Cargando…

Derivations that enable the testing of fetal urine production as a method of fetal surveillance

PURPOSE: To calculate the measurement error of the hourly fetal urine production rate (HFUPR) and evaluate the implication of different methods for measuring the HFUPR, i.e. ellipsoid versus sum-of-cylinders method. METHODS: The calculation was based on sonographic documentation of the increased bla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fagerquist, Mats A., Fagerquist, Ulf O., Odén, Anders, Blomberg, Sture G., Mattsson, Lars-Ake
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2950271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19847450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1242-6
_version_ 1782187636327186432
author Fagerquist, Mats A.
Fagerquist, Ulf O.
Odén, Anders
Blomberg, Sture G.
Mattsson, Lars-Ake
author_facet Fagerquist, Mats A.
Fagerquist, Ulf O.
Odén, Anders
Blomberg, Sture G.
Mattsson, Lars-Ake
author_sort Fagerquist, Mats A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To calculate the measurement error of the hourly fetal urine production rate (HFUPR) and evaluate the implication of different methods for measuring the HFUPR, i.e. ellipsoid versus sum-of-cylinders method. METHODS: The calculation was based on sonographic documentation of the increased bladder volumes during the filling phase, the bladder volume measurement error and the number and time points of bladder image capture. RESULTS: The probability of a false pathological reading was excluded (0%) with the sum-of-cylinders method for gestational ages of ≥30 weeks. With the ellipsoid method, the risk was higher. The maximum changes which could be exclusively explained by measurement error were four to five times greater with the ellipsoid method compared with the sum-of-cylinders method. CONCLUSIONS: The present paper illustrates a careful evaluation of the HFUPR measurement error and the implications of using different ultrasound methods for bladder volume estimations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00404-009-1242-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Text
id pubmed-2950271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29502712010-10-21 Derivations that enable the testing of fetal urine production as a method of fetal surveillance Fagerquist, Mats A. Fagerquist, Ulf O. Odén, Anders Blomberg, Sture G. Mattsson, Lars-Ake Arch Gynecol Obstet Materno-Fetal Medicine PURPOSE: To calculate the measurement error of the hourly fetal urine production rate (HFUPR) and evaluate the implication of different methods for measuring the HFUPR, i.e. ellipsoid versus sum-of-cylinders method. METHODS: The calculation was based on sonographic documentation of the increased bladder volumes during the filling phase, the bladder volume measurement error and the number and time points of bladder image capture. RESULTS: The probability of a false pathological reading was excluded (0%) with the sum-of-cylinders method for gestational ages of ≥30 weeks. With the ellipsoid method, the risk was higher. The maximum changes which could be exclusively explained by measurement error were four to five times greater with the ellipsoid method compared with the sum-of-cylinders method. CONCLUSIONS: The present paper illustrates a careful evaluation of the HFUPR measurement error and the implications of using different ultrasound methods for bladder volume estimations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00404-009-1242-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer-Verlag 2009-10-16 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2950271/ /pubmed/19847450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1242-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Materno-Fetal Medicine
Fagerquist, Mats A.
Fagerquist, Ulf O.
Odén, Anders
Blomberg, Sture G.
Mattsson, Lars-Ake
Derivations that enable the testing of fetal urine production as a method of fetal surveillance
title Derivations that enable the testing of fetal urine production as a method of fetal surveillance
title_full Derivations that enable the testing of fetal urine production as a method of fetal surveillance
title_fullStr Derivations that enable the testing of fetal urine production as a method of fetal surveillance
title_full_unstemmed Derivations that enable the testing of fetal urine production as a method of fetal surveillance
title_short Derivations that enable the testing of fetal urine production as a method of fetal surveillance
title_sort derivations that enable the testing of fetal urine production as a method of fetal surveillance
topic Materno-Fetal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2950271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19847450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1242-6
work_keys_str_mv AT fagerquistmatsa derivationsthatenablethetestingoffetalurineproductionasamethodoffetalsurveillance
AT fagerquistulfo derivationsthatenablethetestingoffetalurineproductionasamethodoffetalsurveillance
AT odenanders derivationsthatenablethetestingoffetalurineproductionasamethodoffetalsurveillance
AT blombergstureg derivationsthatenablethetestingoffetalurineproductionasamethodoffetalsurveillance
AT mattssonlarsake derivationsthatenablethetestingoffetalurineproductionasamethodoffetalsurveillance