Cargando…

Oral sucrose as an analgesic drug for procedural pain in newborn infants: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Many infants admitted to hospital undergo repeated invasive procedures. Oral sucrose is frequently given to relieve procedural pain in neonates on the basis of its effect on behavioural and physiological pain scores. We assessed whether sucrose administration reduces pain-specific brain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slater, Rebeccah, Cornelissen, Laura, Fabrizi, Lorenzo, Patten, Debbie, Yoxen, Jan, Worley, Alan, Boyd, Stewart, Meek, Judith, Fitzgerald, Maria
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lancet Publishing Group 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2958259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20817247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61303-7
_version_ 1782188312187895808
author Slater, Rebeccah
Cornelissen, Laura
Fabrizi, Lorenzo
Patten, Debbie
Yoxen, Jan
Worley, Alan
Boyd, Stewart
Meek, Judith
Fitzgerald, Maria
author_facet Slater, Rebeccah
Cornelissen, Laura
Fabrizi, Lorenzo
Patten, Debbie
Yoxen, Jan
Worley, Alan
Boyd, Stewart
Meek, Judith
Fitzgerald, Maria
author_sort Slater, Rebeccah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many infants admitted to hospital undergo repeated invasive procedures. Oral sucrose is frequently given to relieve procedural pain in neonates on the basis of its effect on behavioural and physiological pain scores. We assessed whether sucrose administration reduces pain-specific brain and spinal cord activity after an acute noxious procedure in newborn infants. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomised controlled trial, 59 newborn infants at University College Hospital (London, UK) were randomly assigned to receive 0·5 mL 24% sucrose solution or 0·5 mL sterile water 2 min before undergoing a clinically required heel lance. Randomisation was by a computer-generated randomisation code, and researchers, clinicians, participants, and parents were masked to the identity of the solutions. The primary outcome was pain-specific brain activity evoked by one time-locked heel lance, recorded with electroencephalography and identified by principal component analysis. Secondary measures were baseline behavioural and physiological measures, observational pain scores (PIPP), and spinal nociceptive reflex withdrawal activity. Data were analysed per protocol. This study is registered, number ISRCTN78390996. FINDINGS: 29 infants were assigned to receive sucrose and 30 to sterilised water; 20 and 24 infants, respectively, were included in the analysis of the primary outcome measure. Nociceptive brain activity after the noxious heel lance did not differ significantly between infants who received sucrose and those who received sterile water (sucrose: mean 0·10, 95% CI 0·04–0·16; sterile water: mean 0·08, 0·04–0·12; p=0·46). No significant difference was recorded between the sucrose and sterile water groups in the magnitude or latency of the spinal nociceptive reflex withdrawal recorded from the biceps femoris of the stimulated leg. The PIPP score was significantly lower in infants given sucrose than in those given sterile water (mean 5·8, 95% CI 3·7–7·8 vs 8·5, 7·3–9·8; p=0·02) and significantly more infants had no change in facial expression after sucrose administration (seven of 20 [35%] vs none of 24; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Our data suggest that oral sucrose does not significantly affect activity in neonatal brain or spinal cord nociceptive circuits, and therefore might not be an effective analgesic drug. The ability of sucrose to reduce clinical observational scores after noxious events in newborn infants should not be interpreted as pain relief. FUNDING: Medical Research Council.
