Cargando…

Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals

About 20%–50% of patients in hospitals are undernourished. The number varies depending on the screening tool amended and clinical setting. A large number of these patients are undernourished when admitted to the hospital, and in most of these patients, undernutrition develops further during hospital...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rasmussen, Henrik H, Holst, Mette, Kondrup, Jens
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21042553
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S11265
_version_ 1782189341706027008
author Rasmussen, Henrik H
Holst, Mette
Kondrup, Jens
author_facet Rasmussen, Henrik H
Holst, Mette
Kondrup, Jens
author_sort Rasmussen, Henrik H
collection PubMed
description About 20%–50% of patients in hospitals are undernourished. The number varies depending on the screening tool amended and clinical setting. A large number of these patients are undernourished when admitted to the hospital, and in most of these patients, undernutrition develops further during hospital stay. The nutrition course of the patient starts by nutritional screening and is linked to the prescription of a nutrition plan and monitoring. The purpose of nutritional screening is to predict the probability of a better or worse outcome due to nutritional factors and whether nutritional treatment is likely to influence this. Most screening tools address four basic questions: recent weight loss, recent food intake, current body mass index, and disease severity. Some screening tools, moreover, include other measurements for predicting the risk of malnutrition. The usefulness of screening methods recommended is based on the aspects of predictive validity, content validity, reliability, and practicability. Various tools are recommended depending on the setting, ie, in the community, in the hospital, and among elderly in institutions. The Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS) 2002 seems to be the best validated screening tool, in terms of predictive validity ie, the clinical outcome improves when patients identified to be at risk are treated. For adult patients in hospital, thus, the NRS 2002 is recommended.
format Text
id pubmed-2964075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-29640752010-11-01 Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals Rasmussen, Henrik H Holst, Mette Kondrup, Jens Clin Epidemiol Review About 20%–50% of patients in hospitals are undernourished. The number varies depending on the screening tool amended and clinical setting. A large number of these patients are undernourished when admitted to the hospital, and in most of these patients, undernutrition develops further during hospital stay. The nutrition course of the patient starts by nutritional screening and is linked to the prescription of a nutrition plan and monitoring. The purpose of nutritional screening is to predict the probability of a better or worse outcome due to nutritional factors and whether nutritional treatment is likely to influence this. Most screening tools address four basic questions: recent weight loss, recent food intake, current body mass index, and disease severity. Some screening tools, moreover, include other measurements for predicting the risk of malnutrition. The usefulness of screening methods recommended is based on the aspects of predictive validity, content validity, reliability, and practicability. Various tools are recommended depending on the setting, ie, in the community, in the hospital, and among elderly in institutions. The Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS) 2002 seems to be the best validated screening tool, in terms of predictive validity ie, the clinical outcome improves when patients identified to be at risk are treated. For adult patients in hospital, thus, the NRS 2002 is recommended. Dove Medical Press 2010-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2964075/ /pubmed/21042553 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S11265 Text en © 2010 Rasmussen et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Rasmussen, Henrik H
Holst, Mette
Kondrup, Jens
Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals
title Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals
title_full Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals
title_fullStr Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals
title_short Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals
title_sort measuring nutritional risk in hospitals
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21042553
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S11265
work_keys_str_mv AT rasmussenhenrikh measuringnutritionalriskinhospitals
AT holstmette measuringnutritionalriskinhospitals
AT kondrupjens measuringnutritionalriskinhospitals