Cargando…

Effectiveness of earlier antenatal screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia in primary care: cluster randomised trial

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of offering antenatal screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia in primary care as a way of facilitating earlier uptake of screening. Design Partial factorial cluster randomised controlled trial. Setting 25 UK general practices from deprived inner cit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dormandy, Elizabeth, Gulliford, Martin, Bryan, Stirling, Roberts, Tracy E, Calnan, Michael, Atkin, Karl, Karnon, Jonathan, Logan, Jane, Kavalier, Fred, Harris, Hilary J, Johnston, Tracey A, Anionwu, Elizabeth N, Tsianakas, Vicki, Jones, Patricia, Marteau, Theresa M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2950261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20923841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5132
_version_ 1782187634885394432
author Dormandy, Elizabeth
Gulliford, Martin
Bryan, Stirling
Roberts, Tracy E
Calnan, Michael
Atkin, Karl
Karnon, Jonathan
Logan, Jane
Kavalier, Fred
Harris, Hilary J
Johnston, Tracey A
Anionwu, Elizabeth N
Tsianakas, Vicki
Jones, Patricia
Marteau, Theresa M
author_facet Dormandy, Elizabeth
Gulliford, Martin
Bryan, Stirling
Roberts, Tracy E
Calnan, Michael
Atkin, Karl
Karnon, Jonathan
Logan, Jane
Kavalier, Fred
Harris, Hilary J
Johnston, Tracey A
Anionwu, Elizabeth N
Tsianakas, Vicki
Jones, Patricia
Marteau, Theresa M
author_sort Dormandy, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of offering antenatal screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia in primary care as a way of facilitating earlier uptake of screening. Design Partial factorial cluster randomised controlled trial. Setting 25 UK general practices from deprived inner city areas. Participants Anonymised data on all pregnant women attending participating practices during a six month period before randomisation and a seven month period after randomisation. This included 1708 eligible women. Intervention Practices were randomised to three groups for seven months: parallel testing in general practice (tests for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia offered to both parents when pregnancy was first reported); sequential testing in general practice (tests offered to mothers when pregnancy was first reported, and subsequently to the partners of women who were found to be carriers); and midwife care (tests offered to mothers at first consultation with a midwife). Main outcome measures The primary outcome (available for all women) was the proportion of eligible women screened before 10 weeks’ (70 days’) gestation. Secondary outcomes were an offer of screening to women before 10 weeks’ gestation, gestational age at testing, mean interval from first visit to the general practice visit to screening, and women’s knowledge of the carrier status of their baby’s father before 77 days’ (11 weeks’) gestation. The study was designed to detect a 20% absolute increase in screening uptake. Cluster level analyses were adjusted for age group, parity, ethnic group, primary care organisation, and number of general practitioners per practice. Results Data were analysed for 1708 eligible women. In the midwife care arm, 2% (9/441) of women were screened before 10 weeks’ gestation compared with 24% (161/677) in the GP parallel testing arm and 28% (167/590) in the GP sequential testing arm. The estimated adjusted difference between the midwife care and GP parallel testing arms was 16.5% (95% confidence interval 7.1% to 25.8%; P=0.002) and between the midwife care and GP sequential testing arms was 27.8% (14.8% to 40.7%; P<0.001). By 26 weeks’ gestation the proportion of women screened across the three trial arms was similar (81%). The proportion of women who knew the carrier status of the baby’s father by 11 weeks’ gestation was 0% (0/441) in the midwife care arm, 2% (13/677) in the GP parallel testing arm (P=0.003), and 1% (3/590) in the GP sequential testing arm (P=0.374). Conclusion Offering antenatal screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia as part of consultations for pregnancy confirmation in primary care increases the proportion of women screened before 10 weeks’ gestation. Even with intervention, however, only a minority of women were screened before 10 weeks. Additional interventions should be considered to achieve testing early in pregnancy for most women wanting such tests so that couples with affected pregnancies have less time pressure to choose options, which may include termination of the pregnancy. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN00677850.