format Text
id pubmed-2958259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Lancet Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29582592010-11-08 Oral sucrose as an analgesic drug for procedural pain in newborn infants: a randomised controlled trial Slater, Rebeccah Cornelissen, Laura Fabrizi, Lorenzo Patten, Debbie Yoxen, Jan Worley, Alan Boyd, Stewart Meek, Judith Fitzgerald, Maria Lancet Fast track — Articles BACKGROUND: Many infants admitted to hospital undergo repeated invasive procedures. Oral sucrose is frequently given to relieve procedural pain in neonates on the basis of its effect on behavioural and physiological pain scores. We assessed whether sucrose administration reduces pain-specific brain and spinal cord activity after an acute noxious procedure in newborn infants. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomised controlled trial, 59 newborn infants at University College Hospital (London, UK) were randomly assigned to receive 0·5 mL 24% sucrose solution or 0·5 mL sterile water 2 min before undergoing a clinically required heel lance. Randomisation was by a computer-generated randomisation code, and researchers, clinicians, participants, and parents were masked to the identity of the solutions. The primary outcome was pain-specific brain activity evoked by one time-locked heel lance, recorded with electroencephalography and identified by principal component analysis. Secondary measures were baseline behavioural and physiological measures, observational pain scores (PIPP), and spinal nociceptive reflex withdrawal activity. Data were analysed per protocol. This study is registered, number ISRCTN78390996. FINDINGS: 29 infants were assigned to receive sucrose and 30 to sterilised water; 20 and 24 infants, respectively, were included in the analysis of the primary outcome measure. Nociceptive brain activity after the noxious heel lance did not differ significantly between infants who received sucrose and those who received sterile water (sucrose: mean 0·10, 95% CI 0·04–0·16; sterile water: mean 0·08, 0·04–0·12; p=0·46). No significant difference was recorded between the sucrose and sterile water groups in the magnitude or latency of the spinal nociceptive reflex withdrawal recorded from the biceps femoris of the stimulated leg. The PIPP score was significantly lower in infants given sucrose than in those given sterile water (mean 5·8, 95% CI 3·7–7·8 vs 8·5, 7·3–9·8; p=0·02) and significantly more infants had no change in facial expression after sucrose administration (seven of 20 [35%] vs none of 24; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Our data suggest that oral sucrose does not significantly affect activity in neonatal brain or spinal cord nociceptive circuits, and therefore might not be an effective analgesic drug. The ability of sucrose to reduce clinical observational scores after noxious events in newborn infants should not be interpreted as pain relief. FUNDING: Medical Research Council. Lancet Publishing Group 2010-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2958259/ /pubmed/20817247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61303-7 Text en © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions (http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authorsview.authors/supplementalterms1.0) .
spellingShingle Fast track — Articles
Slater, Rebeccah
Cornelissen, Laura
Fabrizi, Lorenzo
Patten, Debbie
Yoxen, Jan
Worley, Alan
Boyd, Stewart
Meek, Judith
Fitzgerald, Maria
Oral sucrose as an analgesic drug for procedural pain in newborn infants: a randomised controlled trial
title Oral sucrose as an analgesic drug for procedural pain in newborn infants: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Oral sucrose as an analgesic drug for procedural pain in newborn infants: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Oral sucrose as an analgesic drug for procedural pain in newborn infants: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Oral sucrose as an analgesic drug for procedural pain in newborn infants: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Oral sucrose as an analgesic drug for procedural pain in newborn infants: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort oral sucrose as an analgesic drug for procedural pain in newborn infants: a randomised controlled trial
topic Fast track — Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2958259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20817247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61303-7
work_keys_str_mv AT slaterrebeccah oralsucroseasananalgesicdrugforproceduralpaininnewborninfantsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cornelissenlaura oralsucroseasananalgesicdrugforproceduralpaininnewborninfantsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fabrizilorenzo oralsucroseasananalgesicdrugforproceduralpaininnewborninfantsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pattendebbie oralsucroseasananalgesicdrugforproceduralpaininnewborninfantsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT yoxenjan oralsucroseasananalgesicdrugforproceduralpaininnewborninfantsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT worleyalan oralsucroseasananalgesicdrugforproceduralpaininnewborninfantsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT boydstewart oralsucroseasananalgesicdrugforproceduralpaininnewborninfantsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT meekjudith oralsucroseasananalgesicdrugforproceduralpaininnewborninfantsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fitzgeraldmaria oralsucroseasananalgesicdrugforproceduralpaininnewborninfantsarandomisedcontrolledtrial