Cargando…

Validation of the Rasch-based Depression Screening in a large scale German general population sample

BACKGROUND: The study aimed at presenting normative data for both parallel forms of the "Rasch-based Depression Screening (DESC)", to examine its Rasch model conformity and convergent and divergent validity based on a representative sample of the German general population. METHODS: The sam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forkmann, Thomas, Boecker, Maren, Wirtz, Markus, Glaesmer, Heide, Brähler, Elmar, Norra, Christine, Gauggel, Siegfried
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2954976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20858272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-105
_version_ 1782187987660963840
author Forkmann, Thomas
Boecker, Maren
Wirtz, Markus
Glaesmer, Heide
Brähler, Elmar
Norra, Christine
Gauggel, Siegfried
author_facet Forkmann, Thomas
Boecker, Maren
Wirtz, Markus
Glaesmer, Heide
Brähler, Elmar
Norra, Christine
Gauggel, Siegfried
author_sort Forkmann, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The study aimed at presenting normative data for both parallel forms of the "Rasch-based Depression Screening (DESC)", to examine its Rasch model conformity and convergent and divergent validity based on a representative sample of the German general population. METHODS: The sample was selected with the assistance of a demographic consulting company applying a face to face interview (N = 2509; mean age = 49.4, SD = 18.2; 55.8% women). Adherence to Rasch model assumptions was determined with analysis of Rasch model fit (infit and outfit), unidimensionality, local independence (principal component factor analysis of the residuals, PCFAR) and differential item functioning (DIF) with regard to participants' age and gender. Norm values were calculated. Convergent and divergent validity was determined through intercorrelations with the depression and anxiety subscales of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D and HADS-A). RESULTS: Fit statistics were below critical values (< 1.3). There were no signs of DIF. The PCFAR revealed that the Rasch dimension "depression" explained 68.5% (DESC-I) and 69.3% (DESC-II) of the variance, respectively which suggests unidimensionality and local independence of the DESC. Correlations with HADS-D were r(DESC-I ) = .61 and r(DESC-II ) = .60, whereas correlations with HADS-A were r(DESC-I ) = .62 and r(DESC-II ) = .60. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided further support for the psychometric quality of the DESC. Both forms of the DESC adhered to Rasch model assumptions and showed intercorrelations with HADS subscales that are in line with the literature. The presented normative data offer important advancements for the interpretation of the questionnaire scores and enhance its usefulness for clinical and research applications.
format Text
id pubmed-2954976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29549762010-10-15 Validation of the Rasch-based Depression Screening in a large scale German general population sample Forkmann, Thomas Boecker, Maren Wirtz, Markus Glaesmer, Heide Brähler, Elmar Norra, Christine Gauggel, Siegfried Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The study aimed at presenting normative data for both parallel forms of the "Rasch-based Depression Screening (DESC)", to examine its Rasch model conformity and convergent and divergent validity based on a representative sample of the German general population. METHODS: The sample was selected with the assistance of a demographic consulting company applying a face to face interview (N = 2509; mean age = 49.4, SD = 18.2; 55.8% women). Adherence to Rasch model assumptions was determined with analysis of Rasch model fit (infit and outfit), unidimensionality, local independence (principal component factor analysis of the residuals, PCFAR) and differential item functioning (DIF) with regard to participants' age and gender. Norm values were calculated. Convergent and divergent validity was determined through intercorrelations with the depression and anxiety subscales of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D and HADS-A). RESULTS: Fit statistics were below critical values (< 1.3). There were no signs of DIF. The PCFAR revealed that the Rasch dimension "depression" explained 68.5% (DESC-I) and 69.3% (DESC-II) of the variance, respectively which suggests unidimensionality and local independence of the DESC. Correlations with HADS-D were r(DESC-I ) = .61 and r(DESC-II ) = .60, whereas correlations with HADS-A were r(DESC-I ) = .62 and r(DESC-II ) = .60. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided further support for the psychometric quality of the DESC. Both forms of the DESC adhered to Rasch model assumptions and showed intercorrelations with HADS subscales that are in line with the literature. The presented normative data offer important advancements for the interpretation of the questionnaire scores and enhance its usefulness for clinical and research applications. BioMed Central 2010-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2954976/ /pubmed/20858272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-105 Text en Copyright © 2010 Forkmann et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Forkmann, Thomas
Boecker, Maren
Wirtz, Markus
Glaesmer, Heide
Brähler, Elmar
Norra, Christine
Gauggel, Siegfried
Validation of the Rasch-based Depression Screening in a large scale German general population sample
title Validation of the Rasch-based Depression Screening in a large scale German general population sample
title_full Validation of the Rasch-based Depression Screening in a large scale German general population sample
title_fullStr Validation of the Rasch-based Depression Screening in a large scale German general population sample
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Rasch-based Depression Screening in a large scale German general population sample
title_short Validation of the Rasch-based Depression Screening in a large scale German general population sample
title_sort validation of the rasch-based depression screening in a large scale german general population sample
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2954976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20858272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-105
work_keys_str_mv AT forkmannthomas validationoftheraschbaseddepressionscreeninginalargescalegermangeneralpopulationsample
AT boeckermaren validationoftheraschbaseddepressionscreeninginalargescalegermangeneralpopulationsample
AT wirtzmarkus validationoftheraschbaseddepressionscreeninginalargescalegermangeneralpopulationsample
AT glaesmerheide validationoftheraschbaseddepressionscreeninginalargescalegermangeneralpopulationsample
AT brahlerelmar validationoftheraschbaseddepressionscreeninginalargescalegermangeneralpopulationsample
AT norrachristine validationoftheraschbaseddepressionscreeninginalargescalegermangeneralpopulationsample
AT gauggelsiegfried validationoftheraschbaseddepressionscreeninginalargescalegermangeneralpopulationsample