Cargando…
Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals
About 20%–50% of patients in hospitals are undernourished. The number varies depending on the screening tool amended and clinical setting. A large number of these patients are undernourished when admitted to the hospital, and in most of these patients, undernutrition develops further during hospital...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21042553 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S11265 |
_version_ | 1782189341706027008 |
---|---|
author | Rasmussen, Henrik H Holst, Mette Kondrup, Jens |
author_facet | Rasmussen, Henrik H Holst, Mette Kondrup, Jens |
author_sort | Rasmussen, Henrik H |
collection | PubMed |
description | About 20%–50% of patients in hospitals are undernourished. The number varies depending on the screening tool amended and clinical setting. A large number of these patients are undernourished when admitted to the hospital, and in most of these patients, undernutrition develops further during hospital stay. The nutrition course of the patient starts by nutritional screening and is linked to the prescription of a nutrition plan and monitoring. The purpose of nutritional screening is to predict the probability of a better or worse outcome due to nutritional factors and whether nutritional treatment is likely to influence this. Most screening tools address four basic questions: recent weight loss, recent food intake, current body mass index, and disease severity. Some screening tools, moreover, include other measurements for predicting the risk of malnutrition. The usefulness of screening methods recommended is based on the aspects of predictive validity, content validity, reliability, and practicability. Various tools are recommended depending on the setting, ie, in the community, in the hospital, and among elderly in institutions. The Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS) 2002 seems to be the best validated screening tool, in terms of predictive validity ie, the clinical outcome improves when patients identified to be at risk are treated. For adult patients in hospital, thus, the NRS 2002 is recommended. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2964075 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-29640752010-11-01 Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals Rasmussen, Henrik H Holst, Mette Kondrup, Jens Clin Epidemiol Review About 20%–50% of patients in hospitals are undernourished. The number varies depending on the screening tool amended and clinical setting. A large number of these patients are undernourished when admitted to the hospital, and in most of these patients, undernutrition develops further during hospital stay. The nutrition course of the patient starts by nutritional screening and is linked to the prescription of a nutrition plan and monitoring. The purpose of nutritional screening is to predict the probability of a better or worse outcome due to nutritional factors and whether nutritional treatment is likely to influence this. Most screening tools address four basic questions: recent weight loss, recent food intake, current body mass index, and disease severity. Some screening tools, moreover, include other measurements for predicting the risk of malnutrition. The usefulness of screening methods recommended is based on the aspects of predictive validity, content validity, reliability, and practicability. Various tools are recommended depending on the setting, ie, in the community, in the hospital, and among elderly in institutions. The Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS) 2002 seems to be the best validated screening tool, in terms of predictive validity ie, the clinical outcome improves when patients identified to be at risk are treated. For adult patients in hospital, thus, the NRS 2002 is recommended. Dove Medical Press 2010-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC2964075/ /pubmed/21042553 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S11265 Text en © 2010 Rasmussen et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Rasmussen, Henrik H Holst, Mette Kondrup, Jens Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals |
title | Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals |
title_full | Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals |
title_fullStr | Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals |
title_short | Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals |
title_sort | measuring nutritional risk in hospitals |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2964075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21042553 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S11265 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rasmussenhenrikh measuringnutritionalriskinhospitals AT holstmette measuringnutritionalriskinhospitals AT kondrupjens measuringnutritionalriskinhospitals |