Cargando…

Innate Recognition of Pheromone and Food Odors in Moths: A Common Mechanism in the Antennal Lobe?

The survival of an animal often depends on an innate response to a particular sensory stimulus. For an adult male moth, two categories of odors are innately attractive: pheromone released by conspecific females, and the floral scents of certain, often co-evolved, plants. These odors consist of multi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Joshua P., Hildebrand, John G.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2955495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20953251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00159
_version_ 1782188029754998784
author Martin, Joshua P.
Hildebrand, John G.
author_facet Martin, Joshua P.
Hildebrand, John G.
author_sort Martin, Joshua P.
collection PubMed
description The survival of an animal often depends on an innate response to a particular sensory stimulus. For an adult male moth, two categories of odors are innately attractive: pheromone released by conspecific females, and the floral scents of certain, often co-evolved, plants. These odors consist of multiple volatiles in characteristic mixtures. Here, we review evidence that both categories of odors are processed as sensory objects, and we suggest a mechanism in the primary olfactory center, the antennal lobe (AL), that encodes the configuration of these mixtures and may underlie recognition of innately attractive odors. In the pheromone system, mixtures of two or three volatiles elicit upwind flight. Peripheral changes are associated with behavioral changes in speciation, and suggest the existence of a pattern recognition mechanism for pheromone mixtures in the AL. Moths are similarly innately attracted to certain floral scents. Though floral scents consist of multiple volatiles that activate a broad array of receptor neurons, only a smaller subset, numerically comparable to pheromone mixtures, is necessary and sufficient to elicit behavior. Both pheromone and floral scent mixtures that produce attraction to the odor source elicit synchronous action potentials in particular populations of output (projection) neurons (PNs) in the AL. We propose a model in which the synchronous output of a population of PNs encodes the configuration of an innately attractive mixture, and thus comprises an innate mechanism for releasing odor-tracking behavior. The particular example of olfaction in moths may inform the general question of how sensory objects trigger innate responses.
format Text
id pubmed-2955495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29554952010-10-15 Innate Recognition of Pheromone and Food Odors in Moths: A Common Mechanism in the Antennal Lobe? Martin, Joshua P. Hildebrand, John G. Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience The survival of an animal often depends on an innate response to a particular sensory stimulus. For an adult male moth, two categories of odors are innately attractive: pheromone released by conspecific females, and the floral scents of certain, often co-evolved, plants. These odors consist of multiple volatiles in characteristic mixtures. Here, we review evidence that both categories of odors are processed as sensory objects, and we suggest a mechanism in the primary olfactory center, the antennal lobe (AL), that encodes the configuration of these mixtures and may underlie recognition of innately attractive odors. In the pheromone system, mixtures of two or three volatiles elicit upwind flight. Peripheral changes are associated with behavioral changes in speciation, and suggest the existence of a pattern recognition mechanism for pheromone mixtures in the AL. Moths are similarly innately attracted to certain floral scents. Though floral scents consist of multiple volatiles that activate a broad array of receptor neurons, only a smaller subset, numerically comparable to pheromone mixtures, is necessary and sufficient to elicit behavior. Both pheromone and floral scent mixtures that produce attraction to the odor source elicit synchronous action potentials in particular populations of output (projection) neurons (PNs) in the AL. We propose a model in which the synchronous output of a population of PNs encodes the configuration of an innately attractive mixture, and thus comprises an innate mechanism for releasing odor-tracking behavior. The particular example of olfaction in moths may inform the general question of how sensory objects trigger innate responses. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2955495/ /pubmed/20953251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00159 Text en Copyright © 2010 Martin and Hildebrand. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Martin, Joshua P.
Hildebrand, John G.
Innate Recognition of Pheromone and Food Odors in Moths: A Common Mechanism in the Antennal Lobe?
title Innate Recognition of Pheromone and Food Odors in Moths: A Common Mechanism in the Antennal Lobe?
title_full Innate Recognition of Pheromone and Food Odors in Moths: A Common Mechanism in the Antennal Lobe?
title_fullStr Innate Recognition of Pheromone and Food Odors in Moths: A Common Mechanism in the Antennal Lobe?
title_full_unstemmed Innate Recognition of Pheromone and Food Odors in Moths: A Common Mechanism in the Antennal Lobe?
title_short Innate Recognition of Pheromone and Food Odors in Moths: A Common Mechanism in the Antennal Lobe?
title_sort innate recognition of pheromone and food odors in moths: a common mechanism in the antennal lobe?
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2955495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20953251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00159
work_keys_str_mv AT martinjoshuap innaterecognitionofpheromoneandfoododorsinmothsacommonmechanismintheantennallobe
AT hildebrandjohng innaterecognitionofpheromoneandfoododorsinmothsacommonmechanismintheantennallobe