Cargando…
Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test, NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B Antigen, for detection of the 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 viruses
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the clinical accuracy and analytical sensitivity of the NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B antigen kit in detecting 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 viruses. The kit is one of the most popular rapid diagnostic tests for detecting influenza in Republic of Korea. RESULTS: The Nan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2949845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20849665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-7-244 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the clinical accuracy and analytical sensitivity of the NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B antigen kit in detecting 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 viruses. The kit is one of the most popular rapid diagnostic tests for detecting influenza in Republic of Korea. RESULTS: The NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B kit resulted in 79.4% sensitivity and 97.2% specificity compared to RT-PCR in the detection of the viruses from 1,023 specimens. In addition, the kit was able to detect two strains of novel influenza viruses, Influenza A/California/12/2009(H1N1) and clinically isolated wild-type novel influenza A/H1N1, both of which are spreading epidemically throughout the world. In addition, the correlation between NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B test and conventional RT-PCR was approximately 94%, indicating a high concordance rate. Analytical sensitivity of the kit was approximately 73 ± 3.65 ng/mL of the purified viral proteins and 1.13 ± 0.11 hemagglutination units for the cultured virus. CONCLUSIONS: As the NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B kit showed relatively high sensitivity and specificity and the good correlation with RT-PCR, it will be very useful in the early control of influenza infection and in helping physicians in making early treatment decisions. |
---|