Cargando…

In Silico Prediction of Estrogen Receptor Subtype Binding Affinity and Selectivity Using Statistical Methods and Molecular Docking with 2-Arylnaphthalenes and 2-Arylquinolines

Over the years development of selective estrogen receptor (ER) ligands has been of great concern to researchers involved in the chemistry and pharmacology of anticancer drugs, resulting in numerous synthesized selective ER subtype inhibitors. In this work, a data set of 82 ER ligands with ERα and ER...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zhizhong, Li, Yan, Ai, Chunzhi, Wang, Yonghua
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2956105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20957105
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms11093434
_version_ 1782188116060143616
author Wang, Zhizhong
Li, Yan
Ai, Chunzhi
Wang, Yonghua
author_facet Wang, Zhizhong
Li, Yan
Ai, Chunzhi
Wang, Yonghua
author_sort Wang, Zhizhong
collection PubMed
description Over the years development of selective estrogen receptor (ER) ligands has been of great concern to researchers involved in the chemistry and pharmacology of anticancer drugs, resulting in numerous synthesized selective ER subtype inhibitors. In this work, a data set of 82 ER ligands with ERα and ERβ inhibitory activities was built, and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) methods based on the two linear (multiple linear regression, MLR, partial least squares regression, PLSR) and a nonlinear statistical method (Bayesian regularized neural network, BRNN) were applied to investigate the potential relationship of molecular structural features related to the activity and selectivity of these ligands. For ERα and ERβ, the performances of the MLR and PLSR models are superior to the BRNN model, giving more reasonable statistical properties (ERα: for MLR, R(tr)(2) = 0.72, Q(te)(2) = 0.63; for PLSR, R(tr)(2) = 0.92, Q(te)(2) = 0.84. ERβ: for MLR, R(tr)(2) = 0.75, Q(te)(2) = 0.75; for PLSR, R(tr)(2) = 0.98, Q(te)(2) = 0.80). The MLR method is also more powerful than other two methods for generating the subtype selectivity models, resulting in R(tr)(2) = 0.74 and Q(te)(2) = 0.80. In addition, the molecular docking method was also used to explore the possible binding modes of the ligands and a relationship between the 3D-binding modes and the 2D-molecular structural features of ligands was further explored. The results show that the binding affinity strength for both ERα and ERβ is more correlated with the atom fragment type, polarity, electronegativites and hydrophobicity. The substitutent in position 8 of the naphthalene or the quinoline plane and the space orientation of these two planes contribute the most to the subtype selectivity on the basis of similar hydrogen bond interactions between binding ligands and both ER subtypes. The QSAR models built together with the docking procedure should be of great advantage for screening and designing ER ligands with improved affinity and subtype selectivity property.
format Text
id pubmed-2956105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29561052010-10-18 In Silico Prediction of Estrogen Receptor Subtype Binding Affinity and Selectivity Using Statistical Methods and Molecular Docking with 2-Arylnaphthalenes and 2-Arylquinolines Wang, Zhizhong Li, Yan Ai, Chunzhi Wang, Yonghua Int J Mol Sci Article Over the years development of selective estrogen receptor (ER) ligands has been of great concern to researchers involved in the chemistry and pharmacology of anticancer drugs, resulting in numerous synthesized selective ER subtype inhibitors. In this work, a data set of 82 ER ligands with ERα and ERβ inhibitory activities was built, and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) methods based on the two linear (multiple linear regression, MLR, partial least squares regression, PLSR) and a nonlinear statistical method (Bayesian regularized neural network, BRNN) were applied to investigate the potential relationship of molecular structural features related to the activity and selectivity of these ligands. For ERα and ERβ, the performances of the MLR and PLSR models are superior to the BRNN model, giving more reasonable statistical properties (ERα: for MLR, R(tr)(2) = 0.72, Q(te)(2) = 0.63; for PLSR, R(tr)(2) = 0.92, Q(te)(2) = 0.84. ERβ: for MLR, R(tr)(2) = 0.75, Q(te)(2) = 0.75; for PLSR, R(tr)(2) = 0.98, Q(te)(2) = 0.80). The MLR method is also more powerful than other two methods for generating the subtype selectivity models, resulting in R(tr)(2) = 0.74 and Q(te)(2) = 0.80. In addition, the molecular docking method was also used to explore the possible binding modes of the ligands and a relationship between the 3D-binding modes and the 2D-molecular structural features of ligands was further explored. The results show that the binding affinity strength for both ERα and ERβ is more correlated with the atom fragment type, polarity, electronegativites and hydrophobicity. The substitutent in position 8 of the naphthalene or the quinoline plane and the space orientation of these two planes contribute the most to the subtype selectivity on the basis of similar hydrogen bond interactions between binding ligands and both ER subtypes. The QSAR models built together with the docking procedure should be of great advantage for screening and designing ER ligands with improved affinity and subtype selectivity property. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2010-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC2956105/ /pubmed/20957105 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms11093434 Text en © 2010 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Zhizhong
Li, Yan
Ai, Chunzhi
Wang, Yonghua
In Silico Prediction of Estrogen Receptor Subtype Binding Affinity and Selectivity Using Statistical Methods and Molecular Docking with 2-Arylnaphthalenes and 2-Arylquinolines
title In Silico Prediction of Estrogen Receptor Subtype Binding Affinity and Selectivity Using Statistical Methods and Molecular Docking with 2-Arylnaphthalenes and 2-Arylquinolines
title_full In Silico Prediction of Estrogen Receptor Subtype Binding Affinity and Selectivity Using Statistical Methods and Molecular Docking with 2-Arylnaphthalenes and 2-Arylquinolines
title_fullStr In Silico Prediction of Estrogen Receptor Subtype Binding Affinity and Selectivity Using Statistical Methods and Molecular Docking with 2-Arylnaphthalenes and 2-Arylquinolines
title_full_unstemmed In Silico Prediction of Estrogen Receptor Subtype Binding Affinity and Selectivity Using Statistical Methods and Molecular Docking with 2-Arylnaphthalenes and 2-Arylquinolines
title_short In Silico Prediction of Estrogen Receptor Subtype Binding Affinity and Selectivity Using Statistical Methods and Molecular Docking with 2-Arylnaphthalenes and 2-Arylquinolines
title_sort in silico prediction of estrogen receptor subtype binding affinity and selectivity using statistical methods and molecular docking with 2-arylnaphthalenes and 2-arylquinolines
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2956105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20957105
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms11093434
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzhizhong insilicopredictionofestrogenreceptorsubtypebindingaffinityandselectivityusingstatisticalmethodsandmoleculardockingwith2arylnaphthalenesand2arylquinolines
AT liyan insilicopredictionofestrogenreceptorsubtypebindingaffinityandselectivityusingstatisticalmethodsandmoleculardockingwith2arylnaphthalenesand2arylquinolines
AT aichunzhi insilicopredictionofestrogenreceptorsubtypebindingaffinityandselectivityusingstatisticalmethodsandmoleculardockingwith2arylnaphthalenesand2arylquinolines
AT wangyonghua insilicopredictionofestrogenreceptorsubtypebindingaffinityandselectivityusingstatisticalmethodsandmoleculardockingwith2arylnaphthalenesand2arylquinolines