Cargando…

Patient treatment satisfaction after switching to NovoMix(®) 30 (BIAsp 30) in the IMPROVE™ study: an analysis of the influence of prior and current treatment factors

PURPOSE: Understanding treatment satisfaction (TS) for diabetes is increasingly important as treatment options increase. This study examines treatment satisfaction with NovoMix(®) 30 in an observational study in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: The DiabMedSat assesses Overall, Treatment Burde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brod, Meryl, Valensi, Paul, Shaban, Joseph A., Bushnell, Don M., Christensen, Torsten L.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2963740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20602172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9699-0
_version_ 1782189300674199552
author Brod, Meryl
Valensi, Paul
Shaban, Joseph A.
Bushnell, Don M.
Christensen, Torsten L.
author_facet Brod, Meryl
Valensi, Paul
Shaban, Joseph A.
Bushnell, Don M.
Christensen, Torsten L.
author_sort Brod, Meryl
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Understanding treatment satisfaction (TS) for diabetes is increasingly important as treatment options increase. This study examines treatment satisfaction with NovoMix(®) 30 in an observational study in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: The DiabMedSat assesses Overall, Treatment Burden, Symptom and Efficacy Treatment Satisfaction. The impact of type of pretreatment variables on TS was examined by ANOVA at baseline and week 26. Satisfaction at week 26 was examined by t-test and effect size. Linear regression models examined impact of prior treatment factors (age, gender, duration of diabetes, type of prior treatment and diabetes-related comorbidities) and current treatment factors (weight gain, hypoglycemic events, reaching therapeutic goal) on TS. RESULTS: The data set comprised 17,488 persons. Prior treatment with insulin had a more positive impact on baseline satisfaction. At week 26, there were no differences between type of prior treatment groups in Overall, Symptoms and Burden TS. Current treatment with NovoMix 30 significantly improved TS. Regression analyses examining the combined effect of pretreatment factors and current treatment factors found that all factors except for age-impacted TS although the domains impacted varied. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with NovoMix 30 reported improved treatment satisfaction, and the improvement is considered clinically meaningful to patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2963740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29637402010-11-16 Patient treatment satisfaction after switching to NovoMix(®) 30 (BIAsp 30) in the IMPROVE™ study: an analysis of the influence of prior and current treatment factors Brod, Meryl Valensi, Paul Shaban, Joseph A. Bushnell, Don M. Christensen, Torsten L. Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: Understanding treatment satisfaction (TS) for diabetes is increasingly important as treatment options increase. This study examines treatment satisfaction with NovoMix(®) 30 in an observational study in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: The DiabMedSat assesses Overall, Treatment Burden, Symptom and Efficacy Treatment Satisfaction. The impact of type of pretreatment variables on TS was examined by ANOVA at baseline and week 26. Satisfaction at week 26 was examined by t-test and effect size. Linear regression models examined impact of prior treatment factors (age, gender, duration of diabetes, type of prior treatment and diabetes-related comorbidities) and current treatment factors (weight gain, hypoglycemic events, reaching therapeutic goal) on TS. RESULTS: The data set comprised 17,488 persons. Prior treatment with insulin had a more positive impact on baseline satisfaction. At week 26, there were no differences between type of prior treatment groups in Overall, Symptoms and Burden TS. Current treatment with NovoMix 30 significantly improved TS. Regression analyses examining the combined effect of pretreatment factors and current treatment factors found that all factors except for age-impacted TS although the domains impacted varied. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with NovoMix 30 reported improved treatment satisfaction, and the improvement is considered clinically meaningful to patients. Springer Netherlands 2010-07-04 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC2963740/ /pubmed/20602172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9699-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Brod, Meryl
Valensi, Paul
Shaban, Joseph A.
Bushnell, Don M.
Christensen, Torsten L.
Patient treatment satisfaction after switching to NovoMix(®) 30 (BIAsp 30) in the IMPROVE™ study: an analysis of the influence of prior and current treatment factors
title Patient treatment satisfaction after switching to NovoMix(®) 30 (BIAsp 30) in the IMPROVE™ study: an analysis of the influence of prior and current treatment factors
title_full Patient treatment satisfaction after switching to NovoMix(®) 30 (BIAsp 30) in the IMPROVE™ study: an analysis of the influence of prior and current treatment factors
title_fullStr Patient treatment satisfaction after switching to NovoMix(®) 30 (BIAsp 30) in the IMPROVE™ study: an analysis of the influence of prior and current treatment factors
title_full_unstemmed Patient treatment satisfaction after switching to NovoMix(®) 30 (BIAsp 30) in the IMPROVE™ study: an analysis of the influence of prior and current treatment factors
title_short Patient treatment satisfaction after switching to NovoMix(®) 30 (BIAsp 30) in the IMPROVE™ study: an analysis of the influence of prior and current treatment factors
title_sort patient treatment satisfaction after switching to novomix(®) 30 (biasp 30) in the improve™ study: an analysis of the influence of prior and current treatment factors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2963740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20602172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9699-0
work_keys_str_mv AT brodmeryl patienttreatmentsatisfactionafterswitchingtonovomix30biasp30intheimprovestudyananalysisoftheinfluenceofpriorandcurrenttreatmentfactors
AT valensipaul patienttreatmentsatisfactionafterswitchingtonovomix30biasp30intheimprovestudyananalysisoftheinfluenceofpriorandcurrenttreatmentfactors
AT shabanjosepha patienttreatmentsatisfactionafterswitchingtonovomix30biasp30intheimprovestudyananalysisoftheinfluenceofpriorandcurrenttreatmentfactors
AT bushnelldonm patienttreatmentsatisfactionafterswitchingtonovomix30biasp30intheimprovestudyananalysisoftheinfluenceofpriorandcurrenttreatmentfactors
AT christensentorstenl patienttreatmentsatisfactionafterswitchingtonovomix30biasp30intheimprovestudyananalysisoftheinfluenceofpriorandcurrenttreatmentfactors