Cargando…
Profile of Acute Infectious Markers in Sporadic Hepatitis E
Laboratory diagnosis of acute infection of hepatitis E virus (HEV) is commonly based on the detection of HEV RNA, IgM and/or rising IgG levels. However, the profile of these markers when the patients present have not been well determined. To clarify the extent of misdiagnosed sporadic hepatitis E in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2958841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21042408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013560 |
_version_ | 1782188380348481536 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Shoujie Zhang, Xuefeng Jiang, Hanmin Yan, Qiang Ai, Xing Wang, Yijun Cai, Jiaping Jiang, Lang Wu, Ting Wang, Zhongze Guan, Li Shih, J. Wai Kuo Ng, Mun-Hon Zhu, Fengcai Zhang, Jun Xia, Ningshao |
author_facet | Huang, Shoujie Zhang, Xuefeng Jiang, Hanmin Yan, Qiang Ai, Xing Wang, Yijun Cai, Jiaping Jiang, Lang Wu, Ting Wang, Zhongze Guan, Li Shih, J. Wai Kuo Ng, Mun-Hon Zhu, Fengcai Zhang, Jun Xia, Ningshao |
author_sort | Huang, Shoujie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Laboratory diagnosis of acute infection of hepatitis E virus (HEV) is commonly based on the detection of HEV RNA, IgM and/or rising IgG levels. However, the profile of these markers when the patients present have not been well determined. To clarify the extent of misdiagnosed sporadic hepatitis E in the initial laboratory detection, serial sera of 271 sporadic acute hepatitis cases were collected, detected and the dynamics of each acute marker during the illness course were analyzed. 91 confirmed cases of hepatitis E were identified based on the presentation of HEV RNA, IgM or at least 4 fold rising of IgG levels. 21 (23.1%) hepatitis E cases were false negative for the viral RNA and 40 (44.0%) for rising IgG, because occurrence of these markers were confined to acute phase of infection and viremia had already subsided and antibody level peaked when these patients presented. IgM was detected in 82 (90.1%) cases. It is the most prevalent of the three markers, because the antibody persisted until early convalescence. Nine cases negative for IgM were positive for rising IgG and one was also positive for the viral RNA; all of these nine cases showed high avid IgG in their acute phase sera, which indicated re-infection. In summary, it is not practicable to determine the true occurrence of sporadic hepatitis E. Nevertheless, it could be closely approximated by approach using a combination of all three acute markers. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2958841 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29588412010-11-01 Profile of Acute Infectious Markers in Sporadic Hepatitis E Huang, Shoujie Zhang, Xuefeng Jiang, Hanmin Yan, Qiang Ai, Xing Wang, Yijun Cai, Jiaping Jiang, Lang Wu, Ting Wang, Zhongze Guan, Li Shih, J. Wai Kuo Ng, Mun-Hon Zhu, Fengcai Zhang, Jun Xia, Ningshao PLoS One Research Article Laboratory diagnosis of acute infection of hepatitis E virus (HEV) is commonly based on the detection of HEV RNA, IgM and/or rising IgG levels. However, the profile of these markers when the patients present have not been well determined. To clarify the extent of misdiagnosed sporadic hepatitis E in the initial laboratory detection, serial sera of 271 sporadic acute hepatitis cases were collected, detected and the dynamics of each acute marker during the illness course were analyzed. 91 confirmed cases of hepatitis E were identified based on the presentation of HEV RNA, IgM or at least 4 fold rising of IgG levels. 21 (23.1%) hepatitis E cases were false negative for the viral RNA and 40 (44.0%) for rising IgG, because occurrence of these markers were confined to acute phase of infection and viremia had already subsided and antibody level peaked when these patients presented. IgM was detected in 82 (90.1%) cases. It is the most prevalent of the three markers, because the antibody persisted until early convalescence. Nine cases negative for IgM were positive for rising IgG and one was also positive for the viral RNA; all of these nine cases showed high avid IgG in their acute phase sera, which indicated re-infection. In summary, it is not practicable to determine the true occurrence of sporadic hepatitis E. Nevertheless, it could be closely approximated by approach using a combination of all three acute markers. Public Library of Science 2010-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2958841/ /pubmed/21042408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013560 Text en Huang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Huang, Shoujie Zhang, Xuefeng Jiang, Hanmin Yan, Qiang Ai, Xing Wang, Yijun Cai, Jiaping Jiang, Lang Wu, Ting Wang, Zhongze Guan, Li Shih, J. Wai Kuo Ng, Mun-Hon Zhu, Fengcai Zhang, Jun Xia, Ningshao Profile of Acute Infectious Markers in Sporadic Hepatitis E |
title | Profile of Acute Infectious Markers in Sporadic Hepatitis E |
title_full | Profile of Acute Infectious Markers in Sporadic Hepatitis E |
title_fullStr | Profile of Acute Infectious Markers in Sporadic Hepatitis E |
title_full_unstemmed | Profile of Acute Infectious Markers in Sporadic Hepatitis E |
title_short | Profile of Acute Infectious Markers in Sporadic Hepatitis E |
title_sort | profile of acute infectious markers in sporadic hepatitis e |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2958841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21042408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013560 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangshoujie profileofacuteinfectiousmarkersinsporadichepatitise AT zhangxuefeng profileofacuteinfectiousmarkersinsporadichepatitise AT jianghanmin profileofacuteinfectiousmarkersinsporadichepatitise AT yanqiang profileofacuteinfectiousmarkersinsporadichepatitise AT aixing profileofacuteinfectiousmarkersinsporadichepatitise AT wangyijun profileofacuteinfectiousmarkersinsporadichepatitise AT caijiaping profileofacuteinfectiousmarkersinsporadichepatitise AT jianglang profileofacuteinfectiousmarkersinsporadichepatitise AT wuting profileofacuteinfectiousmarkersinsporadichepatitise AT wangzhongze profileofacuteinfectiousmarkersinsporadichepatitise AT guanli profileofacuteinfectiousmarkersinsporadichepatitise AT shihjwaikuo profileofacuteinfectiousmarkersinsporadichepatitise AT ngmunhon profileofacuteinfectiousmarkersinsporadichepatitise AT zhufengcai profileofacuteinfectiousmarkersinsporadichepatitise AT zhangjun profileofacuteinfectiousmarkersinsporadichepatitise AT xianingshao profileofacuteinfectiousmarkersinsporadichepatitise |