Cargando…

Prediction of global left ventricular functional recovery in patients with heart failure undergoing surgical revascularisation, based on late gadolinium enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

BACKGROUND: The new gold standard for myocardial viability assessment is late gadolinium enhancement-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR); this technique has demonstrated that the transmural extent of scar predicts segmental functional recovery. We now asked how the number of viable and numbe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pegg, Tammy J, Selvanayagam, Joseph B, Jennifer, Joslin, Francis, Jane M, Karamitsos, Theodoros D, Dall'Armellina, Erica, Smith, Karen L, Taggart, David P, Neubauer, Stefan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2959056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20929540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-56
_version_ 1782188429534035968
author Pegg, Tammy J
Selvanayagam, Joseph B
Jennifer, Joslin
Francis, Jane M
Karamitsos, Theodoros D
Dall'Armellina, Erica
Smith, Karen L
Taggart, David P
Neubauer, Stefan
author_facet Pegg, Tammy J
Selvanayagam, Joseph B
Jennifer, Joslin
Francis, Jane M
Karamitsos, Theodoros D
Dall'Armellina, Erica
Smith, Karen L
Taggart, David P
Neubauer, Stefan
author_sort Pegg, Tammy J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The new gold standard for myocardial viability assessment is late gadolinium enhancement-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR); this technique has demonstrated that the transmural extent of scar predicts segmental functional recovery. We now asked how the number of viable and number of viable+normal, segments predicted recovery of global left ventricular (LV) function in patients undergoing CABG. Finally, we examined which segmental transmural threshold of scarring best predicted global LV recovery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty patients with reduced LV ejection fraction (EF) referred for CABG were recruited, and 33 included in this analysis. Patients underwent CMR to assess LV function and viability pre-operatively at 6 days and 6 months. Mean LVEF 38% ± 11, which improved to 43% ± 12 after surgery. 21/33 patients improved EF by ≥3% (EF before 38% ± 13, after 47% ± 13), 12/33 did not (EF before 39% ± 6, after 37% ± 8). The only independent predictor for global functional recovery after revascularisation was the number of viable+normal segments: Based on a segmental transmural viability cutoff of <50%, ROC analysis demonstrated ≥10 viable+normal segments predicted ≥3% improvement in LVEF with a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 75% (AUC = 0.9, p < 0.001). Transmural viability cutoffs of <25 and <75% and a cutoff of ≥4 viable segments were less useful predictors of global LV recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a 50% transmural viability cutoff, patients with ≥10 viable+normal segments improve global LV function post revascularisation, while patients with fewer such segments do not. LGE-CMR is a simple and powerful tool for identifying which patients with impaired LV function will benefit from CABG. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Research Ethics Committee Unique Identifier: NRES:05/Q1603/42. The study is listed on the Current Controlled Trials Registry: ISRCTN41388968. URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com
format Text
id pubmed-2959056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29590562010-10-22 Prediction of global left ventricular functional recovery in patients with heart failure undergoing surgical revascularisation, based on late gadolinium enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Pegg, Tammy J Selvanayagam, Joseph B Jennifer, Joslin Francis, Jane M Karamitsos, Theodoros D Dall'Armellina, Erica Smith, Karen L Taggart, David P Neubauer, Stefan J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: The new gold standard for myocardial viability assessment is late gadolinium enhancement-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR); this technique has demonstrated that the transmural extent of scar predicts segmental functional recovery. We now asked how the number of viable and number of viable+normal, segments predicted recovery of global left ventricular (LV) function in patients undergoing CABG. Finally, we examined which segmental transmural threshold of scarring best predicted global LV recovery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty patients with reduced LV ejection fraction (EF) referred for CABG were recruited, and 33 included in this analysis. Patients underwent CMR to assess LV function and viability pre-operatively at 6 days and 6 months. Mean LVEF 38% ± 11, which improved to 43% ± 12 after surgery. 