Cargando…

The evolutionary trajectory of mitochondrial carrier family during metazoan evolution

BACKGROUND: Exploring metabolic evolution is a way to understand metabolic complexity. The substrate transport of mitochondrial carrier family (MCF) influences direct metabolic activities, making it possible to understand indirectly metabolic evolution from the evolution of substrate transport of MC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gong, Ming, Li, Jie, Wang, Meng, Wang, Jin, Zen, Ke, Zhang, Chen-Yu
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2949871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20843381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-10-282
_version_ 1782187600239394816
author Gong, Ming
Li, Jie
Wang, Meng
Wang, Jin
Zen, Ke
Zhang, Chen-Yu
author_facet Gong, Ming
Li, Jie
Wang, Meng
Wang, Jin
Zen, Ke
Zhang, Chen-Yu
author_sort Gong, Ming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Exploring metabolic evolution is a way to understand metabolic complexity. The substrate transport of mitochondrial carrier family (MCF) influences direct metabolic activities, making it possible to understand indirectly metabolic evolution from the evolution of substrate transport of MCF. However, the evolutionary study of substrate transport of MCF does not mean that all the concrete structures of mitochondrial carriers (MCs) must first be gained. RESULTS: Here we studied the alternation of MCF structure and potential correlated functions of MCF during metazoan evolution. The data analysis indicates that the types of substrates transported by MCF as a whole were maintained during metazoan evolution. However, the size of the substrates transported by members of MCs continuously diminished during the evolutionary process. We have found that the ratio of hydrophobic amino acids at specific helix-helix interfaces increases significantly during vertebrate evolution. Amino acid's spatial positioning and the calculating of packing values both indicate the increase in the number of hydrophobic amino acids would lead to a more "tight" structure of the TR domain, which is in agreement with the trend of diminishing size of substrates transported by MCs. In addition, there was a significant increase in the number of carriers of MCF during vertebrate evolution. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that the more "tight" TR structure generated by the increase of the hydrophobic amino acids at specific helix-helix interfaces during vertebrate evolution enhances the substrate selectivity of MCF, reflecting the evolutionary trajectory of MCF during metazoan evolution.
format Text
id pubmed-2949871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29498712010-10-06 The evolutionary trajectory of mitochondrial carrier family during metazoan evolution Gong, Ming Li, Jie Wang, Meng Wang, Jin Zen, Ke Zhang, Chen-Yu BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Exploring metabolic evolution is a way to understand metabolic complexity. The substrate transport of mitochondrial carrier family (MCF) influences direct metabolic activities, making it possible to understand indirectly metabolic evolution from the evolution of substrate transport of MCF. However, the evolutionary study of substrate transport of MCF does not mean that all the concrete structures of mitochondrial carriers (MCs) must first be gained. RESULTS: Here we studied the alternation of MCF structure and potential correlated functions of MCF during metazoan evolution. The data analysis indicates that the types of substrates transported by MCF as a whole were maintained during metazoan evolution. However, the size of the substrates transported by members of MCs continuously diminished during the evolutionary process. We have found that the ratio of hydrophobic amino acids at specific helix-helix interfaces increases significantly during vertebrate evolution. Amino acid's spatial positioning and the calculating of packing values both indicate the increase in the number of hydrophobic amino acids would lead to a more "tight" structure of the TR domain, which is in agreement with the trend of diminishing size of substrates transported by MCs. In addition, there was a significant increase in the number of carriers of MCF during vertebrate evolution. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that the more "tight" TR structure generated by the increase of the hydrophobic amino acids at specific helix-helix interfaces during vertebrate evolution enhances the substrate selectivity of MCF, reflecting the evolutionary trajectory of MCF during metazoan evolution. BioMed Central 2010-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2949871/ /pubmed/20843381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-10-282 Text en Copyright ©2010 Gong et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gong, Ming
Li, Jie
Wang, Meng
Wang, Jin
Zen, Ke
Zhang, Chen-Yu
The evolutionary trajectory of mitochondrial carrier family during metazoan evolution
title The evolutionary trajectory of mitochondrial carrier family during metazoan evolution
title_full The evolutionary trajectory of mitochondrial carrier family during metazoan evolution
title_fullStr The evolutionary trajectory of mitochondrial carrier family during metazoan evolution
title_full_unstemmed The evolutionary trajectory of mitochondrial carrier family during metazoan evolution
title_short The evolutionary trajectory of mitochondrial carrier family during metazoan evolution
title_sort evolutionary trajectory of mitochondrial carrier family during metazoan evolution
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2949871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20843381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-10-282
work_keys_str_mv AT gongming theevolutionarytrajectoryofmitochondrialcarrierfamilyduringmetazoanevolution
AT lijie theevolutionarytrajectoryofmitochondrialcarrierfamilyduringmetazoanevolution
AT wangmeng theevolutionarytrajectoryofmitochondrialcarrierfamilyduringmetazoanevolution
AT wangjin theevolutionarytrajectoryofmitochondrialcarrierfamilyduringmetazoanevolution
AT zenke theevolutionarytrajectoryofmitochondrialcarrierfamilyduringmetazoanevolution
AT zhangchenyu theevolutionarytrajectoryofmitochondrialcarrierfamilyduringmetazoanevolution
AT gongming evolutionarytrajectoryofmitochondrialcarrierfamilyduringmetazoanevolution
AT lijie evolutionarytrajectoryofmitochondrialcarrierfamilyduringmetazoanevolution
AT wangmeng evolutionarytrajectoryofmitochondrialcarrierfamilyduringmetazoanevolution
AT wangjin evolutionarytrajectoryofmitochondrialcarrierfamilyduringmetazoanevolution
AT zenke evolutionarytrajectoryofmitochondrialcarrierfamilyduringmetazoanevolution
AT zhangchenyu evolutionarytrajectoryofmitochondrialcarrierfamilyduringmetazoanevolution