Cargando…

Prevalence of lower extremity venous duplication

PURPOSE: This retrospective study was performed to determine the prevalence of lower extremity venous duplication using duplex ultrasound in the patient population of a large urban medical center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The reports of all lower extremity venous ultrasound examinations performed at ou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simpson, William L, Krakowsi, David M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2963758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21042454
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.69367
_version_ 1782189305056198656
author Simpson, William L
Krakowsi, David M
author_facet Simpson, William L
Krakowsi, David M
author_sort Simpson, William L
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This retrospective study was performed to determine the prevalence of lower extremity venous duplication using duplex ultrasound in the patient population of a large urban medical center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The reports of all lower extremity venous ultrasound examinations performed at our institution between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2002 were reviewed. Ultrasound examinations that were performed for purposes other than the detection of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis were excluded. The prevalence of duplication and its specific location were recorded. In addition, the prevalence of thrombus and its specific location were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 3118 exams were performed in 2664 patients. Of the 2664 patients, 2311 had only one examination performed during the study period; 353 patients had more than one examination performed. We found that 10.1% of patients (270/2664) had at least one venous segment duplicated and 5.4% of patients (143/2664) had a thrombus in at least one venous segment. There was a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of both duplication and thrombus with a change in venous segment. Only 0.4% of patients (11/2664) had thrombus within a duplicated segment. Of those who had more than one examination performed, 15.3% (54/353) had the same venous segment(s) seen on one examination but not another. CONCLUSION: Lower extremity venous duplication is a frequent anatomic variant that is seen in 10.1% of patients, but it may not be as common as is generally believed. It can result in a false negative result for deep vein thrombosis.
format Text
id pubmed-2963758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29637582010-11-01 Prevalence of lower extremity venous duplication Simpson, William L Krakowsi, David M Indian J Radiol Imaging Vascular PURPOSE: This retrospective study was performed to determine the prevalence of lower extremity venous duplication using duplex ultrasound in the patient population of a large urban medical center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The reports of all lower extremity venous ultrasound examinations performed at our institution between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2002 were reviewed. Ultrasound examinations that were performed for purposes other than the detection of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis were excluded. The prevalence of duplication and its specific location were recorded. In addition, the prevalence of thrombus and its specific location were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 3118 exams were performed in 2664 patients. Of the 2664 patients, 2311 had only one examination performed during the study period; 353 patients had more than one examination performed. We found that 10.1% of patients (270/2664) had at least one venous segment duplicated and 5.4% of patients (143/2664) had a thrombus in at least one venous segment. There was a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of both duplication and thrombus with a change in venous segment. Only 0.4% of patients (11/2664) had thrombus within a duplicated segment. Of those who had more than one examination performed, 15.3% (54/353) had the same venous segment(s) seen on one examination but not another. CONCLUSION: Lower extremity venous duplication is a frequent anatomic variant that is seen in 10.1% of patients, but it may not be as common as is generally believed. It can result in a false negative result for deep vein thrombosis. Medknow Publications 2010-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2963758/ /pubmed/21042454 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.69367 Text en © Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Vascular
Simpson, William L
Krakowsi, David M
Prevalence of lower extremity venous duplication
title Prevalence of lower extremity venous duplication
title_full Prevalence of lower extremity venous duplication
title_fullStr Prevalence of lower extremity venous duplication
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of lower extremity venous duplication
title_short Prevalence of lower extremity venous duplication
title_sort prevalence of lower extremity venous duplication
topic Vascular
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2963758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21042454
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.69367
work_keys_str_mv AT simpsonwilliaml prevalenceoflowerextremityvenousduplication
AT krakowsidavidm prevalenceoflowerextremityvenousduplication