Cargando…

Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses: the application of minimal important difference units

Systematic reviews of randomized trials that include measurements of health-related quality of life potentially provide critical information for patient and clinicians facing challenging health care decisions. When, as is most often the case, individual randomized trials use different measurement in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Johnston, Bradley C, Thorlund, Kristian, Schünemann, Holger J, Xie, Feng, Murad, Mohammad Hassan, Montori, Victor M, Guyatt, Gordon H
Formato:	Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2010
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2959099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20937092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-116

Ejemplares similares

Patient-reported outcomes in meta-analyses --Part 2: methods for improving interpretability for decision-makers
por: Johnston, Bradley C, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

How a well-grounded minimal important difference can enhance transparency of labelling claims and improve interpretation of a patient reported outcome measure
por: Brożek, Jan L, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Minimally important difference estimates and methods: a protocol
por: Johnston, Bradley C, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Interpreting the results of patient reported outcome measures in clinical trials: The clinician's perspective
por: Schünemann, Holger J, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Patient-reported outcomes in meta-analyses – Part 1: assessing risk of bias and combining outcomes
por: Johnston, Bradley C, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

A Decision Aid for COPD patients considering inhaled steroid therapy: development and before and after pilot testing
por: Akl, Elie A, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Combining scores from different patient reported outcome measures in meta-analyses: when is it justified?
por: Puhan, Milo A, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Importance of evidence-based medicine on research and practice
por: Kamath, Sriganesh, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
por: Langendam, Miranda W, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Approaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses
por: Mbuagbaw, L., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The minimal important difference of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
por: Puhan, Milo A, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Interpreting discordant indirect and multiple treatment comparison meta-analyses: an evaluation of direct acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C infection
por: Druyts, Eric, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect
por: Murad, M Hassan, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study
por: Devji, Tahira, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Ageism vs the technical imperative, applying the GRADE framework to the evidence on hemodialysis in very elderly patients
por: Thorsteinsdottir, Bjorg, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Tips for Teachers of Evidence-Based Medicine: Adjusting for Prognostic Imbalances (Confounding Variables) in Studies on Therapy or Harm
por: Kennedy, Cassie C., et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Presentation approaches for enhancing interpretability of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in meta-analysis: a protocol for a systematic survey of Cochrane reviews
por: Devji, Tahira, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Multiple secondary outcome analyses: precise interpretation is important
por: Parker, Richard A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 6. Determining which outcomes are important
por: Schünemann, Holger J, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Evolution of Heterogeneity (I(2)) Estimates and Their 95% Confidence Intervals in Large Meta-Analyses
por: Thorlund, Kristian, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Defining certainty of net benefit: a GRADE concept paper
por: Alper, Brian S, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Interpreting meta-analysis according to the adequacy of sample size. An example using isoniazid chemoprophylaxis for tuberculosis in purified protein derivative negative HIV-infected individuals
por: Thorlund, Kristian, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Assessment and Implication of Prognostic Imbalance in Randomized Controlled Trials with a Binary Outcome – A Simulation Study
por: Chu, Rong, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Internal consistency reliability is a poor predictor of responsiveness
por: Puhan, Milo A, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

Shared genome analyses of notable listeriosis outbreaks, highlighting the critical importance of epidemiological evidence, input datasets and interpretation criteria
por: Reimer, Aleisha, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses
por: Wetterslev, Jørn, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions
por: Moberg, Jenny, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Assessing baseline dependency of anchor-based minimal important change (MIC): don’t stratify on the baseline score!
por: Terluin, Berend, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Clinically important deep vein thrombosis in the intensive care unit: a survey of intensivists
por: Cook, Deborah, et al.
Publicado: (2004)

Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: the need to present minimal important differences units in meta-analyses
por: Gianola, Silvia, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

False-positive findings in Cochrane meta-analyses with and without application of trial sequential analysis: an empirical review
por: Imberger, Georgina, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The Number of Patients and Events Required to Limit the Risk of Overestimation of Intervention Effects in Meta-Analysis—A Simulation Study
por: Thorlund, Kristian, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Incorporating alternative design clinical trials in network meta-analyses
por: Thorlund, Kristian, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Minimizing control group allocation in randomized trials using dynamic borrowing of external control data – An application to second line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer
por: Dron, Louis, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Low intensity pulsed ultrasonography for fractures: systematic review of randomised controlled trials
por: Busse, Jason W, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Care management for Type 2 diabetes in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Egginton, Jason S, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Characteristics and interpretation of subgroup analyses based on tumour characteristics in randomised trials testing target-specific anticancer drugs: design of a systematic survey
por: Schandelmaier, Stefan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Health Utility Book (HUB)–Cancer: Protocol for a Systematic Literature Review of Health State Utility Values in Cancer
por: Zoratti, Michael James, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Influenza vaccines licensed in the United States in healthy children: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (Protocol)
por: Prutsky, Gabriela J, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Minimally Important Differences for Interpreting EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer
por: Musoro, Jammbe Z, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_jdm64f6ufn81c956ctko8kja83