Cargando…
Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: During the last decade, the Internet has become increasingly popular and is now an important part of our daily life. When new “Web 2.0” technologies are used in health care, the terms “Health 2.0" or "Medicine 2.0” may be used. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to identify unique de...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Gunther Eysenbach
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2956229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20542857 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1350 |
_version_ | 1782188126711578624 |
---|---|
author | Van De Belt, Tom H Engelen, Lucien JLPG Berben, Sivera AA Schoonhoven, Lisette |
author_facet | Van De Belt, Tom H Engelen, Lucien JLPG Berben, Sivera AA Schoonhoven, Lisette |
author_sort | Van De Belt, Tom H |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During the last decade, the Internet has become increasingly popular and is now an important part of our daily life. When new “Web 2.0” technologies are used in health care, the terms “Health 2.0" or "Medicine 2.0” may be used. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to identify unique definitions of Health 2.0/Medicine 2.0 and recurrent topics within the definitions. METHODS: A systematic literature review of electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL) and gray literature on the Internet using the search engines Google, Bing, and Yahoo was performed to find unique definitions of Health 2.0/Medicine 2.0. We assessed all literature, extracted unique definitions, and selected recurrent topics by using the constant comparison method. RESULTS: We found a total of 1937 articles, 533 in scientific databases and 1404 in the gray literature. We selected 46 unique definitions for further analysis and identified 7 main topics. CONCLUSIONS: Health 2.0/Medicine 2.0 are still developing areas. Many articles concerning this subject were found, primarily on the Internet. However, there is still no general consensus regarding the definition of Health 2.0/Medicine 2.0. We hope that this study will contribute to building the concept of Health 2.0/Medicine 2.0 and facilitate discussion and further research. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2956229 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Gunther Eysenbach |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29562292010-10-18 Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: A Systematic Review Van De Belt, Tom H Engelen, Lucien JLPG Berben, Sivera AA Schoonhoven, Lisette J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: During the last decade, the Internet has become increasingly popular and is now an important part of our daily life. When new “Web 2.0” technologies are used in health care, the terms “Health 2.0" or "Medicine 2.0” may be used. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to identify unique definitions of Health 2.0/Medicine 2.0 and recurrent topics within the definitions. METHODS: A systematic literature review of electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL) and gray literature on the Internet using the search engines Google, Bing, and Yahoo was performed to find unique definitions of Health 2.0/Medicine 2.0. We assessed all literature, extracted unique definitions, and selected recurrent topics by using the constant comparison method. RESULTS: We found a total of 1937 articles, 533 in scientific databases and 1404 in the gray literature. We selected 46 unique definitions for further analysis and identified 7 main topics. CONCLUSIONS: Health 2.0/Medicine 2.0 are still developing areas. Many articles concerning this subject were found, primarily on the Internet. However, there is still no general consensus regarding the definition of Health 2.0/Medicine 2.0. We hope that this study will contribute to building the concept of Health 2.0/Medicine 2.0 and facilitate discussion and further research. Gunther Eysenbach 2010-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2956229/ /pubmed/20542857 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1350 Text en ©Tom H Van De Belt, Lucien JLPG Engelen, Sivera AA Berben, Lisette Schoonhoven. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 11.06.2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Van De Belt, Tom H Engelen, Lucien JLPG Berben, Sivera AA Schoonhoven, Lisette Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: A Systematic Review |
title | Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | definition of health 2.0 and medicine 2.0: a systematic review |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2956229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20542857 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1350 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandebelttomh definitionofhealth20andmedicine20asystematicreview AT engelenlucienjlpg definitionofhealth20andmedicine20asystematicreview AT berbensiveraaa definitionofhealth20andmedicine20asystematicreview AT schoonhovenlisette definitionofhealth20andmedicine20asystematicreview |