Cargando…
Emergence of Modular Structure in a Large-Scale Brain Network with Interactions between Dynamics and Connectivity
A network of 32 or 64 connected neural masses, each representing a large population of interacting excitatory and inhibitory neurons and generating an electroencephalography/magnetoencephalography like output signal, was used to demonstrate how an interaction between dynamics and connectivity might...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2955452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20953245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2010.00133 |
_version_ | 1782188026460372992 |
---|---|
author | Stam, Cornelis J. Hillebrand, Arjan Wang, Huijuan Van Mieghem, Piet |
author_facet | Stam, Cornelis J. Hillebrand, Arjan Wang, Huijuan Van Mieghem, Piet |
author_sort | Stam, Cornelis J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A network of 32 or 64 connected neural masses, each representing a large population of interacting excitatory and inhibitory neurons and generating an electroencephalography/magnetoencephalography like output signal, was used to demonstrate how an interaction between dynamics and connectivity might explain the emergence of complex network features, in particular modularity. Network evolution was modeled by two processes: (i) synchronization dependent plasticity (SDP) and (ii) growth dependent plasticity (GDP). In the case of SDP, connections between neural masses were strengthened when they were strongly synchronized, and were weakened when they were not. GDP was modeled as a homeostatic process with random, distance dependent outgrowth of new connections between neural masses. GDP alone resulted in stable networks with distance dependent connection strengths, typical small-world features, but no degree correlations and only weak modularity. SDP applied to random networks induced clustering, but no clear modules. Stronger modularity evolved only through an interaction of SDP and GDP, with the number and size of the modules depending on the relative strength of both processes, as well as on the size of the network. Lesioning part of the network, after a stable state was achieved, resulted in a temporary disruption of the network structure. The model gives a possible scenario to explain how modularity can arise in developing brain networks, and makes predictions about the time course of network changes during development and following acute lesions. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2955452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29554522010-10-15 Emergence of Modular Structure in a Large-Scale Brain Network with Interactions between Dynamics and Connectivity Stam, Cornelis J. Hillebrand, Arjan Wang, Huijuan Van Mieghem, Piet Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience A network of 32 or 64 connected neural masses, each representing a large population of interacting excitatory and inhibitory neurons and generating an electroencephalography/magnetoencephalography like output signal, was used to demonstrate how an interaction between dynamics and connectivity might explain the emergence of complex network features, in particular modularity. Network evolution was modeled by two processes: (i) synchronization dependent plasticity (SDP) and (ii) growth dependent plasticity (GDP). In the case of SDP, connections between neural masses were strengthened when they were strongly synchronized, and were weakened when they were not. GDP was modeled as a homeostatic process with random, distance dependent outgrowth of new connections between neural masses. GDP alone resulted in stable networks with distance dependent connection strengths, typical small-world features, but no degree correlations and only weak modularity. SDP applied to random networks induced clustering, but no clear modules. Stronger modularity evolved only through an interaction of SDP and GDP, with the number and size of the modules depending on the relative strength of both processes, as well as on the size of the network. Lesioning part of the network, after a stable state was achieved, resulted in a temporary disruption of the network structure. The model gives a possible scenario to explain how modularity can arise in developing brain networks, and makes predictions about the time course of network changes during development and following acute lesions. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2955452/ /pubmed/20953245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2010.00133 Text en Copyright © 2010 Stam, Hillebrand, Wang and Van Mieghem. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Stam, Cornelis J. Hillebrand, Arjan Wang, Huijuan Van Mieghem, Piet Emergence of Modular Structure in a Large-Scale Brain Network with Interactions between Dynamics and Connectivity |
title | Emergence of Modular Structure in a Large-Scale Brain Network with Interactions between Dynamics and Connectivity |
title_full | Emergence of Modular Structure in a Large-Scale Brain Network with Interactions between Dynamics and Connectivity |
title_fullStr | Emergence of Modular Structure in a Large-Scale Brain Network with Interactions between Dynamics and Connectivity |
title_full_unstemmed | Emergence of Modular Structure in a Large-Scale Brain Network with Interactions between Dynamics and Connectivity |
title_short | Emergence of Modular Structure in a Large-Scale Brain Network with Interactions between Dynamics and Connectivity |
title_sort | emergence of modular structure in a large-scale brain network with interactions between dynamics and connectivity |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2955452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20953245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2010.00133 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stamcornelisj emergenceofmodularstructureinalargescalebrainnetworkwithinteractionsbetweendynamicsandconnectivity AT hillebrandarjan emergenceofmodularstructureinalargescalebrainnetworkwithinteractionsbetweendynamicsandconnectivity AT wanghuijuan emergenceofmodularstructureinalargescalebrainnetworkwithinteractionsbetweendynamicsandconnectivity AT vanmieghempiet emergenceofmodularstructureinalargescalebrainnetworkwithinteractionsbetweendynamicsandconnectivity |