format Text
id pubmed-2950261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29502612010-10-07 Effectiveness of earlier antenatal screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia in primary care: cluster randomised trial Dormandy, Elizabeth Gulliford, Martin Bryan, Stirling Roberts, Tracy E Calnan, Michael Atkin, Karl Karnon, Jonathan Logan, Jane Kavalier, Fred Harris, Hilary J Johnston, Tracey A Anionwu, Elizabeth N Tsianakas, Vicki Jones, Patricia Marteau, Theresa M BMJ Research Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of offering antenatal screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia in primary care as a way of facilitating earlier uptake of screening. Design Partial factorial cluster randomised controlled trial. Setting 25 UK general practices from deprived inner city areas. Participants Anonymised data on all pregnant women attending participating practices during a six month period before randomisation and a seven month period after randomisation. This included 1708 eligible women. Intervention Practices were randomised to three groups for seven months: parallel testing in general practice (tests for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia offered to both parents when pregnancy was first reported); sequential testing in general practice (tests offered to mothers when pregnancy was first reported, and subsequently to the partners of women who were found to be carriers); and midwife care (tests offered to mothers at first consultation with a midwife). Main outcome measures The primary outcome (available for all women) was the proportion of eligible women screened before 10 weeks’ (70 days’) gestation. Secondary outcomes were an offer of screening to women before 10 weeks’ gestation, gestational age at testing, mean interval from first visit to the general practice visit to screening, and women’s knowledge of the carrier status of their baby’s father before 77 days’ (11 weeks’) gestation. The study was designed to detect a 20% absolute increase in screening uptake. Cluster level analyses were adjusted for age group, parity, ethnic group, primary care organisation, and number of general practitioners per practice. Results Data were analysed for 1708 eligible women. In the midwife care arm, 2% (9/441) of women were screened before 10 weeks’ gestation compared with 24% (161/677) in the GP parallel testing arm and 28% (167/590) in the GP sequential testing arm. The estimated adjusted difference between the midwife care and GP parallel testing arms was 16.5% (95% confidence interval 7.1% to 25.8%; P=0.002) and between the midwife care and GP sequential testing arms was 27.8% (14.8% to 40.7%; P<0.001). By 26 weeks’ gestation the proportion of women screened across the three trial arms was similar (81%). The proportion of women who knew the carrier status of the baby’s father by 11 weeks’ gestation was 0% (0/441) in the midwife care arm, 2% (13/677) in the GP parallel testing arm (P=0.003), and 1% (3/590) in the GP sequential testing arm (P=0.374). Conclusion Offering antenatal screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia as part of consultations for pregnancy confirmation in primary care increases the proportion of women screened before 10 weeks’ gestation. Even with intervention, however, only a minority of women were screened before 10 weeks. Additional interventions should be considered to achieve testing early in pregnancy for most women wanting such tests so that couples with affected pregnancies have less time pressure to choose options, which may include termination of the pregnancy. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN00677850. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2010-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2950261/ /pubmed/20923841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5132 Text en © Dormandy et al 2010 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Dormandy, Elizabeth
Gulliford, Martin
Bryan, Stirling
Roberts, Tracy E
Calnan, Michael
Atkin, Karl
Karnon, Jonathan
Logan, Jane
Kavalier, Fred
Harris, Hilary J
Johnston, Tracey A
Anionwu, Elizabeth N
Tsianakas, Vicki
Jones, Patricia
Marteau, Theresa M
Effectiveness of earlier antenatal screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia in primary care: cluster randomised trial
title Effectiveness of earlier antenatal screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia in primary care: cluster randomised trial
title_full Effectiveness of earlier antenatal screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia in primary care: cluster randomised trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of earlier antenatal screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia in primary care: cluster randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of earlier antenatal screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia in primary care: cluster randomised trial
title_short Effectiveness of earlier antenatal screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia in primary care: cluster randomised trial
title_sort effectiveness of earlier antenatal screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia in primary care: cluster randomised trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2950261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20923841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5132
work_keys_str_mv AT dormandyelizabeth effectivenessofearlierantenatalscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseandthalassaemiainprimarycareclusterrandomisedtrial
AT gullifordmartin effectivenessofearlierantenatalscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseandthalassaemiainprimarycareclusterrandomisedtrial
AT bryanstirling effectivenessofearlierantenatalscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseandthalassaemiainprimarycareclusterrandomisedtrial
AT robertstracye effectivenessofearlierantenatalscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseandthalassaemiainprimarycareclusterrandomisedtrial
AT calnanmichael effectivenessofearlierantenatalscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseandthalassaemiainprimarycareclusterrandomisedtrial
AT atkinkarl effectivenessofearlierantenatalscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseandthalassaemiainprimarycareclusterrandomisedtrial
AT karnonjonathan effectivenessofearlierantenatalscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseandthalassaemiainprimarycareclusterrandomisedtrial
AT loganjane effectivenessofearlierantenatalscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseandthalassaemiainprimarycareclusterrandomisedtrial
AT kavalierfred effectivenessofearlierantenatalscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseandthalassaemiainprimarycareclusterrandomisedtrial
AT harrishilaryj effectivenessofearlierantenatalscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseandthalassaemiainprimarycareclusterrandomisedtrial
AT johnstontraceya effectivenessofearlierantenatalscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseandthalassaemiainprimarycareclusterrandomisedtrial
AT anionwuelizabethn effectivenessofearlierantenatalscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseandthalassaemiainprimarycareclusterrandomisedtrial
AT tsianakasvicki effectivenessofearlierantenatalscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseandthalassaemiainprimarycareclusterrandomisedtrial
AT jonespatricia effectivenessofearlierantenatalscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseandthalassaemiainprimarycareclusterrandomisedtrial
AT marteautheresam effectivenessofearlierantenatalscreeningforsicklecelldiseaseandthalassaemiainprimarycareclusterrandomisedtrial