Cargando…

Validation of Results from Knowledge Discovery: Mass Density as a Predictor of Breast Cancer

The purpose of our study is to identify and quantify the association between high breast mass density and breast malignancy using inductive logic programming (ILP) and conditional probabilities, and validate this association in an independent dataset. We ran our ILP algorithm on 62,219 mammographic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woods, Ryan W., Oliphant, Louis, Shinki, Kazuhiko, Page, David, Shavlik, Jude, Burnside, Elizabeth
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2950275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19760292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-009-9235-3
_version_ 1782187637312847872
author Woods, Ryan W.
Oliphant, Louis
Shinki, Kazuhiko
Page, David
Shavlik, Jude
Burnside, Elizabeth
author_facet Woods, Ryan W.
Oliphant, Louis
Shinki, Kazuhiko
Page, David
Shavlik, Jude
Burnside, Elizabeth
author_sort Woods, Ryan W.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of our study is to identify and quantify the association between high breast mass density and breast malignancy using inductive logic programming (ILP) and conditional probabilities, and validate this association in an independent dataset. We ran our ILP algorithm on 62,219 mammographic abnormalities. We set the Aleph ILP system to generate 10,000 rules per malignant finding with a recall >5% and precision >25%. Aleph reported the best rule for each malignant finding. A total of 80 unique rules were learned. A radiologist reviewed all rules and identified potentially interesting rules. High breast mass density appeared in 24% of the learned rules. We confirmed each interesting rule by calculating the probability of malignancy given each mammographic descriptor. High mass density was the fifth highest ranked predictor. To validate the association between mass density and malignancy in an independent dataset, we collected data from 180 consecutive breast biopsies performed between 2005 and 2007. We created a logistic model with benign or malignant outcome as the dependent variable while controlling for potentially confounding factors. We calculated odds ratios based on dichomotized variables. In our logistic regression model, the independent predictors high breast mass density (OR 6.6, CI 2.5–17.6), irregular mass shape (OR 10.0, CI 3.4–29.5), spiculated mass margin (OR 20.4, CI 1.9–222.8), and subject age (β = 0.09, p < 0.0001) significantly predicted malignancy. Both ILP and conditional probabilities show that high breast mass density is an important adjunct predictor of malignancy, and this association is confirmed in an independent data set of prospectively collected mammographic findings.
format Text
id pubmed-2950275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29502752010-10-06 Validation of Results from Knowledge Discovery: Mass Density as a Predictor of Breast Cancer Woods, Ryan W. Oliphant, Louis Shinki, Kazuhiko Page, David Shavlik, Jude Burnside, Elizabeth J Digit Imaging Article The purpose of our study is to identify and quantify the association between high breast mass density and breast malignancy using inductive logic programming (ILP) and conditional probabilities, and validate this association in an independent dataset. We ran our ILP algorithm on 62,219 mammographic abnormalities. We set the Aleph ILP system to generate 10,000 rules per malignant finding with a recall >5% and precision >25%. Aleph reported the best rule for each malignant finding. A total of 80 unique rules were learned. A radiologist reviewed all rules and identified potentially interesting rules. High breast mass density appeared in 24% of the learned rules. We confirmed each interesting rule by calculating the probability of malignancy given each mammographic descriptor. High mass density was the fifth highest ranked predictor. To validate the association between mass density and malignancy in an independent dataset, we collected data from 180 consecutive breast biopsies performed between 2005 and 2007. We created a logistic model with benign or malignant outcome as the dependent variable while controlling for potentially confounding factors. We calculated odds ratios based on dichomotized variables. In our logistic regression model, the independent predictors high breast mass density (OR 6.6, CI 2.5–17.6), irregular mass shape (OR 10.0, CI 3.4–29.5), spiculated mass margin (OR 20.4, CI 1.9–222.8), and subject age (β = 0.09, p < 0.0001) significantly predicted malignancy. Both ILP and conditional probabilities show that high breast mass density is an important adjunct predictor of malignancy, and this association is confirmed in an independent data set of prospectively collected mammographic findings. Springer-Verlag 2009-09-16 2010-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2950275/ /pubmed/19760292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-009-9235-3 Text en © Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2009
spellingShingle Article
Woods, Ryan W.
Oliphant, Louis
Shinki, Kazuhiko
Page, David
Shavlik, Jude
Burnside, Elizabeth
Validation of Results from Knowledge Discovery: Mass Density as a Predictor of Breast Cancer
title Validation of Results from Knowledge Discovery: Mass Density as a Predictor of Breast Cancer
title_full Validation of Results from Knowledge Discovery: Mass Density as a Predictor of Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Validation of Results from Knowledge Discovery: Mass Density as a Predictor of Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Results from Knowledge Discovery: Mass Density as a Predictor of Breast Cancer
title_short Validation of Results from Knowledge Discovery: Mass Density as a Predictor of Breast Cancer
title_sort validation of results from knowledge discovery: mass density as a predictor of breast cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2950275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19760292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-009-9235-3
work_keys_str_mv AT woodsryanw validationofresultsfromknowledgediscoverymassdensityasapredictorofbreastcancer
AT oliphantlouis validationofresultsfromknowledgediscoverymassdensityasapredictorofbreastcancer
AT shinkikazuhiko validationofresultsfromknowledgediscoverymassdensityasapredictorofbreastcancer
AT pagedavid validationofresultsfromknowledgediscoverymassdensityasapredictorofbreastcancer
AT shavlikjude validationofresultsfromknowledgediscoverymassdensityasapredictorofbreastcancer
AT burnsideelizabeth validationofresultsfromknowledgediscoverymassdensityasapredictorofbreastcancer