Cargando…

Large orthotopic reservoir stone burden: Role of open surgery

PURPOSE: To present our experience in open poucholithotomy as a primary management of large orthotopic reservoir stone burden and discuss different management options. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of men underwent radical cystectomy and orthotopic urinary diversion were retrospectively reviewed as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Madbouly, Khaled
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2955233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20981195
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.68856
_version_ 1782188012282576896
author Madbouly, Khaled
author_facet Madbouly, Khaled
author_sort Madbouly, Khaled
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To present our experience in open poucholithotomy as a primary management of large orthotopic reservoir stone burden and discuss different management options. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of men underwent radical cystectomy and orthotopic urinary diversion were retrospectively reviewed as regards pouch stone formation. Patients with large reservoir stone burden managed by open poucholithotomy were further selected. RESULTS: Large reservoir stone burden was encountered in 12 post radical cystectomy men. All underwent open poucholithotomy as a primary management of their reservoir stones. Median age at cystectomy was 46 (range: 32-55) years with a median total follow up period of 214.15 (range: 147-257) months and a median interval to stone detection of 99 (range: 63-132) months. The median stone burden was 5260 (range: 3179-20410) mm(2). All patients were continent during the day while 5 showed nocturnal enuresis; 2 of them became continent after removal of the stones. Post poucholithotomy, all patients had sterile urine cultures except one who showed occasional colonization. None of the 12 patients showed stone recurrence after poucholithotomy. Two patients underwent revision of a dessuscepted nipple valve in association with stone removal. CONCLUSIONS: Open poucholithotomy for large reservoir stone burden is a feasible and safe option. It saves the reservoir mesentery and adjacent bowel. It allows complete removal of the stone(s) leaving no residual fragments. Furthermore, it permits correction of concomitant reservoir abnormalities.
format Text
id pubmed-2955233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29552332010-10-27 Large orthotopic reservoir stone burden: Role of open surgery Madbouly, Khaled Urol Ann Original Article PURPOSE: To present our experience in open poucholithotomy as a primary management of large orthotopic reservoir stone burden and discuss different management options. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of men underwent radical cystectomy and orthotopic urinary diversion were retrospectively reviewed as regards pouch stone formation. Patients with large reservoir stone burden managed by open poucholithotomy were further selected. RESULTS: Large reservoir stone burden was encountered in 12 post radical cystectomy men. All underwent open poucholithotomy as a primary management of their reservoir stones. Median age at cystectomy was 46 (range: 32-55) years with a median total follow up period of 214.15 (range: 147-257) months and a median interval to stone detection of 99 (range: 63-132) months. The median stone burden was 5260 (range: 3179-20410) mm(2). All patients were continent during the day while 5 showed nocturnal enuresis; 2 of them became continent after removal of the stones. Post poucholithotomy, all patients had sterile urine cultures except one who showed occasional colonization. None of the 12 patients showed stone recurrence after poucholithotomy. Two patients underwent revision of a dessuscepted nipple valve in association with stone removal. CONCLUSIONS: Open poucholithotomy for large reservoir stone burden is a feasible and safe option. It saves the reservoir mesentery and adjacent bowel. It allows complete removal of the stone(s) leaving no residual fragments. Furthermore, it permits correction of concomitant reservoir abnormalities. Medknow Publications 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2955233/ /pubmed/20981195 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.68856 Text en © Urology Annals http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Madbouly, Khaled
Large orthotopic reservoir stone burden: Role of open surgery
title Large orthotopic reservoir stone burden: Role of open surgery
title_full Large orthotopic reservoir stone burden: Role of open surgery
title_fullStr Large orthotopic reservoir stone burden: Role of open surgery
title_full_unstemmed Large orthotopic reservoir stone burden: Role of open surgery
title_short Large orthotopic reservoir stone burden: Role of open surgery
title_sort large orthotopic reservoir stone burden: role of open surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2955233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20981195
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.68856
work_keys_str_mv AT madboulykhaled largeorthotopicreservoirstoneburdenroleofopensurgery