Cargando…

Molecular Modeling of Peroxidase and Polyphenol Oxidase: Substrate Specificity and Active Site Comparison

Peroxidases (POD) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) are enzymes that are well known to be involved in the enzymatic browning reaction of fruits and vegetables with different catalytic mechanisms. Both enzymes have some common substrates, but each also has its specific substrates. In our computational stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nokthai, Prontipa, Lee, Vannajan Sanghiran, Shank, Lalida
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2956093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20957092
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms11093266
_version_ 1782188113185996800
author Nokthai, Prontipa
Lee, Vannajan Sanghiran
Shank, Lalida
author_facet Nokthai, Prontipa
Lee, Vannajan Sanghiran
Shank, Lalida
author_sort Nokthai, Prontipa
collection PubMed
description Peroxidases (POD) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) are enzymes that are well known to be involved in the enzymatic browning reaction of fruits and vegetables with different catalytic mechanisms. Both enzymes have some common substrates, but each also has its specific substrates. In our computational study, the amino acid sequence of grape peroxidase (ABX) was used for the construction of models employing homology modeling method based on the X-ray structure of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase from pea (PDB ID:1APX), whereas the model of grape polyphenol oxidase was obtained directly from the available X-ray structure (PDB ID:2P3X). Molecular docking of common substrates of these two enzymes was subsequently studied. It was found that epicatechin and catechin exhibited high affinity with both enzymes, even though POD and PPO have different binding pockets regarding the size and the key amino acids involved in binding. Predicted binding modes of substrates with both enzymes were also compared. The calculated docking interaction energy of trihydroxybenzoic acid related compounds shows high affinity, suggesting specificity and potential use as common inhibitor to grape ascorbate peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase.
format Text
id pubmed-2956093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29560932010-10-18 Molecular Modeling of Peroxidase and Polyphenol Oxidase: Substrate Specificity and Active Site Comparison Nokthai, Prontipa Lee, Vannajan Sanghiran Shank, Lalida Int J Mol Sci Article Peroxidases (POD) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) are enzymes that are well known to be involved in the enzymatic browning reaction of fruits and vegetables with different catalytic mechanisms. Both enzymes have some common substrates, but each also has its specific substrates. In our computational study, the amino acid sequence of grape peroxidase (ABX) was used for the construction of models employing homology modeling method based on the X-ray structure of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase from pea (PDB ID:1APX), whereas the model of grape polyphenol oxidase was obtained directly from the available X-ray structure (PDB ID:2P3X). Molecular docking of common substrates of these two enzymes was subsequently studied. It was found that epicatechin and catechin exhibited high affinity with both enzymes, even though POD and PPO have different binding pockets regarding the size and the key amino acids involved in binding. Predicted binding modes of substrates with both enzymes were also compared. The calculated docking interaction energy of trihydroxybenzoic acid related compounds shows high affinity, suggesting specificity and potential use as common inhibitor to grape ascorbate peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2010-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC2956093/ /pubmed/20957092 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms11093266 Text en © 2010 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nokthai, Prontipa
Lee, Vannajan Sanghiran
Shank, Lalida
Molecular Modeling of Peroxidase and Polyphenol Oxidase: Substrate Specificity and Active Site Comparison
title Molecular Modeling of Peroxidase and Polyphenol Oxidase: Substrate Specificity and Active Site Comparison
title_full Molecular Modeling of Peroxidase and Polyphenol Oxidase: Substrate Specificity and Active Site Comparison
title_fullStr Molecular Modeling of Peroxidase and Polyphenol Oxidase: Substrate Specificity and Active Site Comparison
title_full_unstemmed Molecular Modeling of Peroxidase and Polyphenol Oxidase: Substrate Specificity and Active Site Comparison
title_short Molecular Modeling of Peroxidase and Polyphenol Oxidase: Substrate Specificity and Active Site Comparison
title_sort molecular modeling of peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase: substrate specificity and active site comparison
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2956093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20957092
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms11093266
work_keys_str_mv AT nokthaiprontipa molecularmodelingofperoxidaseandpolyphenoloxidasesubstratespecificityandactivesitecomparison
AT leevannajansanghiran molecularmodelingofperoxidaseandpolyphenoloxidasesubstratespecificityandactivesitecomparison
AT shanklalida molecularmodelingofperoxidaseandpolyphenoloxidasesubstratespecificityandactivesitecomparison