Cargando…

Is the remobilization of S and N reserves for seed filling of winter oilseed rape modulated by sulphate restrictions occurring at different growth stages?

How the remobilization of S and N reserves can meet the needs of seeds of oilseed rape subject to limitation of S fertilization remains largely unclear. Thus, this survey aims to determine the incidence of sulphate restriction [low S (LS)] applied at bolting [growth stage (GS) 32], visible bud (GS 5...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dubousset, L., Etienne, P., Avice, J. C.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2955745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20693411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq233
_version_ 1782188080446308352
author Dubousset, L.
Etienne, P.
Avice, J. C.
author_facet Dubousset, L.
Etienne, P.
Avice, J. C.
author_sort Dubousset, L.
collection PubMed
description How the remobilization of S and N reserves can meet the needs of seeds of oilseed rape subject to limitation of S fertilization remains largely unclear. Thus, this survey aims to determine the incidence of sulphate restriction [low S (LS)] applied at bolting [growth stage (GS) 32], visible bud (GS 53), and start of pod filling (GS 70) on source–sink relationships for S and N, and on the dynamics of endogenous/exogenous S and N contributing to seed yield and quality. Sulphate restrictions applied at GS 32, GS 53, and GS 70 were annotated LS(32), LS(53), and LS(70). Long-term (34)SO(4)(2−) and (15)NO(3)(−) labelling was used to explore S and N partitioning at the whole-plant level. In LS(53), the sulphur remobilization efficiency (SRE) to seeds increased, but not enough to maintain seed quality. In LS(32), an early S remobilization from leaves provided S for root, stem, and pod growth, but the subsequent demand for seed development was not met adequately and the N utilization efficiency (NUtE) was reduced when compared with high S (HS). The highest SRE (65±1.2% of the remobilized S) associated with an efficient foliar S mobilization (with minimal residual S concentrations of 0.1–0.2% dry matter) was observed under LS(70) treatment, which did not affect yield components.
format Text
id pubmed-2955745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29557452010-10-18 Is the remobilization of S and N reserves for seed filling of winter oilseed rape modulated by sulphate restrictions occurring at different growth stages? Dubousset, L. Etienne, P. Avice, J. C. J Exp Bot Research Papers How the remobilization of S and N reserves can meet the needs of seeds of oilseed rape subject to limitation of S fertilization remains largely unclear. Thus, this survey aims to determine the incidence of sulphate restriction [low S (LS)] applied at bolting [growth stage (GS) 32], visible bud (GS 53), and start of pod filling (GS 70) on source–sink relationships for S and N, and on the dynamics of endogenous/exogenous S and N contributing to seed yield and quality. Sulphate restrictions applied at GS 32, GS 53, and GS 70 were annotated LS(32), LS(53), and LS(70). Long-term (34)SO(4)(2−) and (15)NO(3)(−) labelling was used to explore S and N partitioning at the whole-plant level. In LS(53), the sulphur remobilization efficiency (SRE) to seeds increased, but not enough to maintain seed quality. In LS(32), an early S remobilization from leaves provided S for root, stem, and pod growth, but the subsequent demand for seed development was not met adequately and the N utilization efficiency (NUtE) was reduced when compared with high S (HS). The highest SRE (65±1.2% of the remobilized S) associated with an efficient foliar S mobilization (with minimal residual S concentrations of 0.1–0.2% dry matter) was observed under LS(70) treatment, which did not affect yield components. Oxford University Press 2010-10 2010-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2955745/ /pubmed/20693411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq233 Text en © 2010 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This paper is available online free of all access charges (see http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/open_access.html for further details)
spellingShingle Research Papers
Dubousset, L.
Etienne, P.
Avice, J. C.
Is the remobilization of S and N reserves for seed filling of winter oilseed rape modulated by sulphate restrictions occurring at different growth stages?
title Is the remobilization of S and N reserves for seed filling of winter oilseed rape modulated by sulphate restrictions occurring at different growth stages?
title_full Is the remobilization of S and N reserves for seed filling of winter oilseed rape modulated by sulphate restrictions occurring at different growth stages?
title_fullStr Is the remobilization of S and N reserves for seed filling of winter oilseed rape modulated by sulphate restrictions occurring at different growth stages?
title_full_unstemmed Is the remobilization of S and N reserves for seed filling of winter oilseed rape modulated by sulphate restrictions occurring at different growth stages?
title_short Is the remobilization of S and N reserves for seed filling of winter oilseed rape modulated by sulphate restrictions occurring at different growth stages?
title_sort is the remobilization of s and n reserves for seed filling of winter oilseed rape modulated by sulphate restrictions occurring at different growth stages?
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2955745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20693411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq233
work_keys_str_mv AT duboussetl istheremobilizationofsandnreservesforseedfillingofwinteroilseedrapemodulatedbysulphaterestrictionsoccurringatdifferentgrowthstages
AT etiennep istheremobilizationofsandnreservesforseedfillingofwinteroilseedrapemodulatedbysulphaterestrictionsoccurringatdifferentgrowthstages
AT avicejc istheremobilizationofsandnreservesforseedfillingofwinteroilseedrapemodulatedbysulphaterestrictionsoccurringatdifferentgrowthstages