Cargando…
Review of Online Evidence-based Practice Point-of-Care Information Summary Providers: Authors’ Reply to the Response by the Publisher of DynaMed
We are pleased that the publisher of DynaMed clarified his evidence-based methodology in response to our review. We stress again how good reporting is a prerequisite for transparency. This lesson comes from the reporting of research findings but its extension to the development of information source...
Autores principales: | Banzi, Rita, Liberati, Alessandro, Moschetti, Ivan, Tagliabue, Ludovica, Moja, Lorenzo |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Gunther Eysenbach
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2956335/ http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1626 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A Review of Online Evidence-based Practice Point-of-Care Information Summary Providers
por: Banzi, Rita, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Speed of updating online evidence based point of care summaries: prospective cohort analysis
por: Banzi, Rita, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Review of Online Evidence-based Practice Point-of-Care Information Summary Providers: Response by the Publisher of DynaMed
por: Alper, Brian S
Publicado: (2010) -
Providing Doctors With High-Quality Information: An Updated Evaluation of Web-Based Point-of-Care Information Summaries
por: Kwag, Koren Hyogene, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
UpToDate versus DynaMed: a cross-sectional study comparing the speed and accuracy of two point-of-care information tools
por: Bradley-Ridout, Glyneva, et al.
Publicado: (2021)