Cargando…

Type 1 Diabetic Drivers With and Without a History of Recurrent Hypoglycemia–Related Driving Mishaps: Physiological and performance differences during euglycemia and the induction of hypoglycemia

OBJECTIVE: Collisions are more common among drivers with type 1 diabetes than among their nondiabetic spouses. This increased risk appears to be attributable to a subgroup of drivers with type 1 diabetes. The hypothesis tested is that this vulnerable subgroup is more at risk for hypoglycemia and its...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cox, Daniel J., Kovatchev, Boris P., Anderson, Stacey M., Clarke, William L., Gonder-Frederick, Linda A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2963507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20699432
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-2130
_version_ 1782189278613209088
author Cox, Daniel J.
Kovatchev, Boris P.
Anderson, Stacey M.
Clarke, William L.
Gonder-Frederick, Linda A.
author_facet Cox, Daniel J.
Kovatchev, Boris P.
Anderson, Stacey M.
Clarke, William L.
Gonder-Frederick, Linda A.
author_sort Cox, Daniel J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Collisions are more common among drivers with type 1 diabetes than among their nondiabetic spouses. This increased risk appears to be attributable to a subgroup of drivers with type 1 diabetes. The hypothesis tested is that this vulnerable subgroup is more at risk for hypoglycemia and its disruptive effects on driving. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty-eight drivers with type 1 diabetes, 16 with (+history) and 22 without (−history) a recent history of recurrent hypoglycemia-related driving mishaps, drove a virtual reality driving simulator and watched a videotape of someone driving a simulator for 30-min periods. Driving and video testing occurred in a double-blind, randomized, crossover manner during euglycemia (5.5 mmol/l) and progressive hypoglycemia (3.9–2.5 mmol/l). Examiners were blind to which subjects were +/−history, whereas subjects were blind to their blood glucose levels and targets. RESULTS: During euglycemia, +history participants reported more autonomic and neuroglycopenic symptoms (P ≤ 0.01) and tended to require more dextrose infusion to maintain euglycemia with the same insulin infusion (P < 0.09). During progressive hypoglycemia, these subjects demonstrated less epinephrine release (P = 0.02) and greater driving impairments (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the speculation that there is a subgroup of type 1 diabetic drivers more vulnerable to experiencing hypoglycemia-related driving mishaps. This increased vulnerability may be due to more symptom “noise” (more symptoms during euglycemia), making it harder to detect hypoglycemia while driving; possibly greater carbohydrate utilization, rendering them more vulnerable to experiencing hypoglycemia; less hormonal counterregulation, leading to more profound hypoglycemia; and more neuroglycopenia, rendering them more vulnerable to impaired driving.
format Text
id pubmed-2963507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29635072011-11-01 Type 1 Diabetic Drivers With and Without a History of Recurrent Hypoglycemia–Related Driving Mishaps: Physiological and performance differences during euglycemia and the induction of hypoglycemia Cox, Daniel J. Kovatchev, Boris P. Anderson, Stacey M. Clarke, William L. Gonder-Frederick, Linda A. Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: Collisions are more common among drivers with type 1 diabetes than among their nondiabetic spouses. This increased risk appears to be attributable to a subgroup of drivers with type 1 diabetes. The hypothesis tested is that this vulnerable subgroup is more at risk for hypoglycemia and its disruptive effects on driving. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty-eight drivers with type 1 diabetes, 16 with (+history) and 22 without (−history) a recent history of recurrent hypoglycemia-related driving mishaps, drove a virtual reality driving simulator and watched a videotape of someone driving a simulator for 30-min periods. Driving and video testing occurred in a double-blind, randomized, crossover manner during euglycemia (5.5 mmol/l) and progressive hypoglycemia (3.9–2.5 mmol/l). Examiners were blind to which subjects were +/−history, whereas subjects were blind to their blood glucose levels and targets. RESULTS: During euglycemia, +history participants reported more autonomic and neuroglycopenic symptoms (P ≤ 0.01) and tended to require more dextrose infusion to maintain euglycemia with the same insulin infusion (P < 0.09). During progressive hypoglycemia, these subjects demonstrated less epinephrine release (P = 0.02) and greater driving impairments (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the speculation that there is a subgroup of type 1 diabetic drivers more vulnerable to experiencing hypoglycemia-related driving mishaps. This increased vulnerability may be due to more symptom “noise” (more symptoms during euglycemia), making it harder to detect hypoglycemia while driving; possibly greater carbohydrate utilization, rendering them more vulnerable to experiencing hypoglycemia; less hormonal counterregulation, leading to more profound hypoglycemia; and more neuroglycopenia, rendering them more vulnerable to impaired driving. American Diabetes Association 2010-11 2010-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC2963507/ /pubmed/20699432 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-2130 Text en © 2010 by the American Diabetes Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cox, Daniel J.
Kovatchev, Boris P.
Anderson, Stacey M.
Clarke, William L.
Gonder-Frederick, Linda A.
Type 1 Diabetic Drivers With and Without a History of Recurrent Hypoglycemia–Related Driving Mishaps: Physiological and performance differences during euglycemia and the induction of hypoglycemia
title Type 1 Diabetic Drivers With and Without a History of Recurrent Hypoglycemia–Related Driving Mishaps: Physiological and performance differences during euglycemia and the induction of hypoglycemia
title_full Type 1 Diabetic Drivers With and Without a History of Recurrent Hypoglycemia–Related Driving Mishaps: Physiological and performance differences during euglycemia and the induction of hypoglycemia
title_fullStr Type 1 Diabetic Drivers With and Without a History of Recurrent Hypoglycemia–Related Driving Mishaps: Physiological and performance differences during euglycemia and the induction of hypoglycemia
title_full_unstemmed Type 1 Diabetic Drivers With and Without a History of Recurrent Hypoglycemia–Related Driving Mishaps: Physiological and performance differences during euglycemia and the induction of hypoglycemia
title_short Type 1 Diabetic Drivers With and Without a History of Recurrent Hypoglycemia–Related Driving Mishaps: Physiological and performance differences during euglycemia and the induction of hypoglycemia
title_sort type 1 diabetic drivers with and without a history of recurrent hypoglycemia–related driving mishaps: physiological and performance differences during euglycemia and the induction of hypoglycemia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2963507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20699432
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-2130
work_keys_str_mv AT coxdanielj type1diabeticdriverswithandwithoutahistoryofrecurrenthypoglycemiarelateddrivingmishapsphysiologicalandperformancedifferencesduringeuglycemiaandtheinductionofhypoglycemia
AT kovatchevborisp type1diabeticdriverswithandwithoutahistoryofrecurrenthypoglycemiarelateddrivingmishapsphysiologicalandperformancedifferencesduringeuglycemiaandtheinductionofhypoglycemia
AT andersonstaceym type1diabeticdriverswithandwithoutahistoryofrecurrenthypoglycemiarelateddrivingmishapsphysiologicalandperformancedifferencesduringeuglycemiaandtheinductionofhypoglycemia
AT clarkewilliaml type1diabeticdriverswithandwithoutahistoryofrecurrenthypoglycemiarelateddrivingmishapsphysiologicalandperformancedifferencesduringeuglycemiaandtheinductionofhypoglycemia
AT gonderfredericklindaa type1diabeticdriverswithandwithoutahistoryofrecurrenthypoglycemiarelateddrivingmishapsphysiologicalandperformancedifferencesduringeuglycemiaandtheinductionofhypoglycemia