Cargando…
Outreach and screening following the 2005 London bombings: usage and outcomes
BACKGROUND: Little is known about how to remedy the unmet mental health needs associated with major terrorist attacks, or what outcomes are achievable with evidence-based treatment. This article reports the usage, diagnoses and outcomes associated with the 2-year Trauma Response Programme (TRP) for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20178677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291710000206 |
_version_ | 1782189339404402688 |
---|---|
author | Brewin, C. R. Fuchkan, N. Huntley, Z. Robertson, M. Thompson, M. Scragg, P. d'Ardenne, P. Ehlers, A. |
author_facet | Brewin, C. R. Fuchkan, N. Huntley, Z. Robertson, M. Thompson, M. Scragg, P. d'Ardenne, P. Ehlers, A. |
author_sort | Brewin, C. R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Little is known about how to remedy the unmet mental health needs associated with major terrorist attacks, or what outcomes are achievable with evidence-based treatment. This article reports the usage, diagnoses and outcomes associated with the 2-year Trauma Response Programme (TRP) for those affected by the 2005 London bombings. METHOD: Following a systematic and coordinated programme of outreach, the contact details of 910 people were obtained by the TRP. Of these, 596 completed a screening instrument that included the Trauma Screening Questionnaire (TSQ) and items assessing other negative responses. Those scoring ⩾6 on the TSQ, or endorsing other negative responses, received a detailed clinical assessment. Individuals judged to need treatment (n=217) received trauma-focused cognitive-behaviour therapy (TF-CBT) or eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR). Symptom levels were assessed pre- and post-treatment with validated self-report measures of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression, and 66 were followed up at 1 year. RESULTS: Case finding relied primarily on outreach rather than standard referral pathways such as primary care. The effect sizes achieved for treatment of DSM-IV PTSD exceeded those usually found in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and gains were well maintained an average of 1 year later. CONCLUSIONS: Outreach with screening, linked to the provision of evidence-based treatment, seems to be a viable method of identifying and meeting mental health needs following a terrorist attack. Given the failure of normal care pathways, it is a potentially important approach that merits further evaluation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2964043 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29640432010-10-29 Outreach and screening following the 2005 London bombings: usage and outcomes Brewin, C. R. Fuchkan, N. Huntley, Z. Robertson, M. Thompson, M. Scragg, P. d'Ardenne, P. Ehlers, A. Psychol Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Little is known about how to remedy the unmet mental health needs associated with major terrorist attacks, or what outcomes are achievable with evidence-based treatment. This article reports the usage, diagnoses and outcomes associated with the 2-year Trauma Response Programme (TRP) for those affected by the 2005 London bombings. METHOD: Following a systematic and coordinated programme of outreach, the contact details of 910 people were obtained by the TRP. Of these, 596 completed a screening instrument that included the Trauma Screening Questionnaire (TSQ) and items assessing other negative responses. Those scoring ⩾6 on the TSQ, or endorsing other negative responses, received a detailed clinical assessment. Individuals judged to need treatment (n=217) received trauma-focused cognitive-behaviour therapy (TF-CBT) or eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR). Symptom levels were assessed pre- and post-treatment with validated self-report measures of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression, and 66 were followed up at 1 year. RESULTS: Case finding relied primarily on outreach rather than standard referral pathways such as primary care. The effect sizes achieved for treatment of DSM-IV PTSD exceeded those usually found in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and gains were well maintained an average of 1 year later. CONCLUSIONS: Outreach with screening, linked to the provision of evidence-based treatment, seems to be a viable method of identifying and meeting mental health needs following a terrorist attack. Given the failure of normal care pathways, it is a potentially important approach that merits further evaluation. Cambridge University Press 2010-12 2010-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2964043/ /pubmed/20178677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291710000206 Text en Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010. The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/>. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/>. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/>) The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Brewin, C. R. Fuchkan, N. Huntley, Z. Robertson, M. Thompson, M. Scragg, P. d'Ardenne, P. Ehlers, A. Outreach and screening following the 2005 London bombings: usage and outcomes |
title | Outreach and screening following the 2005 London bombings: usage and outcomes |
title_full | Outreach and screening following the 2005 London bombings: usage and outcomes |
title_fullStr | Outreach and screening following the 2005 London bombings: usage and outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Outreach and screening following the 2005 London bombings: usage and outcomes |
title_short | Outreach and screening following the 2005 London bombings: usage and outcomes |
title_sort | outreach and screening following the 2005 london bombings: usage and outcomes |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20178677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291710000206 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brewincr outreachandscreeningfollowingthe2005londonbombingsusageandoutcomes AT fuchkann outreachandscreeningfollowingthe2005londonbombingsusageandoutcomes AT huntleyz outreachandscreeningfollowingthe2005londonbombingsusageandoutcomes AT robertsonm outreachandscreeningfollowingthe2005londonbombingsusageandoutcomes AT thompsonm outreachandscreeningfollowingthe2005londonbombingsusageandoutcomes AT scraggp outreachandscreeningfollowingthe2005londonbombingsusageandoutcomes AT dardennep outreachandscreeningfollowingthe2005londonbombingsusageandoutcomes AT ehlersa outreachandscreeningfollowingthe2005londonbombingsusageandoutcomes |