21/33 patients improved EF by ≥3% (EF before 38% ± 13, after 47% ± 13), 12/33 did not (EF before 39% ± 6, after 37% ± 8). The only independent predictor for global functional recovery after revascularisation was the number of viable+normal segments: Based on a segmental transmural viability cutoff of <50%, ROC analysis demonstrated ≥10 viable+normal segments predicted ≥3% improvement in LVEF with a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 75% (AUC = 0.9, p < 0.001). Transmural viability cutoffs of <25 and <75% and a cutoff of ≥4 viable segments were less useful predictors of global LV recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a 50% transmural viability cutoff, patients with ≥10 viable+normal segments improve global LV function post revascularisation, while patients with fewer such segments do not. LGE-CMR is a simple and powerful tool for identifying which patients with impaired LV function will benefit from CABG. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Research Ethics Committee Unique Identifier: NRES:05/Q1603/42. The study is listed on the Current Controlled Trials Registry: ISRCTN41388968. URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com BioMed Central 2010-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2959056/ /pubmed/20929540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-56 Text en Copyright ©2010 Pegg et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Pegg, Tammy J
Selvanayagam, Joseph B
Jennifer, Joslin
Francis, Jane M
Karamitsos, Theodoros D
Dall'Armellina, Erica
Smith, Karen L
Taggart, David P
Neubauer, Stefan
Prediction of global left ventricular functional recovery in patients with heart failure undergoing surgical revascularisation, based on late gadolinium enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
title Prediction of global left ventricular functional recovery in patients with heart failure undergoing surgical revascularisation, based on late gadolinium enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
title_full Prediction of global left ventricular functional recovery in patients with heart failure undergoing surgical revascularisation, based on late gadolinium enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
title_fullStr Prediction of global left ventricular functional recovery in patients with heart failure undergoing surgical revascularisation, based on late gadolinium enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of global left ventricular functional recovery in patients with heart failure undergoing surgical revascularisation, based on late gadolinium enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
title_short Prediction of global left ventricular functional recovery in patients with heart failure undergoing surgical revascularisation, based on late gadolinium enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
title_sort prediction of global left ventricular functional recovery in patients with heart failure undergoing surgical revascularisation, based on late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2959056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20929540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-56
work_keys_str_mv AT peggtammyj predictionofgloballeftventricularfunctionalrecoveryinpatientswithheartfailureundergoingsurgicalrevascularisationbasedonlategadoliniumenhancementcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT selvanayagamjosephb predictionofgloballeftventricularfunctionalrecoveryinpatientswithheartfailureundergoingsurgicalrevascularisationbasedonlategadoliniumenhancementcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT jenniferjoslin predictionofgloballeftventricularfunctionalrecoveryinpatientswithheartfailureundergoingsurgicalrevascularisationbasedonlategadoliniumenhancementcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT francisjanem predictionofgloballeftventricularfunctionalrecoveryinpatientswithheartfailureundergoingsurgicalrevascularisationbasedonlategadoliniumenhancementcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT karamitsostheodorosd predictionofgloballeftventricularfunctionalrecoveryinpatientswithheartfailureundergoingsurgicalrevascularisationbasedonlategadoliniumenhancementcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT dallarmellinaerica predictionofgloballeftventricularfunctionalrecoveryinpatientswithheartfailureundergoingsurgicalrevascularisationbasedonlategadoliniumenhancementcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT smithkarenl predictionofgloballeftventricularfunctionalrecoveryinpatientswithheartfailureundergoingsurgicalrevascularisationbasedonlategadoliniumenhancementcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT taggartdavidp predictionofgloballeftventricularfunctionalrecoveryinpatientswithheartfailureundergoingsurgicalrevascularisationbasedonlategadoliniumenhancementcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT neubauerstefan predictionofgloballeftventricularfunctionalrecoveryinpatientswithheartfailureundergoingsurgicalrevascularisationbasedonlategadoliniumenhancementcardiovascularmagneticresonance