Cargando…
Esophageal cancer in the elderly: an analysis of the factors associated with treatment decisions and outcomes
BACKGROUND: Only limited data has been reported so far regarding oesophageal cancer (EC) in elderly patients. The aim of the study is to identify the baseline parameters that influenced therapeutic decision. METHODS: All consecutive patients 70 years or older being treated for EC were retrospectivel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2955041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20868479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-510 |
_version_ | 1782188002869510144 |
---|---|
author | Tougeron, David Hamidou, Hadji Scotté, Michel Di Fiore, Frédéric Antonietti, Michel Paillot, Bernard Michel, Pierre |
author_facet | Tougeron, David Hamidou, Hadji Scotté, Michel Di Fiore, Frédéric Antonietti, Michel Paillot, Bernard Michel, Pierre |
author_sort | Tougeron, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Only limited data has been reported so far regarding oesophageal cancer (EC) in elderly patients. The aim of the study is to identify the baseline parameters that influenced therapeutic decision. METHODS: All consecutive patients 70 years or older being treated for EC were retrospectively analyzed. Patients without visceral metastasis were divided into two groups: treatment with curative intent (chemoradiotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy, mucosectomy or photodynamic therapy) or best supportive care (BSC). Patients with metastasis were divided into two groups: palliative treatment (chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy) or BSC. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-two patients were studied. Mean age was 76.5 ± 5.5 years and 22.4% of patients had visceral metastasis. In patients without visceral metastasis (n = 220) the majority had treatment with curative intent (n = 151) whereas in patients with metastasis (n = 62) the majority had BSC (n = 32). Severe adverse events (≥ grade 3) were observed in only 17% of the patients. Patients without specific carcinologic treatment were older, had more weight loss, worse WHO performance status and Charlson score in multivariate analysis. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that elderly patients with an EC could benefit from cancer treatment without major toxicities. Weight loss, WHO performance status and the Charlson score could be used to select the appropriate treatment in an elderly patient. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2955041 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29550412010-10-15 Esophageal cancer in the elderly: an analysis of the factors associated with treatment decisions and outcomes Tougeron, David Hamidou, Hadji Scotté, Michel Di Fiore, Frédéric Antonietti, Michel Paillot, Bernard Michel, Pierre BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Only limited data has been reported so far regarding oesophageal cancer (EC) in elderly patients. The aim of the study is to identify the baseline parameters that influenced therapeutic decision. METHODS: All consecutive patients 70 years or older being treated for EC were retrospectively analyzed. Patients without visceral metastasis were divided into two groups: treatment with curative intent (chemoradiotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy, mucosectomy or photodynamic therapy) or best supportive care (BSC). Patients with metastasis were divided into two groups: palliative treatment (chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy) or BSC. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-two patients were studied. Mean age was 76.5 ± 5.5 years and 22.4% of patients had visceral metastasis. In patients without visceral metastasis (n = 220) the majority had treatment with curative intent (n = 151) whereas in patients with metastasis (n = 62) the majority had BSC (n = 32). Severe adverse events (≥ grade 3) were observed in only 17% of the patients. Patients without specific carcinologic treatment were older, had more weight loss, worse WHO performance status and Charlson score in multivariate analysis. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that elderly patients with an EC could benefit from cancer treatment without major toxicities. Weight loss, WHO performance status and the Charlson score could be used to select the appropriate treatment in an elderly patient. BioMed Central 2010-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2955041/ /pubmed/20868479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-510 Text en Copyright ©2010 Tougeron et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tougeron, David Hamidou, Hadji Scotté, Michel Di Fiore, Frédéric Antonietti, Michel Paillot, Bernard Michel, Pierre Esophageal cancer in the elderly: an analysis of the factors associated with treatment decisions and outcomes |
title | Esophageal cancer in the elderly: an analysis of the factors associated with treatment decisions and outcomes |
title_full | Esophageal cancer in the elderly: an analysis of the factors associated with treatment decisions and outcomes |
title_fullStr | Esophageal cancer in the elderly: an analysis of the factors associated with treatment decisions and outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Esophageal cancer in the elderly: an analysis of the factors associated with treatment decisions and outcomes |
title_short | Esophageal cancer in the elderly: an analysis of the factors associated with treatment decisions and outcomes |
title_sort | esophageal cancer in the elderly: an analysis of the factors associated with treatment decisions and outcomes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2955041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20868479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-10-510 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tougerondavid esophagealcancerintheelderlyananalysisofthefactorsassociatedwithtreatmentdecisionsandoutcomes AT hamidouhadji esophagealcancerintheelderlyananalysisofthefactorsassociatedwithtreatmentdecisionsandoutcomes AT scottemichel esophagealcancerintheelderlyananalysisofthefactorsassociatedwithtreatmentdecisionsandoutcomes AT difiorefrederic esophagealcancerintheelderlyananalysisofthefactorsassociatedwithtreatmentdecisionsandoutcomes AT antoniettimichel esophagealcancerintheelderlyananalysisofthefactorsassociatedwithtreatmentdecisionsandoutcomes AT paillotbernard esophagealcancerintheelderlyananalysisofthefactorsassociatedwithtreatmentdecisionsandoutcomes AT michelpierre esophagealcancerintheelderlyananalysisofthefactorsassociatedwithtreatmentdecisionsandoutcomes |