Cargando…

Clinical and Urodynamic Significance of Morphological Differences in Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to evaluate whether morphologic differences correlated with urodynamic and clinical characteristics in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) of trilobar or bilobar adenoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Betwe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Seung Wook, Cho, Jeong Man, Kang, Jung Yoon, Yoo, Tag Keun
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2963782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21031089
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.10.694
_version_ 1782189310932418560
author Lee, Seung Wook
Cho, Jeong Man
Kang, Jung Yoon
Yoo, Tag Keun
author_facet Lee, Seung Wook
Cho, Jeong Man
Kang, Jung Yoon
Yoo, Tag Keun
author_sort Lee, Seung Wook
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to evaluate whether morphologic differences correlated with urodynamic and clinical characteristics in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) of trilobar or bilobar adenoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and June 2009, 72 male patients who had undergone transurethral resection (TUR) owing to BPH with IPP were included in this study. They underwent preoperative urodynamic studies, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)/quality of life (QoL), maximal flow rate (Qmax), post-voiding residual urine volume (PVR), transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement. The patients were classified into 2 groups (the trilobar and bilobar adenoma groups) on the basis of video findings during the TUR operation. RESULTS: The trilobar and bilobar adenoma groups consisted of 37 patients and 35 patients, respectively. The Mean±SD IPP, prostate volume (PV), and transition zone volume of the trilobar and bilobar adenoma groups were 11.8±5.2 mm and 9.0±3.8 mm (p=0.014), 81.1±25.8 g and 59.3±22.5 g (p<0.001), and 49.6±20.6 g and 34.8±19.4 g (p=0.003), respectively. The Mean±SD PSA, bladder contractility index (BCI), and bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI) were 4.6±2.5 ng/ml and 3.5±1.7 ng/ml (p=0.042), 119.8±33.4 and 87.7±24.4 (p<0.001), and 62.6±29.5 and 44.6±20.4 (p=0.005), respectively. There were no significant differences in IPSS/QoL, Qmax, PVR, acute urinary retention, or detrusor overactivity in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: IPP has two morphologic types of trilobar or bilobar enlargement. The PV, BOOI, and BCI were significantly smaller in the bilobar adenoma group than in the trilobar adenoma group.
format Text
id pubmed-2963782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29637822010-10-28 Clinical and Urodynamic Significance of Morphological Differences in Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion Lee, Seung Wook Cho, Jeong Man Kang, Jung Yoon Yoo, Tag Keun Korean J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to evaluate whether morphologic differences correlated with urodynamic and clinical characteristics in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) of trilobar or bilobar adenoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and June 2009, 72 male patients who had undergone transurethral resection (TUR) owing to BPH with IPP were included in this study. They underwent preoperative urodynamic studies, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)/quality of life (QoL), maximal flow rate (Qmax), post-voiding residual urine volume (PVR), transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement. The patients were classified into 2 groups (the trilobar and bilobar adenoma groups) on the basis of video findings during the TUR operation. RESULTS: The trilobar and bilobar adenoma groups consisted of 37 patients and 35 patients, respectively. The Mean±SD IPP, prostate volume (PV), and transition zone volume of the trilobar and bilobar adenoma groups were 11.8±5.2 mm and 9.0±3.8 mm (p=0.014), 81.1±25.8 g and 59.3±22.5 g (p<0.001), and 49.6±20.6 g and 34.8±19.4 g (p=0.003), respectively. The Mean±SD PSA, bladder contractility index (BCI), and bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI) were 4.6±2.5 ng/ml and 3.5±1.7 ng/ml (p=0.042), 119.8±33.4 and 87.7±24.4 (p<0.001), and 62.6±29.5 and 44.6±20.4 (p=0.005), respectively. There were no significant differences in IPSS/QoL, Qmax, PVR, acute urinary retention, or detrusor overactivity in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: IPP has two morphologic types of trilobar or bilobar enlargement. The PV, BOOI, and BCI were significantly smaller in the bilobar adenoma group than in the trilobar adenoma group. The Korean Urological Association 2010-10 2010-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2963782/ /pubmed/21031089 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.10.694 Text en Copyright © The Korean Urological Association, 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Seung Wook
Cho, Jeong Man
Kang, Jung Yoon
Yoo, Tag Keun
Clinical and Urodynamic Significance of Morphological Differences in Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion
title Clinical and Urodynamic Significance of Morphological Differences in Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion
title_full Clinical and Urodynamic Significance of Morphological Differences in Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion
title_fullStr Clinical and Urodynamic Significance of Morphological Differences in Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and Urodynamic Significance of Morphological Differences in Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion
title_short Clinical and Urodynamic Significance of Morphological Differences in Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion
title_sort clinical and urodynamic significance of morphological differences in intravesical prostatic protrusion
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2963782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21031089
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.10.694
work_keys_str_mv AT leeseungwook clinicalandurodynamicsignificanceofmorphologicaldifferencesinintravesicalprostaticprotrusion
AT chojeongman clinicalandurodynamicsignificanceofmorphologicaldifferencesinintravesicalprostaticprotrusion
AT kangjungyoon clinicalandurodynamicsignificanceofmorphologicaldifferencesinintravesicalprostaticprotrusion
AT yootagkeun clinicalandurodynamicsignificanceofmorphologicaldifferencesinintravesicalprostaticprotrusion