Cargando…

The RISAP-study: a complex intervention in risk communication and shared decision-making in general practice

BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) and patients find it difficult to talk about risk of future disease, especially when patients have asymptomatic conditions, and treatment options are unlikely to cause immediate perceptible improvements in well-being. Further studies in risk communication trai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirkegaard, Pia, Edwards, Adrian GK, Hansen, Bo, Hansen, Mette D, Jensen, Morten SA, Lauritzen, Torsten, Risoer, Mette B, Thomsen, Janus L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2954954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20860820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-70
_version_ 1782187984848683008
author Kirkegaard, Pia
Edwards, Adrian GK
Hansen, Bo
Hansen, Mette D
Jensen, Morten SA
Lauritzen, Torsten
Risoer, Mette B
Thomsen, Janus L
author_facet Kirkegaard, Pia
Edwards, Adrian GK
Hansen, Bo
Hansen, Mette D
Jensen, Morten SA
Lauritzen, Torsten
Risoer, Mette B
Thomsen, Janus L
author_sort Kirkegaard, Pia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) and patients find it difficult to talk about risk of future disease, especially when patients have asymptomatic conditions, and treatment options are unlikely to cause immediate perceptible improvements in well-being. Further studies in risk communication training are needed. Aim:1) to systematically develop, describe and evaluate a complex intervention comprising a training programme for GPs in risk communication and shared decision-making, 2) to evaluate the effect of the training programme on real-life consultations between GPs and patients with high cholesterol levels, and 3) to evaluate patients' reactions during and after the consultations. METHODS/DESIGN: The effect of the complex intervention, based around a training programme, will be evaluated in a cluster-randomised controlled trial with an intervention group and an active control group with 40 GPs and 280 patients in each group. The GPs will receive a questionnaire at baseline and after 6 months about attitudes towards risk communication and cholesterol-reducing medication. After each consultation with a participating high cholesterol-patient, the GPs will complete a questionnaire about decision satisfaction (Provider Decision Process Assessment Instrument). The patients will receive a questionnaire at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. It includes questions about adherence to chosen treatment (Morisky Compliance Scale), self-rated health (SF-12), enablement (Patient Enablement Instrument), and risk communication and decision-making effectiveness (COMRADE Scale). Prescriptions, contacts to the health services, and cholesterol level will be drawn from the registers. In each group, 12 consultations will be observed and tape-recorded. The patients from these 24 consultations will be interviewed immediately after the consultation and re-interviewed after 6 months. Eight purposefully selected GPs from the intervention group will be interviewed in a focus group 6 months after participation in the training programme. The process and context of the RISAP-study will be investigated in detail using an action research approach, in order to analyse adaptation of the intervention model to the specific context. DISCUSSION: This study aims at providing GPs and patients with a firm basis for active deliberation about preventive treatment options, with a view to optimising adherence to chosen treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System NCT01187056
format Text
id pubmed-2954954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29549542010-10-15 The RISAP-study: a complex intervention in risk communication and shared decision-making in general practice Kirkegaard, Pia Edwards, Adrian GK Hansen, Bo Hansen, Mette D Jensen, Morten SA Lauritzen, Torsten Risoer, Mette B Thomsen, Janus L BMC Fam Pract Study Protocol BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) and patients find it difficult to talk about risk of future disease, especially when patients have asymptomatic conditions, and treatment options are unlikely to cause immediate perceptible improvements in well-being. Further studies in risk communication training are needed. Aim:1) to systematically develop, describe and evaluate a complex intervention comprising a training programme for GPs in risk communication and shared decision-making, 2) to evaluate the effect of the training programme on real-life consultations between GPs and patients with high cholesterol levels, and 3) to evaluate patients' reactions during and after the consultations. METHODS/DESIGN: The effect of the complex intervention, based around a training programme, will be