeth Brumer, Harry Microb Cell Fact Research BACKGROUND: The microbes Escherichia coli and Pichia pastoris are convenient prokaryotic and eukaryotic hosts, respectively, for the recombinant production of proteins at laboratory scales. A comparative study was performed to evaluate a range of constructs and process parameters for the heterologous intra- and extracellular expression of genes encoding the industrially relevant enzyme galactose 6-oxidase (EC 1.1.3.9) from the fungus Fusarium graminearum. In particular, the wild-type galox gene from F. graminearum, an optimized variant for E. coli and a codon-optimized gene for P. pastoris were expressed without the native pro-sequence, but with a His-tag either at the N- or the C-terminus of the enzyme. RESULTS: The intracellular expression of a codon-optimized gene with an N-terminal His(10)-tag in E. coli, using the pET16b(+ )vector and BL21DE3 cells, resulted in a volumetric productivity of 180 U·L(-1)·h(-1). The intracellular expression of the wild-type gene from F. graminearum, using the pPIC3.5 vector and the P. pastoris strain GS115, was poor, resulting in a volumetric productivity of 120 U·L(-1)·h(-1). Furthermore, this system did not tolerate an N-terminal His(10)-tag, thus rendering isolation of the enzyme from the complicated mixture difficult. The highest volumetric productivity (610 U·L(-1)·h(-1)) was achieved when the wild-type gene from F. graminearum was expressed extracellularly in the P. pastoris strain SMD1168H using the pPICZα-system. A C-terminal His(6)-tag did not significantly affect the production of the enzyme, thus enabling simple purification by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography. Notably, codon-optimisation of the galox gene for expression in P. pastoris did not result in a higher product yield (g protein·L(-1 )culture). Effective activation of the enzyme to generate the active-site radical copper complex could be equally well achieved by addition of CuSO(4 )directly in the culture medium or post-harvest. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that intracellular production in E. coli and extracellular production in P. pastoris comprise a complementary pair of systems for the production of GalOx. The prokaryotic host is favored for high-throughput screening, for example in the development of improved enzymes, while the yeast system is ideal for production scale-up for enzyme applications. BioMed Central 2010-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2949794/ /pubmed/20836876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-9-68 Text en Copyright ©2010 Spadiut et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Spadiut, Oliver
Olsson, Lisbeth
Brumer, Harry
A comparative summary of expression systems for the recombinant production of galactose oxidase
title A comparative summary of expression systems for the recombinant production of galactose oxidase
title_full A comparative summary of expression systems for the recombinant production of galactose oxidase
title_fullStr A comparative summary of expression systems for the recombinant production of galactose oxidase
title_full_unstemmed A comparative summary of expression systems for the recombinant production of galactose oxidase
title_short A comparative summary of expression systems for the recombinant production of galactose oxidase
title_sort comparative summary of expression systems for the recombinant production of galactose oxidase
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2949794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20836876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-9-68
work_keys_str_mv AT spadiutoliver acomparativesummaryofexpressionsystemsfortherecombinantproductionofgalactoseoxidase
AT olssonlisbeth acomparativesummaryofexpressionsystemsfortherecombinantproductionofgalactoseoxidase
AT brumerharry acomparativesummaryofexpressionsystemsfortherecombinantproductionofgalactoseoxidase
AT spadiutoliver comparativesummaryofexpressionsystemsfortherecombinantproductionofgalactoseoxidase
AT olssonlisbeth comparativesummaryofexpressionsystemsfortherecombinantproductionofgalactoseoxidase
AT brumerharry comparativesummaryofexpressionsystemsfortherecombinantproductionofgalactoseoxidase