Cargando…

Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test, NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B Antigen, for detection of the 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 viruses

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the clinical accuracy and analytical sensitivity of the NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B antigen kit in detecting 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 viruses. The kit is one of the most popular rapid diagnostic tests for detecting influenza in Republic of Korea. RESULTS: The Nan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Gyu-Cheol, Jeon, Eun-Sung, Kim, Won-Shik, Le, Dung Tien, Yoo, Jong-Ha, Chong, Chom-Kyu
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2949845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20849665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-7-244
_version_ 1782187594028679168
author Lee, Gyu-Cheol
Jeon, Eun-Sung
Kim, Won-Shik
Le, Dung Tien
Yoo, Jong-Ha
Chong, Chom-Kyu
author_facet Lee, Gyu-Cheol
Jeon, Eun-Sung
Kim, Won-Shik
Le, Dung Tien
Yoo, Jong-Ha
Chong, Chom-Kyu
author_sort Lee, Gyu-Cheol
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the clinical accuracy and analytical sensitivity of the NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B antigen kit in detecting 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 viruses. The kit is one of the most popular rapid diagnostic tests for detecting influenza in Republic of Korea. RESULTS: The NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B kit resulted in 79.4% sensitivity and 97.2% specificity compared to RT-PCR in the detection of the viruses from 1,023 specimens. In addition, the kit was able to detect two strains of novel influenza viruses, Influenza A/California/12/2009(H1N1) and clinically isolated wild-type novel influenza A/H1N1, both of which are spreading epidemically throughout the world. In addition, the correlation between NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B test and conventional RT-PCR was approximately 94%, indicating a high concordance rate. Analytical sensitivity of the kit was approximately 73 ± 3.65 ng/mL of the purified viral proteins and 1.13 ± 0.11 hemagglutination units for the cultured virus. CONCLUSIONS: As the NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B kit showed relatively high sensitivity and specificity and the good correlation with RT-PCR, it will be very useful in the early control of influenza infection and in helping physicians in making early treatment decisions.
format Text
id pubmed-2949845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29498452010-10-06 Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test, NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B Antigen, for detection of the 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 viruses Lee, Gyu-Cheol Jeon, Eun-Sung Kim, Won-Shik Le, Dung Tien Yoo, Jong-Ha Chong, Chom-Kyu Virol J Research BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the clinical accuracy and analytical sensitivity of the NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B antigen kit in detecting 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 viruses. The kit is one of the most popular rapid diagnostic tests for detecting influenza in Republic of Korea. RESULTS: The NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B kit resulted in 79.4% sensitivity and 97.2% specificity compared to RT-PCR in the detection of the viruses from 1,023 specimens. In addition, the kit was able to detect two strains of novel influenza viruses, Influenza A/California/12/2009(H1N1) and clinically isolated wild-type novel influenza A/H1N1, both of which are spreading epidemically throughout the world. In addition, the correlation between NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B test and conventional RT-PCR was approximately 94%, indicating a high concordance rate. Analytical sensitivity of the kit was approximately 73 ± 3.65 ng/mL of the purified viral proteins and 1.13 ± 0.11 hemagglutination units for the cultured virus. CONCLUSIONS: As the NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B kit showed relatively high sensitivity and specificity and the good correlation with RT-PCR, it will be very useful in the early control of influenza infection and in helping physicians in making early treatment decisions. BioMed Central 2010-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2949845/ /pubmed/20849665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-7-244 Text en Copyright ©2010 Lee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Lee, Gyu-Cheol
Jeon, Eun-Sung
Kim, Won-Shik
Le, Dung Tien
Yoo, Jong-Ha
Chong, Chom-Kyu
Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test, NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B Antigen, for detection of the 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 viruses
title Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test, NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B Antigen, for detection of the 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 viruses
title_full Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test, NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B Antigen, for detection of the 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 viruses
title_fullStr Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test, NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B Antigen, for detection of the 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 viruses
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test, NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B Antigen, for detection of the 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 viruses
title_short Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test, NanoSign(® )Influenza A/B Antigen, for detection of the 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 viruses
title_sort evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test, nanosign(® )influenza a/b antigen, for detection of the 2009 pandemic influenza a/h1n1 viruses
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2949845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20849665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-7-244
work_keys_str_mv AT leegyucheol evaluationofarapiddiagnostictestnanosigninfluenzaabantigenfordetectionofthe2009pandemicinfluenzaah1n1viruses
AT jeoneunsung evaluationofarapiddiagnostictestnanosigninfluenzaabantigenfordetectionofthe2009pandemicinfluenzaah1n1viruses
AT kimwonshik evaluationofarapiddiagnostictestnanosigninfluenzaabantigenfordetectionofthe2009pandemicinfluenzaah1n1viruses
AT ledungtien evaluationofarapiddiagnostictestnanosigninfluenzaabantigenfordetectionofthe2009pandemicinfluenzaah1n1viruses
AT yoojongha evaluationofarapiddiagnostictestnanosigninfluenzaabantigenfordetectionofthe2009pandemicinfluenzaah1n1viruses
AT chongchomkyu evaluationofarapiddiagnostictestnanosigninfluenzaabantigenfordetectionofthe2009pandemicinfluenzaah1n1viruses