evaluated in a cluster-randomised controlled trial with an intervention group and an active control group with 40 GPs and 280 patients in each group. The GPs will receive a questionnaire at baseline and after 6 months about attitudes towards risk communication and cholesterol-reducing medication. After each consultation with a participating high cholesterol-patient, the GPs will complete a questionnaire about decision satisfaction (Provider Decision Process Assessment Instrument). The patients will receive a questionnaire at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. It includes questions about adherence to chosen treatment (Morisky Compliance Scale), self-rated health (SF-12), enablement (Patient Enablement Instrument), and risk communication and decision-making effectiveness (COMRADE Scale). Prescriptions, contacts to the health services, and cholesterol level will be drawn from the registers. In each group, 12 consultations will be observed and tape-recorded. The patients from these 24 consultations will be interviewed immediately after the consultation and re-interviewed after 6 months. Eight purposefully selected GPs from the intervention group will be interviewed in a focus group 6 months after participation in the training programme. The process and context of the RISAP-study will be investigated in detail using an action research approach, in order to analyse adaptation of the intervention model to the specific context. DISCUSSION: This study aims at providing GPs and patients with a firm basis for active deliberation about preventive treatment options, with a view to optimising adherence to chosen treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System NCT01187056 BioMed Central 2010-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2954954/ /pubmed/20860820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-70 Text en Copyright ©2010 Kirkegaard et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kirkegaard, Pia
Edwards, Adrian GK
Hansen, Bo
Hansen, Mette D
Jensen, Morten SA
Lauritzen, Torsten
Risoer, Mette B
Thomsen, Janus L
The RISAP-study: a complex intervention in risk communication and shared decision-making in general practice
title The RISAP-study: a complex intervention in risk communication and shared decision-making in general practice
title_full The RISAP-study: a complex intervention in risk communication and shared decision-making in general practice
title_fullStr The RISAP-study: a complex intervention in risk communication and shared decision-making in general practice
title_full_unstemmed The RISAP-study: a complex intervention in risk communication and shared decision-making in general practice
title_short The RISAP-study: a complex intervention in risk communication and shared decision-making in general practice
title_sort risap-study: a complex intervention in risk communication and shared decision-making in general practice
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2954954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20860820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-70
work_keys_str_mv AT kirkegaardpia therisapstudyacomplexinterventioninriskcommunicationandshareddecisionmakingingeneralpractice
AT edwardsadriangk therisapstudyacomplexinterventioninriskcommunicationandshareddecisionmakingingeneralpractice
AT hansenbo therisapstudyacomplexinterventioninriskcommunicationandshareddecisionmakingingeneralpractice
AT hansenmetted therisapstudyacomplexinterventioninriskcommunicationandshareddecisionmakingingeneralpractice
AT jensenmortensa therisapstudyacomplexinterventioninriskcommunicationandshareddecisionmakingingeneralpractice
AT lauritzentorsten therisapstudyacomplexinterventioninriskcommunicationandshareddecisionmakingingeneralpractice
AT risoermetteb therisapstudyacomplexinterventioninriskcommunicationandshareddecisionmakingingeneralpractice
AT thomsenjanusl therisapstudyacomplexinterventioninriskcommunicationandshareddecisionmakingingeneralpractice
AT kirkegaardpia risapstudyacomplexinterventioninriskcommunicationandshareddecisionmakingingeneralpractice
AT edwardsadriangk risapstudyacomplexinterventioninriskcommunicationandshareddecisionmakingingeneralpractice
AT hansenbo risapstudyacomplexinterventioninriskcommunicationandshareddecisionmakingingeneralpractice
AT hansenmetted risapstudyacomplexinterventioninriskcommunicationandshareddecisionmakingingeneralpractice
AT jensenmortensa risapstudyacomplexinterventioninriskcommunicationandshareddecisionmakingingeneralpractice
AT lauritzentorsten risapstudyacomplexinterventioninriskcommunicationandshareddecisionmakingingeneralpractice
AT risoermetteb risapstudyacomplexinterventioninriskcommunicationandshareddecisionmakingingeneralpractice
AT thomsenjanusl risapstudyacomplexinterventioninriskcommunicationandshareddecisionmakingingeneralpractice